1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Genomic analysis of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D 3 action in mouse intestine reveals compartment and segment-specific gene regulatory effects

      research-article
      1 , , 1 , , 1 , , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 2 , 3 , , 1 , , 4 ,
      The Journal of Biological Chemistry
      American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
      vitamin D, vitamin D receptor, steroid hormone receptor, transcription, transcription factor, transcription enhancer, intestinal epithelium, colon, small intestine, genomics, 1,25(OH)2D3, 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3, CAR, constitutive androstane receptor, DEG, differentially expressed gene, FDR, false detection rate, PGE2, prostaglandin E2, PXR, pregnane X receptor, SI, small intestine, VD, 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D, VDR, vitamin D receptor

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D (VD) regulates intestinal calcium absorption in the small intestine (SI) and also reduces risk of colonic inflammation and cancer. However, the intestine compartment-specific target genes of VD signaling are unknown. Here, we examined VD action across three functional compartments of the intestine using RNA-seq to measure VD-induced changes in gene expression and Chromatin Immunoprecipitation with next generation sequencing to measure vitamin D receptor (VDR) genomic binding. We found that VD regulated the expression of 55 shared transcripts in the SI crypt, SI villi, and in the colon, including Cyp24a1, S100g, Trpv6, and Slc30a10. Other VD-regulated transcripts were unique to the SI crypt (162 up, 210 down), villi (199 up, 63 down), or colon (102 up, 28 down), but this did not correlate with mRNA levels of the VDR. Furthermore, bioinformatic analysis identified unique VD-regulated biological functions in each compartment. VDR-binding sites were found in 70% of upregulated genes from the colon and SI villi but were less common in upregulated genes from the SI crypt and among downregulated genes, suggesting some transcript-level VD effects are likely indirect. Consistent with this, we show that VD regulated the expression of other transcription factors and their downstream targets. Finally, we demonstrate that compartment-specific VD-mediated gene expression was associated with compartment-specific VDR-binding sites (<30% of targets) and enrichment of intestinal transcription factor–binding motifs within VDR-binding peaks. Taken together, our data reveal unique spatial patterns of VD action in the intestine and suggest novel mechanisms that could account for compartment-specific functions of this hormone.

          Related collections

          Most cited references66

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          HIF1α and metabolic reprogramming in inflammation.

          HIF1α is a common component of pathways involved in the control of cellular metabolism and has a role in regulating immune cell effector functions. Additionally, HIF1α is critical for the maturation of dendritic cells and for the activation of T cells. HIF1α is induced in LPS-activated macrophages, where it is critically involved in glycolysis and the induction of proinflammatory genes, notably Il1b. The mechanism of LPS-stimulated HIF1α induction involves succinate, which inhibits prolyl hydroxylases (PHDs). Pyruvate kinase M2 (PKM2) is also induced and interacts with and promotes the function of HIF1α. In another critical inflammatory cell type, Th17 cells, HIF1α acts via the retinoic acid-related orphan receptor-γt (RORγt) to drive Th17 differentiation. HIF1α is therefore a key reprogrammer of metabolism in inflammatory cells that promotes inflammatory gene expression.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Regulation of immune responses by prostaglandin E2.

            PGE(2), an essential homeostatic factor, is also a key mediator of immunopathology in chronic infections and cancer. The impact of PGE(2) reflects the balance between its cyclooxygenase 2-regulated synthesis and 15-hydroxyprostaglandin dehydrogenase-driven degradation and the pattern of expression of PGE(2) receptors. PGE(2) enhances its own production but suppresses acute inflammatory mediators, resulting in its predominance at late/chronic stages of immunity. PGE(2) supports activation of dendritic cells but suppresses their ability to attract naive, memory, and effector T cells. PGE(2) selectively suppresses effector functions of macrophages and neutrophils and the Th1-, CTL-, and NK cell-mediated type 1 immunity, but it promotes Th2, Th17, and regulatory T cell responses. PGE(2) modulates chemokine production, inhibiting the attraction of proinflammatory cells while enhancing local accumulation of regulatory T cells cells and myeloid-derived suppressor cells. Targeting the production, degradation, and responsiveness to PGE(2) provides tools to modulate the patterns of immunity in a wide range of diseases, from autoimmunity to cancer.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Novel role of the vitamin D receptor in maintaining the integrity of the intestinal mucosal barrier.

