Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Incidence, Risk Factors, and Outcomes of Patients Who Develop Mucosal Barrier Injury–Laboratory Confirmed Bloodstream Infections in the First 100 Days After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant

      research-article
      , MD, MS 1 , , , PhD 2 , 3 , , MS 2 , , PhD 2 , 3 , , DO, MSCS 4 , , MD, PhD 5 , , MD 2 , 6 , , MD, PhD 7 , , MD 8 , , MD 9 , , MD 10 , , MD 11 , , MD 12 , , MD 13 , 14 , , MD 15 , , MD 16 , , MD 17 , , MD 18 , , MD 19 , 20 , , MD 21 , , MD 22 , , MD 23 , , MD, PhD 24 , 25 , , MD 26 , , MD, MS 27
      JAMA Network Open
      American Medical Association

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Key Points

          Question

          What outcomes are associated with mucosal barrier injury–laboratory confirmed bloodstream infections in patients who undergo allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant?

          Findings

          In a case-cohort study of 16 875 pediatric and adult patients who underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant between 2009 and 2016, the cumulative incidence of mucosal barrier injury–laboratory confirmed bloodstream infections was 13% by day 100, with infection occurring a median of 8 days after stem cell transplant. Overall survival was significantly decreased among patients who developed a mucosal barrier injury–laboratory confirmed bloodstream infection.

          Meaning

          Mucosal barrier injury–laboratory confirmed bloodstream infections are associated with significant morbidity and mortality and, by extension, increased use of health care resources.

          Abstract

          Importance

          Patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) are at risk for bloodstream infection (BSI) secondary to translocation of bacteria through the injured mucosa, termed mucosal barrier injury–laboratory confirmed bloodstream infection (MBI-LCBI), in addition to BSI secondary to indwelling catheters and infection at other sites (BSI-other).

          Objective

          To determine the incidence, timing, risk factors, and outcomes of patients who develop MBI-LCBI in the first 100 days after HSCT.

          Design, Setting, and Participants

          A case-cohort retrospective analysis was performed using data from the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research database on 16 875 consecutive pediatric and adult patients receiving a first allogeneic HSCT from January 1, 2009, to December 31, 2016. Patients were classified into 4 categories: MBI-LCBI (1481 [8.8%]), MBI-LCBI and BSI-other (698 [4.1%]), BSI-other only (2928 [17.4%]), and controls with no BSI (11 768 [69.7%]). Statistical analysis was performed from April 5 to July 17, 2018.

          Main Outcomes and Measures

          Demographic characteristics and outcomes, including overall survival, chronic graft-vs-host disease, and transplant-related mortality (only for patients with malignant disease), were compared among groups.

          Results

          Of the 16 875 patients in the study (9737 [57.7%] male; median [range] age, 47 [0.04-82] years) 13 686 (81.1%) underwent HSCT for a malignant neoplasm, and 3189 (18.9%) underwent HSCT for a nonmalignant condition. The cumulative incidence of MBI-LCBI was 13% (99% CI, 12%-13%) by day 100, and the cumulative incidence of BSI-other was 21% (99% CI, 21%-22%) by day 100. Median (range) time from transplant to first MBI-LCBI was 8 (<1 to 98) days vs 29 (<1 to 100) days for BSI-other. Multivariable analysis revealed an increased risk of MBI-LCBI with poor Karnofsky/Lansky performance status (hazard ratio [HR], 1.21 [99% CI, 1.04-1.41]), cord blood grafts (HR, 2.89 [99% CI, 1.97-4.24]), myeloablative conditioning (HR, 1.46 [99% CI, 1.19-1.78]), and posttransplant cyclophosphamide graft-vs-host disease prophylaxis (HR, 1.85 [99% CI, 1.38-2.48]). One-year mortality was significantly higher for patients with MBI-LCBI (HR, 1.81 [99% CI, 1.56-2.12]), BSI-other (HR, 1.81 [99% CI, 1.60-2.06]), and MBI-LCBI plus BSI-other (HR, 2.65 [99% CI, 2.17-3.24]) compared with controls. Infection was more commonly reported as a cause of death for patients with MBI-LCBI (139 of 740 [18.8%]), BSI (251 of 1537 [16.3%]), and MBI-LCBI plus BSI (94 of 435 [21.6%]) than for controls (566 of 4740 [11.9%]).

          Conclusions and Relevance

          In this cohort study, MBI-LCBI, in addition to any BSIs, were associated with significant morbidity and mortality after HSCT. Further investigation into risk reduction should be a clinical and scientific priority in this patient population.

          Abstract

          This cohort study examines the incidence, timing, risk factors, and outcomes of patients who develop mucosal barrier injury–laboratory confirmed bloodstream infection (MBI-LCBI) in the first 100 days after hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT).

