4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Assessment of a High Sensitivity Method for Identification of IDH1 R132x Mutations in Tumors and Plasma of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma Patients

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Hotspot codon 132 mutations (R132x IDH1m) are frequent in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC), are druggable by anti- IDH1m agents, and could represent a marker of disease progression. Developing an assay to identify R132x IDH1m would provide a useful tool to select patients benefitting from targeted treatments. We tested a quantitative real-time allele-specific polymerase chain reaction (qPCR)-based method to detect the main R132x IDH1m in an Italian ICC series ( n = 61) of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples, and on circulating-free DNA samples. The outcomes were compared with nested PCR/Sanger sequencing. Reconstitution experiments of plasmids harboring the different R132x IDH1m mixed with wild-type (WT) DNA demonstrated that qPCR is able to detect at least 2% of all mutated allele. High efficiency was also observed on patient-derived mutated DNA mixed with WT DNA (up to 10% and 0.3 ng of mutated template); qPCR detected 16.4% of mutated samples (one R132G, three R132C and six R132L) while nested PCR/Sanger sequencing only 8.2% (four R132L and one R132G). In a single patient with an R132C-mutated tumor, qPCR was also performed on plasma samples collected at four time-points, observing an increase correlating with disease progression. In conclusion, we developed a qPCR assay which could represent a fast, inexpensive and sensitive tool both for detection of R132x IDH1m in ICC samples and monitoring disease progression from liquid biopsy.

          Related collections

          Most cited references21

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Exome sequencing identifies frequent inactivating mutations in BAP1, ARID1A and PBRM1 in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas.

          Through exomic sequencing of 32 intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas, we discovered frequent inactivating mutations in multiple chromatin-remodeling genes (including BAP1, ARID1A and PBRM1), and mutation in one of these genes occurred in almost half of the carcinomas sequenced. We also identified frequent mutations at previously reported hotspots in the IDH1 and IDH2 genes encoding metabolic enzymes in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas. In contrast, TP53 was the most frequently altered gene in a series of nine gallbladder carcinomas. These discoveries highlight the key role of dysregulated chromatin remodeling in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Comprehensive Molecular Profiling of Intrahepatic and Extrahepatic Cholangiocarcinomas: Potential Targets for Intervention

            Purpose: Various genetic driver aberrations have been identified among distinct anatomic and clinical subtypes of intrahepatic and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, and these molecular alterations may be prognostic biomarkers and/or predictive of drug response. Experimental Design: Tumor samples from patients with cholangiocarcinoma who consented prospectively were analyzed using the MSK-IMPACT platform, a targeted next generation sequencing assay that analyzes all exons and selected introns of 410 cancer-associated genes. Fisher’s exact tests were performed to identify associations between clinical characteristics and genetic alterations. Results: 195 patients were studied: 78% intrahepatic and 22% extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. The most commonly altered genes in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (IHC) were IDH1 (30%), ARID1A (23%) BAP1 (20%), TP53 (20%) and FGFR2 gene fusions (14%). A tendency towards mutual exclusivity was seen between multiple genes in IHC including TP53:IDH1 , IDH1:KRAS , TP53:BAP1 , IDH1:FGFR2 . Alterations in CDKN2A/B and ERBB2 were associated with reduced survival and time to progression on chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced or metastatic disease. Genetic alterations with potential therapeutic implications were identified in 47% of patients, leading to biomarker directed therapy or clinical trial enrollment in 16% of patients. Conclusions: Cholangiocarcinoma is a genetically diverse cancer. Alterations in CDKN2A/B and ERBB2 are associated with negative prognostic implications in patients with advanced disease. Somatic alterations with therapeutic implications were identified in almost half of patients. These prospective data provide a contemporary benchmark for guiding the development of targeted therapies in molecularly profiled cholangiocarcinoma, and support to the use of molecular profiling to guide therapy selection in patients with advanced biliary cancers. This report evaluates the prognostic and therapeutic implications of comprehensive genetic analysis of patients with advanced cholangiocarcinoma. Through targeted deep sequencing of all exons and selected introns of 410 key cancer-associated genes, we identified genetic alterations with potential therapeutic implications in 47% of patients, leading to biomarker directed therapy or clinical trial enrolment in 16% of patients. Correlation of genetic alterations with clinical outcomes demonstrated that alterations in CDKN2A/B and ERBB2 were associated with reduced overall survival and shorter time to progression on first line chemotherapy. These findings indicate that molecular profiling can facilitate enrollment of patients with cholangiocarcinoma to biomarker selected clinical trials, and that specific genotypes may have prognostic implications in terms of clinical outcomes.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Mutations in Isocitrate Dehydrogenase 1 and 2 Occur Frequently in Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinomas and Share Hypermethylation Targets with Glioblastomas

