100
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      International subarachnoid aneurysm trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised comparison of effects on survival, dependency, seizures, rebleeding, subgroups, and aneurysm occlusion.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Two types of treatment are being used for patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: endovascular detachable-coil treatment or craniotomy and clipping. We undertook a randomised, multicentre trial to compare these treatments in patients who were suitable for either treatment because the relative safety and efficacy of these approaches had not been established. Here we present clinical outcomes 1 year after treatment.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Lancet
          Lancet (London, England)
          Elsevier BV
          1474-547X
          0140-6736
          September 6 2005
          : 366
          : 9488
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Neurovascular Research Unit, Nuffield Department of Surgery, University of Oxford and Oxford Radcliffe Hospitals NHS Trust, Radcliffe Infirmary, Oxford, UK. nvru@nds.ox.ac.uk
          Article
          S0140-6736(05)67214-5
          10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67214-5
          16139655
          6def0b47-9707-4e28-999d-1e68bcb99f4b
          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article