          Related collections

          Most cited references28

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Precision Identification of Diverse Bloodstream Pathogens in the Gut Microbiome

          A comprehensive evaluation of every patient with a bloodstream infection includes an attempt to identify the infectious source. Pathogens can originate from various places, such as the gut microbiome, skin, and external environment. Identifying the definitive origin of an infection would enable precise interventions focused on management of the source 1,2 . Unfortunately, hospital infection control practices are often informed by assumptions about the source of various specific pathogens; if these assumptions are incorrect they lead to interventions that do not decrease pathogen exposure 3 . Here, we develop and apply a streamlined bioinformatic tool, named StrainSifter, to match bloodstream pathogens precisely to a candidate source. We then leverage this approach to interrogate the gut microbiome as a potential reservoir of bloodstream pathogens in a cohort of hematopoietic cell transplantation recipients. We find that patients with Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae bloodstream infections have concomitant gut colonization with these organisms, suggesting that the gut may be a source of these infections. We also find cases where classically non-enteric pathogens, such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus epidermidis, are found in the gut microbiome, thereby challenging existing informal dogma of these infections originating from environmental or skin sources. Thus, we present an approach to distinguish the source of various bloodstream infections, which may facilitate more accurate tracking and prevention of hospital-acquired infections.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Small vessels, big trouble in the kidneys and beyond: hematopoietic stem cell transplantation-associated thrombotic microangiopathy.

            Transplantation-associated thrombotic microangiopathy (TA-TMA) is a challenging diagnosis after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Although endothelial injury represents the final common pathway of disease, the exact pathophysiology of TA-TMA remains unclear. Potential causes include infections, chemotherapy, radiation, and calcineurin inhibitors. Recent literature addresses the roles of cytokines, graft-versus-host disease, the coagulation cascade, and complement in the pathogenesis of TA-TMA. Current diagnostic criteria are unsatisfactory, because patients who have received a transplant can have multiple other reasons for the laboratory abnormalities currently used to diagnose TA-TMA. Moreover, our lack of understanding of the exact mechanism of disease limits the development and evaluation of potential treatments. Short- and long-term renal complications contribute to TA-TMA's overall poor prognosis. In light of these challenges, future research must validate novel markers of disease to aid in early diagnosis, guide current and future treatments, prevent long-term morbidity, and improve outcomes. We focus on TA-TMA as a distinct complication of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, emphasizing the central role of the kidney in this disease.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The genetic fingerprint of susceptibility for transplant-associated thrombotic microangiopathy.

