3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Marine and marginal marine Ostracoda as proxies in geoarchaeology

      , , ,
      Marine Micropaleontology
      Elsevier BV

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references102

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          A review of the history of the Baltic Sea, 13.0-8.0 ka BP

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Sea-level change in the Mediterranean Sea since the LGM: model predictions for tectonically stable areas

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              How Close Do We Live to Water? A Global Analysis of Population Distance to Freshwater Bodies

              Traditionally, people have inhabited places with ready access to fresh water. Today, over 50% of the global population lives in urban areas, and water can be directed via tens of kilometres of pipelines. Still, however, a large part of the world's population is directly dependent on access to natural freshwater sources. So how are inhabited places related to the location of freshwater bodies today? We present a high-resolution global analysis of how close present-day populations live to surface freshwater. We aim to increase the understanding of the relationship between inhabited places, distance to surface freshwater bodies, and climatic characteristics in different climate zones and administrative regions. Our results show that over 50% of the world's population lives closer than 3 km to a surface freshwater body, and only 10% of the population lives further than 10 km away. There are, however, remarkable differences between administrative regions and climatic zones. Populations in Australia, Asia, and Europe live closest to water. Although populations in arid zones live furthest away from freshwater bodies in absolute terms, relatively speaking they live closest to water considering the limited number of freshwater bodies in those areas. Population distributions in arid zones show statistically significant relationships with a combination of climatic factors and distance to water, whilst in other zones there is no statistically significant relationship with distance to water. Global studies on development and climate adaptation can benefit from an improved understanding of these relationships between human populations and the distance to fresh water.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Marine Micropaleontology
                Marine Micropaleontology
                Elsevier BV
                03778398
                June 2022
                June 2022
                : 174
                : 102054
                Article
                10.1016/j.marmicro.2021.102054
                6f3e3c34-bb66-43cc-b7ea-0b024cc28d33
                © 2022

                https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/

                https://doi.org/10.15223/policy-017

                https://doi.org/10.15223/policy-037

                https://doi.org/10.15223/policy-012

                https://doi.org/10.15223/policy-029

                https://doi.org/10.15223/policy-004

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article