17
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Fractionation and evaluation of radical scavenging peptides from in vitro digests of buckwheat protein

      , , , ,
      Food Chemistry
      Elsevier BV

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Buckwheat protein (BWP) isolate was subjected to a two-stage in vitro digestion (1 h pepsin followed by 2 h pancreatin at 37 °C). The antioxidant potential of the BWP digests was compared by assessing their capacity to scavenge 2,2'-azinobis (3-ethylbenzothiszoline-6-sulphonic acid) (ABTS(+•)) and hydroxyl ((•)OH) radicals. The 2-h pancreatin digest, which demonstrated the strongest activity against both radicals, was subjected to Sephadex G-25 gel filtration. Of the six fractions collected, fractions IV (456 Da) and VI (362 Da) showed the highest ABTS(+•) scavenging activity and were 23-27% superior to mixed BWP digest (P < 0.05). Fraction VI was most effective in neutralizing (•)OH and was 86 and 24% more efficient (P < 0.05) than mixed BWP digest and fraction IV, respectively. LC-MS/MS identified Trp-Pro-Leu, Val-Pro-Trp, and Val-Phe-Pro-Trp (IV), Pro-Trp (V) and tryptophan (VI) to be the prominant peptides/amino acid in these fractions.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Food Chemistry
          Food Chemistry
          Elsevier BV
          03088146
          February 2010
          February 2010
          : 118
          : 3
          : 582-588
          Article
          10.1016/j.foodchem.2009.05.024
          2844091
          20352082
          6e52fd3d-0319-43c9-9b77-995cb4d5b93f
          © 2010

          https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/

          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article