1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Smoking cessation intentions and attempts one year after the federally mandated smoke-free housing rule

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The present study examines public housing residents’ smoking cessation intentions, expectancies, and attempts one year after implementation of the Department of Housing and Urban Development’s mandatory smoke-free rule in public housing. The sample includes 233 cigarette smokers, ages 18–80, who reside in the District of Columbia Housing Authority. Data collection occurred between March and August 2019. Descriptive statistics, chi-square, and Wilcoxon two-sample test analyses assessed smoking cessation intentions, expectancies, and attempts across resident demographics and characteristics. Findings showed 17.2% of residents reported not thinking about quitting, 39.1% reported thinking about quitting, and 48.6% reported thinking about quitting specifically because of the rule. Residents ages 60–80 were more likely to consider quitting because of the rule, compared to residents ages 18–59. Of those thinking of quitting, 58.6% were sure they could quit if they tried. Those thinking of quitting due to the rule (62.0%) were more likely to have made at least one quit attempt in the past 3 months than those i not attributinging thinking of quitting to the rule. Res Residents trying to quit reported an average of 2.7 attempts in the last 3 months;; most perceived evidence-based cessation supports as not helpful. A A majority reported thinking about quitting and attempting to quit but continuing to smoke, indicating a significant gap between intent to quit and successfully quitting. Results suggest that the rule positively influenced smoking behaviors. However, additional interventions are needed to assist public housing residents with successfully quitting smoking.

          Related collections

          Most cited references31

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The Fagerstrom Test for Nicotine Dependence: a revision of the Fagerstrom Tolerance Questionnaire

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            The cost of dichotomising continuous variables.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Tobacco Product Use and Cessation Indicators Among Adults — United States, 2018