              Emerging evidence supports a pathological link between vitamin D deficiency and the risk of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). To explore the mechanism we used the dextran sulfate sodium (DSS)-induced colitis model to investigate the role of the vitamin D receptor (VDR) in mucosal barrier homeostasis. While VDR(+/+) mice were mostly resistant to 2.5% DSS, VDR(-/-) mice developed severe diarrhea, rectal bleeding, and marked body weight loss, leading to death in 2 wk. Histological examination revealed extensive ulceration and impaired wound healing in the colonic epithelium of DSS-treated VDR(-/-) mice. Severe ulceration in VDR(-/-) mice was preceded by a greater loss of intestinal transepithelial electric resistance (TER) compared with VDR(+/+) mice. Confocal and electron microscopy (EM) revealed severe disruption in epithelial junctions in VDR(-/-) mice after 3-day DSS treatment. Therefore, VDR(-/-) mice were much more susceptible to DSS-induced mucosal injury than VDR(+/+) mice. In cell cultures, 1,25-dihydroxy-vitamin D(3) [1,25(OH)(2)D(3)] markedly enhanced tight junctions formed by Caco-2 monolayers by increasing junction protein expression and TER and preserved the structural integrity of tight junctions in the presence of DSS. VDR knockdown with small interfering (si)RNA reduced the junction proteins and TER in Caco-2 monolayers. 1,25(OH)(2)D(3) can also stimulate epithelial cell migration in vitro. These observations suggest that VDR plays a critical role in mucosal barrier homeostasis by preserving the integrity of junction complexes and the healing capacity of the colonic epithelium. Therefore, vitamin D deficiency may compromise the mucosal barrier, leading to increased susceptibility to mucosal damage and increased risk of IBD.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                J Biol Chem
                J Biol Chem
                The Journal of Biological Chemistry
                American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
                0021-9258
                1083-351X
                30 June 2022
                August 2022
                30 June 2022
                : 298
                : 8
                : 102213
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Genetics, Human Genetics Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Institute of Food, Nutrition, and Health, EOHSI, Rutgers University, New Jersey, USA
                [2 ]Department of Medicine, Section of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
                [3 ]Department of Microbiology, Biochemistry, and Molecular Genetics, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey, USA
                [4 ]Department of Nutritional Science, University of Texas, Austin, Texas, USA
                Author notes
                []For correspondence: James C. Fleet; Michael P. Verzi; Sylvia Christakos christak@ 123456njms.rutgers.edu Verzi@ 123456biology.rutgers.edu james.fleet@ 123456austin.utexas.edu
                [‡]

                These authors contributed equally to this work.

                Article
                S0021-9258(22)00655-X 102213
                10.1016/j.jbc.2022.102213
                9358460
                35779631
                6e5e3471-4c2f-4856-8d9a-5008c6f7d15c
                © 2022 The Authors

                This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 9 March 2022
                : 24 June 2022
                Categories
                Research Article

                Biochemistry
                vitamin d,vitamin d receptor,steroid hormone receptor,transcription,transcription factor,transcription enhancer,intestinal epithelium,colon,small intestine,genomics,1,25(oh)2d3, 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin d3,car, constitutive androstane receptor,deg, differentially expressed gene,fdr, false detection rate,pge2, prostaglandin e2,pxr, pregnane x receptor,si, small intestine,vd, 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin d,vdr, vitamin d receptor

                Comments

                Comment on this article