1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Real-world efficacy of belimumab in systemic lupus erythematosus: a prospective cohort from a single centre in China

      , , , , , , ,
      Rheumatology
      Oxford University Press (OUP)

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          The objective of this study was to explore the efficacy and safety of belimumab among Chinese patients with SLE in a real-world setting.

          Methods

          A prospective cohort study was performed, and SLE patients taking belimumab on a background of standard-of-care (SoC) treatment were consecutively enrolled from July 2021 to December 2022. Based on baseline characteristics, the patients were divided into three groups: the newly diagnosed group, the relapsed group and the refractory group. Patients in the newly diagnosed group were newly diagnosed with SLE within 4 weeks of starting belimumab. Patients in the relapse group had experienced a severe flare. Refractory patients were patients with unsatisfactory GC taper and/or disease activity control. Clinical data were collected, and disease assessments were conducted regularly. Newly diagnosed patients with SoC alone and healthy controls (HCs) were also enrolled.

          Results

          A total of 123 SLE patients were included in the analysis, with a median follow-up period of 12 months (range 3–18 months). Thirty-three out of 123 patients were newly diagnosed, 32 had relapsed disease, and 58 had refractory disease. The SLE Responder Index 4 (SRI-4) response was achieved with good tolerance by 55.77% of patients at 3 months, 56.63% at 6 months, 63.24% at 9 months, 63.64% at 12 months and 57.14% at 18 months. Serological parameters (anti-dsDNA and C3/C4), SLEDAI-2K and daily prednisone intake were improved overall and in each group. Of the three groups, the newly diagnosed group had the highest SRI-4 rate as well as the greatest improvement in serological parameters and SLEDAI-2K. Compared with newly diagnosed patients with SoC alone, the cumulative prednisone intake of newly diagnosed patients taking belimumab was significantly decreased.

          Conclusion

          Our data supported the efficacy of belimumab in Chinese SLE patients in a real-life setting. Our study also provided new evidence indicating remarkable achievement of the SRI-4 response during belimumab therapy in newly diagnosed SLE patients.

          Related collections

          Most cited references34

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Updating the American college of rheumatology revised criteria for the classification of systemic lupus erythematosus

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            The MOS 36-ltem Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36)

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Derivation and validation of the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics classification criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus.

              The Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) group revised and validated the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) classification criteria in order to improve clinical relevance, meet stringent methodology requirements, and incorporate new knowledge regarding the immunology of SLE. The classification criteria were derived from a set of 702 expert-rated patient scenarios. Recursive partitioning was used to derive an initial rule that was simplified and refined based on SLICC physician consensus. The SLICC group validated the classification criteria in a new validation sample of 690 new expert-rated patient scenarios. Seventeen criteria were identified. In the derivation set, the SLICC classification criteria resulted in fewer misclassifications compared with the current ACR classification criteria (49 versus 70; P = 0.0082) and had greater sensitivity (94% versus 86%; P < 0.0001) and equal specificity (92% versus 93%; P = 0.39). In the validation set, the SLICC classification criteria resulted in fewer misclassifications compared with the current ACR classification criteria (62 versus 74; P = 0.24) and had greater sensitivity (97% versus 83%; P < 0.0001) but lower specificity (84% versus 96%; P < 0.0001). The new SLICC classification criteria performed well in a large set of patient scenarios rated by experts. According to the SLICC rule for the classification of SLE, the patient must satisfy at least 4 criteria, including at least one clinical criterion and one immunologic criterion OR the patient must have biopsy-proven lupus nephritis in the presence of antinuclear antibodies or anti-double-stranded DNA antibodies. Copyright © 2012 by the American College of Rheumatology.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Rheumatology
                Oxford University Press (OUP)
                1462-0324
                1462-0332
                November 27 2023
                November 27 2023
                Article
                10.1093/rheumatology/kead629
                7104c468-76c9-41d5-acfb-3fdc4c39faa4
                © 2023

                https://academic.oup.com/pages/standard-publication-reuse-rights

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article