              Cigarette smoking is the leading cause of preventable disease and death in the United States ( 1 ). The prevalence of adult cigarette smoking has declined in recent years to 14.0% in 2017 ( 2 ). However, an array of new tobacco products, including e-cigarettes, has entered the U.S. market ( 3 ). To assess recent national estimates of tobacco product use among U.S. adults aged ≥18 years, CDC, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and the National Cancer Institute analyzed data from the 2018 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS). In 2018, an estimated 49.1 million U.S. adults (19.7%) reported currently using any tobacco product, including cigarettes (13.7%), cigars (3.9%), e-cigarettes (3.2%), smokeless tobacco (2.4%), and pipes* (1.0%). Most tobacco product users (83.8%) reported using combustible products (cigarettes, cigars, or pipes), and 18.8% reported using two or more tobacco products. The prevalence of any current tobacco product use was higher in males; adults aged ≤65 years; non-Hispanic American Indian/Alaska Natives; those with a General Educational Development certificate (GED); those with an annual household income 30% that are not presented. ††† Hispanic persons could be of any race. All other racial/ethnic groups were non-Hispanic. §§§ Northeast: Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, and Vermont; Midwest: Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, South Dakota, and Wisconsin; South: Alabama, Arkansas, Delaware, District of Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Mississippi, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, and West Virginia; West: Alaska, Arizona, California, Colorado, Hawaii, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, New Mexico, Oregon, Utah, Washington, and Wyoming. ¶¶¶ Based on income variables from the family file (n = 8,310 missing valid income data). Imputed income files were not used in this analysis. **** Private coverage: includes adults who have any comprehensive private insurance plan (including health maintenance organizations and preferred provider organizations). Medicaid: for adults aged 30%; neither daily use nor nondaily use is presented. The figure is a bar chart showing the prevalence of daily and nondaily use of selected tobacco products among adults aged ≥18 years who currently use each tobacco product, in the United States, during 2018. The prevalence of any current tobacco product use was higher among males (25.8%) than among females (14.1%) and among persons aged 25–44 years (23.8%), 45–64 years (21.3%), and 18–24 years (17.1%) than among those aged ≥65 years (11.9%) (Table). Current tobacco product use was also higher among non-Hispanic American Indian/Alaska Native adults (32.3%), non-Hispanic multiracial adults (25.4%), non-Hispanic whites (21.9%), non-Hispanic blacks (19.3%), and Hispanic adults (13.8%) than among non-Hispanic Asian adults (10.0%), as well as among those who lived in the Midwest (23.6%) or the South U.S. Census regions (21.4%) than among those who lived in the West (15.3%) or the Northeast (17.5%). The prevalence of current tobacco product use was also higher among persons who had a GED (41.4%) than among those with other levels of education and among those who were divorced, separated, or widowed (22.6%) or single, never married, or not living with a partner (21.1%) than among those married or living with a partner (18.4%). Current tobacco product use was higher among persons with an annual household income 1 day during the past 12 months because they were trying to quit smoking and former smokers who quit during the past year. † Percentage of former cigarette smokers who quit smoking for ≥6 months during the past year, among current smokers who smoked for ≥2 years and former smokers who quit during the past year. § Percentage of persons who ever smoked (≥100 cigarettes during lifetime) who have quit smoking. The figure is a line chart showing the prevalence of past-year quit attempts and recent cessation and quit ratio among cigarette smokers aged ≥18 years, in the United States, during 2009–2018. Discussion The approximate two thirds decline in adult cigarette smoking prevalence that has occurred since 1965 represents a major public health success ( 1 ). In 2018, 13.7% of U.S. adults aged ≥18 years currently smoked cigarettes, the lowest prevalence recorded since 1965. However, no significant change in cigarette smoking prevalence occurred during 2017–2018. Most cigarette smokers and smokeless tobacco users reported daily use, whereas most e-cigarette and cigar users reported nondaily use. Even nondaily use of cigarettes has been linked to increased mortality risk ( 6 ). Quitting smoking at any age is beneficial for health ( 1 , 4 ). During 2009–2018, significant linear increases occurred in quit attempts, recent successful cessation, and quit ratio. Population-based tobacco control interventions, including high-impact tobacco education campaigns like CDC’s Tips From Former Smokers (https://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/campaign/tips/index.html) campaign and FDA’s Every Try Counts campaign (https://www.fda.gov/tobacco-products/every-try-counts-campaign), combined with barrier-free access to evidence-based cessation treatments, can both motivate persons who use tobacco products to try to quit and help them succeed in quitting. The prevalence of adult e-cigarette use increased from 2.8% in 2017 to 3.2% in 2018 but was much lower than the 20.8% ( 7 ) of U.S. high school students reporting past 30-day e-cigarette use in 2018. The prevalence of e-cigarette use among persons aged 18–24 years is higher than that among other adult age groups, and e-cigarette use in this age group increased from 5.2% in 2017 ( 2 ) to 7.6% in 2018. During 2014–2017 there had been a downward trajectory of adult e-cigarette use ( 2 , 8 ), but during 2017–2018 a significant increase in adult e-cigarette use was detected for the first time. This increase might be related to the emergence of new types of e-cigarettes, especially “pod-mod” devices, which frequently use nicotine salts as opposed to the free-base nicotine used in other e-cigarettes and tobacco products. Sales of JUUL, a pod-mod device, increased by approximately 600% from 2016 to 2017, making it the dominant e-cigarette product in the United States by the end of 2017 ( 9 ). Further research is needed to monitor patterns of e-cigarette use and the relationship between use of e-cigarettes and other tobacco products (e.g., cigarette smoking). The findings in this report are subject to at least three limitations. First, responses were self-reported and were not validated by biochemical testing. However, self-reported smoking status correlates highly with serum cotinine levels ( 10 ). Second, because NHIS is limited to the noninstitutionalized U.S. civilian population, the results are not generalizable to institutionalized populations and persons in the military. Finally, the NHIS Sample Adult response rate of 53.1% might have resulted in nonresponse bias. Coordinated efforts at the local, state, and national levels are needed to continue progress toward reducing tobacco-related disease and death in the United States. Proven strategies include implementation of tobacco price increases, comprehensive smoke-free policies, high-impact antitobacco media campaigns, barrier-free cessation coverage, and comprehensive state tobacco control programs, combined with regulation of the manufacturing, marketing, and distribution of all tobacco products ( 1 , 4 ). Summary What is already known about this topic? Cigarette smoking is the leading cause of preventable disease and death in the United States. Adult cigarette smoking prevalence has declined; however, new tobacco products, including e-cigarettes, have entered the U.S. market. What is added by this report? In 2018, approximately 20% of U.S. adults currently used any tobacco product; cigarette smoking reached an all-time low (13.7%). During 2009–2018, significant increases in three cigarette cessation indicators occurred. During 2017–2018, e-cigarette and smokeless tobacco product use prevalence increased. What are the implications for public health practice? Continued surveillance is critical to informing tobacco control efforts at the national, state, and local levels. Coordinated efforts and regulation of all tobacco products are needed to reduce tobacco-related disease and death in the United States.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Prev Med Rep
                Preventive Medicine Reports
                2211-3355
                11 October 2021
                December 2021
                11 October 2021
                : 24
                : 101600
                Affiliations
                [a ]Virginia Tech-Carilion Fralin Biomedical Research Institute, Blacksburg, VA, USA
                [b ]The George Washington University Milken Institute School of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology, Washington, DC, USA
                [c ]Radford University Carilion, Department of Public Health and Healthcare Leadership, Roanoke, VA, USA
                [d ]Virginia Tech Carilion, Department of Family and Community Medicine, Roanoke, VA, USA
                [e ]Virginia Tech-Center for Biostatistics and Health Data Sciences, Roanoke, VA, USA
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding author at: Virginia Tech-Carilion Fralin Biomedical Research Institute, Department of Population Health Sciences, 2 Riverside Drive, Roanoke, VA 24016, USA. kahorn1@ 123456vt.edu
                Article
                S2211-3355(21)00290-4 101600
                10.1016/j.pmedr.2021.101600
                8683937
                34976657
                6d39b0a3-3a5b-4c25-802a-098a4c7a93c9
                © 2021 The Authors

                This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

                History
                : 3 May 2021
                : 6 October 2021
                : 9 October 2021
                Categories
                Regular Article

                smoking cessation,public housing,policy evaluation,tobacco control,public health

                Comments

                Comment on this article