              Mutations in the genes encoding isocitrate dehydrogenase, IDH1 and IDH2, have been reported in gliomas, myeloid leukemias, chondrosarcomas, and thyroid cancer. We discovered IDH1 and IDH2 mutations in 34 of 326 (10%) intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas. Tumor with mutations in IDH1 or IDH2 had lower 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5hmC) and higher 5-methylcytosine (5mC) levels, as well as increased dimethylation of histone H3K79. Mutations in IDH1 or IDH2 were associated with longer overall survival (p = 0.028) and were independently associated with a longer time to tumor recurrence after intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma resection in multivariate analysis (p = 0.021). IDH1 and IDH2 mutations are significantly associated with increased levels of p53 in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas, but no mutations in the p53 gene were found, suggesting that mutations in IDH1 and IDH2 may cause a stress that leads to p53 activation. We identified 2,309 genes that were significantly hypermethylated in 19 cholangiocarcinomas with mutations in IDH1 or IDH2, compared with cholangiocarcinomas without these mutations. Hypermethylated CpG sites were significantly enriched in CpG shores and upstream of transcription start sites, suggesting a global regulation of transcriptional potential. Half of the hypermethylated genes overlapped with DNA hypermethylation in IDH1-mutant gliobastomas, suggesting the existence of a common set of genes whose expression may be affected by mutations in IDH1 or IDH2 in different types of tumors.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Cancers (Basel)
                Cancers (Basel)
                cancers
                Cancers
                MDPI
                2072-6694
                30 March 2019
                April 2019
                : 11
                : 4
                : 454
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Cancer Genomics Laboratory, Fondazione Edo ed Elvo Tempia, Via Malta 3, 13900 Biella, Italy
                [2 ]Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Fondazione Edo ed Elvo Tempia, Via dei Ponderanesi 2, 13875 Ponderano, Biella, Italy; maria.scatolini@ 123456fondazionetempia.org (M.S.); enrico.grosso@ 123456fondazionetempia.org (E.G.)
                [3 ]Department of Oncology, University of Turin, 10100 Torino, Italy; pasquale.lombardi@ 123456unito.it (P.L.); roberto.filippi@ 123456unito.it (R.F.); massimo.aglietta@ 123456ircc.it (M.A.); francesco.leone@ 123456unito.it (F.L.)
                [4 ]Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Firenze, 50100 Firenze, Italy; chiara.raggi@ 123456unifi.it
                [5 ]Center for Autoimmune Liver Diseases, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, 20089 Rozzano, Italy
                [6 ]Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, 10100 Torino, Italy; caterina.marchio@ 123456ircc.it
                [7 ]Pathology Unit, Candiolo Cancer Institute-FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, 10060 Torino, Italy
                [8 ]Division of Medical Oncology, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, 10060 Torino, Italy; giuliana.cavalloni@ 123456ircc.it
                Author notes
                [* ]Correspondence: caterina.peraldoneia@ 123456fondazionetempia.org ; Tel.: +39-015-351-830; Fax: +39-01-521-116
                [†]

                These authors contribute equally to this work.

                Article
                cancers-11-00454
                10.3390/cancers11040454
                6521091
                30935002
                7052175e-2f9c-49c0-ad14-c8ff1d41450f
                © 2019 by the authors.

                Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 11 March 2019
                : 28 March 2019
                Categories
                Article

                idh1 mutation,intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma,qpcr,liquid biopsy,biomarker

                Comments

                Comment on this article