7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Conversational cohesion patterns in men and women with Alzheimer's disease: a longitudinal study.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The use of cohesion devices in conversations was examined in 60 individuals (31 women, 29 men) with early to midstage Alzheimer's disease (AD) and 47 non-demented elderly (NE) (27 women, 20 men). AD individuals produced more referent errors than NE, although AD and NE subjects otherwise demonstrated similar use of cohesion devices. AD women showed more frequent use of two elliptical devices (clause omission and word omission) compared with AD men and NE men and women. A subset of 23 AD subjects (13 women, 10 men) who completed four data collections (entry, 6, 12 and 18 months) was followed longitudinally. They demonstrated a significant decline in the number of ellipses and conjunctions at 18 months post-entry. As AD subjects produced fewer and shorter utterances across time, their use of all cohesive devices declined. No gender differences were found over time. Although referencing errors differentiated early to midstage AD from NE, conversational discourse tasks alone may have limited clinical value to assess and monitor communication competence.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Int J Lang Commun Disord
          International journal of language & communication disorders
          1368-2822
          1368-2822
          May 29 2000
          : 35
          : 1
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Case Western Reserve University, USA.
          Article
          10.1080/136828200247241
          10824224
          6e7cf8db-5fea-469f-b3ad-6f9d022d1d28
          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article