30
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Onset rivalry: the initial dominance phase is independent of ongoing perceptual alternations

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Binocular rivalry has been used to study a wide range of visual processes, from the integration of low-level features to the selection of signals that reach awareness. However, many of these studies do not distinguish between early and late phases of rivalry. There is clear evidence that the “onset” stage of rivalry is characterized by stable, yet idiosyncratic biases that are not evident in the average dominance of sustained rivalry viewing. Low-level stimulus features also have robust effects in the onset phase that are not seen in sustained rivalry, suggesting these phases may be driven at least partly by different neural mechanisms. The effects of high-level cognitive and affective factors at onset are less clear but also show differences from their effects in sustained viewing. These findings have important implications for the interpretation of any rivalry experiments using brief presentation paradigms and for understanding how the brain copes with binocular discrepancies in natural viewing conditions in which our eyes constantly move around an ever-changing environment. This review will summarize current research and explore the factors influencing this “onset” stage.

          Related collections

          Most cited references53

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Visual competition.

          Binocular rivalry--the alternations in perception that occur when different images are presented to the two eyes--has been the subject of intensive investigation for more than 160 years. The psychophysical properties of binocular rivalry have been well described, but newer imaging and electrophysiological techniques have not resolved the issue of where in the brain rivalry occurs. The most recent evidence supports a view of rivalry as a series of processes, each of which is implemented by neural mechanisms at different levels of the visual hierarchy. Although unanswered questions remain, this view of rivalry might allow us to resolve some of the controversies and apparent contradictions that have emerged from its study.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Continuous flash suppression reduces negative afterimages.

            Illusions that produce perceptual suppression despite constant retinal input are used to manipulate visual consciousness. Here we report on a powerful variant of existing techniques, continuous flash suppression. Distinct images flashed successively at approximately 10 Hz into one eye reliably suppress an image presented to the other eye. The duration of perceptual suppression is at least ten times greater than that produced by binocular rivalry. Using this tool we show that the strength of the negative afterimage of an adaptor was reduced by half when it was perceptually suppressed by input from the other eye. The more completely the adaptor was suppressed, the more strongly the afterimage intensity was reduced. Paradoxically, trial-to-trial visibility of the adaptor did not correlate with the degree of reduction. Our results imply that formation of afterimages involves neuronal structures that access input from both eyes but that do not correspond directly to the neuronal correlates of perceptual awareness.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Neural bases of binocular rivalry.

              During binocular rivalry, conflicting monocular images compete for access to consciousness in a stochastic, dynamical fashion. Recent human neuroimaging and psychophysical studies suggest that rivalry entails competitive interactions at multiple neural sites, including sites that retain eye-selective information. Rivalry greatly suppresses activity in the ventral pathway and attenuates visual adaptation to form and motion; nonetheless, some information about the suppressed stimulus reaches higher brain areas. Although rivalry depends on low-level inhibitory interactions, high-level excitatory influences promoting perceptual grouping and selective attention can extend the local dominance of a stimulus over space and time. Inhibitory and excitatory circuits considered within a hybrid model might account for the paradoxical properties of binocular rivalry and provide insights into the neural bases of visual awareness itself.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Front Hum Neurosci
                Front. Hum. Neurosci.
                Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
                Frontiers Research Foundation
                1662-5161
                05 December 2011
                2011
                : 5
                : 140
                Affiliations
                [1] 1simplePsychological Sciences, University of Melbourne Parkville, VIC, Australia
                [2] 2simpleDepartment of Psychology, Harvard University Cambridge, MA, USA
                [3] 3simpleLaboratoire Psychologie de la Perception, Université Paris Descartes Paris, France
                Author notes

                Edited by: Naotsugu Tsuchiya, RIKEN, Japan

                Reviewed by: Randolph Blake, Seoul National University, South Korea Jan Brascamp, Vanderbilt University, USA

                *Correspondence: Jody Stanley, Psychological Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia. e-mail: jodys@ 123456unimelb.edu.au
                Article
                10.3389/fnhum.2011.00140
                3258971
                22319483
                710e5cce-a7fb-417c-a8e8-c5d6510b1eae
                Copyright © 2011 Stanley, Forte, Cavanagh and Carter.

                This is an open-access article subject to a non-exclusive license between the authors and Frontiers Media SA, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in other forums, provided the original authors and source are credited and other Frontiers conditions are complied with.

                History
                : 01 August 2011
                : 01 November 2011
                Page count
                Figures: 3, Tables: 1, Equations: 0, References: 64, Pages: 9, Words: 0
                Categories
                Neuroscience
                Review Article

                Neurosciences
                suppression,awareness,binocular rivalry,visual field,vision,ambiguity,perceptual bias,bistable stimuli

                Comments

                Comment on this article