              Transplant-associated thrombotic microangiopathy (TA-TMA) occurs frequently after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) and can lead to significant morbidity and mortality. There are no data addressing individual susceptibility to TA-TMA. We performed a hypothesis-driven analysis of 17 candidate genes known to play a role in complement activation as part of a prospective study of TMA in HSCT recipients. We examined the functional significance of gene variants by using gene expression profiling. Among 77 patients undergoing genetic testing, 34 had TMA. Sixty-five percent of patients with TMA had genetic variants in at least one gene compared with 9% of patients without TMA (P < .0001). Gene variants were increased in patients of all races with TMA, but nonwhites had more variants than whites (2.5 [range, 0-7] vs 0 [range, 0-2]; P < .0001). Variants in ≥3 genes were identified only in nonwhites with TMA and were associated with high mortality (71%). RNA sequencing analysis of pretransplantation samples showed upregulation of multiple complement pathways in patients with TMA who had gene variants, including variants predicted as possibly benign by computer algorithm, compared with those without TMA and without gene variants. Our data reveal important differences in genetic susceptibility to HSCT-associated TMA based on recipient genotype. These data will allow prospective risk assessment and intervention to prevent TMA in highly susceptible transplant recipients. Our findings may explain, at least in part, racial disparities previously reported in transplant recipients and may guide treatment strategies to improve outcomes.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                JAMA Netw Open
                JAMA Netw Open
                JAMA Netw Open
                JAMA Network Open
                American Medical Association
                2574-3805
                8 January 2020
                January 2020
                8 January 2020
                : 3
                : 1
                : e1918668
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Division of Bone Marrow Transplantation and Immune Deficiency, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio
                [2 ]Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research, Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee
                [3 ]Division of Biostatistics, Institute for Health and Equity, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee
                [4 ]Division of Infectious Disease, Department of Pediatrics, Nationwide Children’s Hospital, Columbus, Ohio
                [5 ]Division of Pediatric Oncology/Hematology, Department of Pediatrics, Penn State Hershey Children’s Hospital and College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania
                [6 ]Divsion of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee
                [7 ]Department of Hematology/Oncology, Hospital Infantil Universitario Nino Jesus, Madrid, Spain
                [8 ]Divsion of Pediatric Allergy, Immunology & Bone Marrow Transplantation, Benioff Children’s Hospital, University of California, San Francisco
                [9 ]Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville
                [10 ]Division of Pediatric Hematology-Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, Yale New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut
                [11 ]Division of Hematological Malignancy and Cellular Therapeutics, University of Kansas Health System, Kansas City
                [12 ]Department of Hematology/Oncology, Johns Hopkins All Children’s Hospital, St Petersburg, Florida
                [13 ]Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
                [14 ]Oncology Center, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
                [15 ]Division of Hematology/Oncology/Bone Marrow Transplantation, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison
                [16 ]Division of Clinical Hematology, Hospital de la Santa Creu I Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
                [17 ]Department of Blood and Marrow Transplantation, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
                [18 ]Department of Medicine, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey
                [19 ]Department of Laboratory Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
                [20 ]Centre for Clinical Research Sormland, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
                [21 ]Department of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Blood and Marrow Transplantation, Cleveland Clinic Children’s Hospital, Cleveland, Ohio
                [22 ]Division of Hematologic Malignancies and Cellular Therapy, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
                [23 ]Adult Bone Marrow Transplant Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
                [24 ]Pediatric Blood and Marrow Transplantation Program, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Netherlands
                [25 ]Division of Pediatric Stem Cell Transplantation, Department of Pediatrics, Princess Maxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands
                [26 ]Department of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, Florida
                [27 ]Division of Hematology/Oncology, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
                Author notes
                Article Information
                Accepted for Publication: November 10, 2019.
                Published: January 8, 2020. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.18668
                Open Access: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License. © 2020 Dandoy CE et al. JAMA Network Open.
                Corresponding Author: Christopher E. Dandoy, MD, MS, Division of Bone Marrow Transplantation and Immune Deficiency, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, 3333 Burnet Ave, MLC 11027, Cincinnati, OH 45229 ( christopher.dandoy@ 123456cchmc.org ).
                Author Contributions: Dr Dandoy had full access to all the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
                Concept and design: Dandoy, Kim, Diaz, Dvorak, Ganguly, Hashmi, Hematti, Olsson, Rotz, Lindemans, Komanduri, Riches.
                Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: Dandoy, Kim, Chen, Ahn, Ardura, Brown, Chhabra, Diaz, Dvorak, Farhadfar, Flagg, Ganguly, Hale, Hematti, Martino, Nishihori, Nusrat, Olsson, Sung, Perales, Lindemans, Komanduri, Riches.
                Drafting of the manuscript: Dandoy, Kim, Chen, Ahn, Hale, Riches.
                Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Dandoy, Chen, Ardura, Brown, Chhabra, Diaz, Dvorak, Farhadfar, Flagg, Ganguly, Hale, Hashmi, Hematti, Martino, Nishihori, Nusrat, Olsson, Rotz, Sung, Perales, Lindemans, Komanduri, Riches.
                Statistical analysis: Dandoy, Kim, Chen, Ahn, Diaz, Ganguly, Rotz, Riches.
                Administrative, technical, or material support: Dandoy, Kim, Brown, Hale.
                Supervision: Dandoy, Kim, Diaz, Ganguly, Hale, Perales, Komanduri, Riches.
                Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Ardura reported receiving grants from the National Institutes of Health National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, the National Institutes of Health Division of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, and Shire; and personal fees from Imedex outside the submitted work. Dr Dvorak reported receiving personal fees from Alexion Inc, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, and Jasper Pharmaceuticals outside the submitted work. Dr Ganguly reported receiving personal fees from Seattle Genetics outside the submitted work. Dr Olsson reported receiving personal fees from AstraZeneca outside the submitted work. Dr Sung reported receiving grants from Merck and Novartis and was a consultant for Celltrion outside the submitted work. Dr Perales reported receiving personal fees from AbbVie, Bellicum, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Nektar Therapeutics, Novartis, Omeros, Takeda, Molmed, Servier, Medigene, and Merck; and personal fees and other from Incyte outside the submitted work. Dr Lindemans reported being a medical consultant for Chimerix outside the submitted work. Dr Riches reported being on the review board of Gamida Cell outside the submitted work. No other disclosures were reported.
                Article
                zoi190705
                10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.18668
                6991246
                31913492
                6d642f1b-2ba7-4670-b390-f59cecc0f04d
                Copyright 2020 Dandoy CE et al. JAMA Network Open.

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License.

                History
                : 23 July 2019
                : 10 November 2019
                Categories
                Research
                Original Investigation
                Online Only
                Oncology

                Comments

                Comment on this article