Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
11
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Effect of high-carbohydrate or high‐monounsaturated fatty acid diets on blood pressure: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Context

          Current dietary guidelines for cardiovascular disease risk management recommend restricting intake of saturated fatty acids (SFAs). However, the optimal macronutrient profile, in the context of a low‐SFA diet, remains controversial. The blood-pressure effect of replacing SFAs in diets with monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFAs) compared with carbohydrate has not been quantified to date.

          Objective

          To synthesize the evidence for the effect of substituting a high-carbohydrate (high-CHO) diet for a high-monounsaturated fatty acid (high-MUFA) diet on blood pressure, a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials in a population without health restrictions was conducted.

          Data Sources

          MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Clinical Trials were searched through June 7, 2017. Randomized controlled trials of > 3 weeks duration that assessed the effect of high-MUFA diets in isocaloric substitution for high-CHO diets on systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) were included.

          Data Extraction

          Data were pooled using the generic-inverse variance method with random effects models and expressed as mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Heterogeneity was assessed by Cochran Q statistic and quantified by the I 2 statistic. The quality of the evidence was assessed with the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system.

          Results

          Fourteen trials (n = 980 participants) were included in the analysis. Comparatively, the high-MUFA diets in isocaloric substitution for high-CHO diets did not demonstrate a greater reduction in blood pressure (SBP: MD, −0.08 mmHg [95%CI, −1.01 to 0.84], P = 0.86; DBP: MD = 0.01 mmHg [95%CI, −0.73 to 0.75], P = 0.98). The overall quality of the evidence was assessed as moderate.

          Conclusions

          In the context of low SFAs, high-MUFA diets in isocaloric substitution for high-CHO diets did not affect blood pressure in individuals with and without hypertension. Large-scale trials achieving higher MUFA targets are required to support these findings.

          ClinicalTrials.gov ID

          NCT02626325.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Nutr Rev
          Nutr. Rev
          nutritionreviews
          Nutrition Reviews
          Oxford University Press
          0029-6643
          1753-4887
          January 2019
          24 August 2018
          01 January 2020
          : 77
          : 1
          : 19-31
          Affiliations
          [1 ]St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, Canada
          [2 ]University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
          [3 ]Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, State University of Maringa, Maringa, Brazil
          [4 ]Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, Canada
          [5 ]Division of Endocrinology & Metabolism, St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, Canada
          [6 ]Toronto 3D Knowledge Synthesis and Clinical Trials Unit, St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, Canada
          [7 ]University Hospital Merkur, University of Zagreb, School of Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia
          Author notes

          These authors contributed equally to this review. See Acknowledgments for full details of all author contributions.

          Clinical Nutrition and Risk Factor Modification Centre, St. Michael’s Hospital, 30 Bond St, Toronto, Ontario, M5B 1M8, Canada. E-mail: v.vuksan@ 123456utoronto.ca .
          Article
          PMC6277205 PMC6277205 6277205 nuy040
          10.1093/nutrit/nuy040
          6277205
          30165599
          6e35fc46-b6b7-4aa3-bb28-6f610653948d
          © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Life Sciences Institute. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

          This article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model ( https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model)

          History
          Page count
          Pages: 13
          Funding
          Funded by: PSI Graham Farquharson Knowledge Translation Fellowship
          Funded by: Diabetes Canada Clinician Scientist award
          Funded by: Canadian Institutes of Health Research 10.13039/501100000024
          Funded by: Institute of Nutrition, Metabolism and Diabetes 10.13039/501100000035
          Funded by: Canadian Nutrition Society
          Categories
          Special Articles

          systolic blood pressure,systematic review,randomized controlled trial,monounsaturated fatty acid,meta-analysis,macronutrient,isocaloric diet,diastolic blood pressure,carbohydrate

          Comments

          Comment on this article