14
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Eco-Friendly Feed Formulation and On-Farm Feed Production as Ways to Reduce the Environmental Impacts of Pig Production Without Consequences on Animal Performance

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Animal feeding has a major contribution to the environmental impacts of pig production. One potential way to mitigate such effects is to incorporate an assessment of these impacts in the feed formulation process. The objective of this study was to test the ability of innovative formulation methodologies to reduce the impacts of pig production while also taking into account possible effects on growth performance. We compared three different formulation methodologies: least-cost formulation, in accordance with standard practices on commercial farms; multiobjective (MO) formulation, which considered feed cost and environmental impacts as calculated by life cycle assessment (LCA); and MO formulation, which prioritized locally produced feed ingredients to reduce the impact of transport. Ninety-six pigs were distributed between three experimental groups, with pigs individually weighted and fed using an automatic feeding system from 40 to 115 kg body weight. Based on the experimental results, six categories of impacts were evaluated: climate change (CC), demand in non-renewable energy (NRE), acidification (AC), eutrophication (EU), land occupation (LO), and phosphorus demand (PD), at both feed plant gate and farm gate, with 1 kg of feed and 1 kg of live pig as functional units, respectively. At feed level, MO formulations reduced CC, NRE, AC, and PD impacts but sometimes increased LO and EU impacts. These formulations reduced the proportion of cereals and oil meals into feeds (feed ingredients with high impacts), while the proportion of alternative protein sources, like peas, faba beans, or high-protein agricultural coproducts increased (feed ingredients with low impacts). Overall, animal performance was not affected by the dietary treatment; because of this, the general pattern of results obtained with either MO formulation at farm gate was similar to that obtained at feed level. Thus, MO diet formulation represents an efficient way to reduce the environmental impacts of pig production without compromising animal performance.

          Related collections

          Most cited references36

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The ecoinvent database version 3 (part I): overview and methodology

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Scenario-based environmental assessment of farming systems: the case of pig production in France

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              InraPorc: A model and decision support tool for the nutrition of growing pigs

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Vet Sci
                Front Vet Sci
                Front. Vet. Sci.
                Frontiers in Veterinary Science
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                2297-1769
                06 July 2021
                2021
                : 8
                : 689012
                Affiliations
                [1] 1PEGASE, INRAE, Institut Agro , Saint-Gilles, France
                [2] 2SAS, INRAE, Institut Agro , Rennes, France
                Author notes

                Edited by: Claudio Forte, University of Turin, Italy

                Reviewed by: Daniela Lovarelli, University of Milan, Italy; Valentino Bontempo, University of Milan, Italy

                *Correspondence: Francine de Quelen francine.dequelen@ 123456inrae.fr

                This article was submitted to Animal Nutrition and Metabolism, a section of the journal Frontiers in Veterinary Science

                Article
                10.3389/fvets.2021.689012
                8289902
                34295934
                7161d012-b831-43bf-8471-ae678d1221fc
                Copyright © 2021 de Quelen, Brossard, Wilfart, Dourmad and Garcia-Launay.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 31 March 2021
                : 31 May 2021
                Page count
                Figures: 2, Tables: 4, Equations: 7, References: 36, Pages: 14, Words: 10004
                Categories
                Veterinary Science
                Original Research

                life cycle assesment,multiobjective formulation,local feed ingredients,low-impact feed,pig fattening

                Comments

                Comment on this article