7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Machine Learning of Infant Spontaneous Movements for the Early Prediction of Cerebral Palsy: A Multi-Site Cohort Study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background: Early identification of cerebral palsy (CP) during infancy will provide opportunities for early therapies and treatments. The aim of the present study was to present a novel machine-learning model, the Computer-based Infant Movement Assessment (CIMA) model, for clinically feasible early CP prediction based on infant video recordings. Methods: The CIMA model was designed to assess the proportion (%) of CP risk-related movements using a time–frequency decomposition of the movement trajectories of the infant’s body parts. The CIMA model was developed and tested on video recordings from a cohort of 377 high-risk infants at 9–15 weeks corrected age to predict CP status and motor function (ambulatory vs. non-ambulatory) at mean 3.7 years age. The performance of the model was compared with results of the general movement assessment (GMA) and neonatal imaging. Results: The CIMA model had sensitivity (92.7%) and specificity (81.6%), which was comparable to observational GMA or neonatal cerebral imaging for the prediction of CP. Infants later found to have non-ambulatory CP had significantly more CP risk-related movements (median: 92.8%, p = 0.02) compared with those with ambulatory CP (median: 72.7%). Conclusion: The CIMA model may be a clinically feasible alternative to observational GMA.

          Related collections

          Most cited references30

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          A report: the definition and classification of cerebral palsy April 2006.

          For a variety of reasons, the definition and the classification of cerebral palsy (CP) need to be reconsidered. Modern brain imaging techniques have shed new light on the nature of the underlying brain injury and studies on the neurobiology of and pathology associated with brain development have further explored etiologic mechanisms. It is now recognized that assessing the extent of activity restriction is part of CP evaluation and that people without activity restriction should not be included in the CP rubric. Also, previous definitions have not given sufficient prominence to the non-motor neurodevelopmental disabilities of performance and behaviour that commonly accompany CP, nor to the progression of musculoskeletal difficulties that often occurs with advancing age. In order to explore this information, pertinent material was reviewed on July 11-13, 2004 at an international workshop in Bethesda, MD (USA) organized by an Executive Committee and participated in by selected leaders in the preclinical and clinical sciences. At the workshop, it was agreed that the concept 'cerebral palsy' should be retained. Suggestions were made about the content of a revised definition and classification of CP that would meet the needs of clinicians, investigators, health officials, families and the public and would provide a common language for improved communication. Panels organized by the Executive Committee used this information and additional comments from the international community to generate a report on the Definition and Classification of Cerebral Palsy, April 2006. The Executive Committee presents this report with the intent of providing a common conceptualization of CP for use by a broad international audience.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            An update on the prevalence of cerebral palsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

            The aim of this study was to provide a comprehensive update on (1) the overall prevalence of cerebral palsy (CP); (2) the prevalence of CP in relation to birthweight; and (3) the prevalence of CP in relation to gestational age. A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted and reported, based on the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) statement. Population-based studies on the prevalence of CP in children born in 1985 or after were selected. Statistical analysis was carried out using computer package R, version 2.14. A total of 49 studies were selected for this review. The pooled overall prevalence of CP was 2.11 per 1000 live births (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.98-2.25). The prevalence of CP stratified by gestational age group showed the highest pooled prevalence to be in children weighing 1000 to 1499g at birth (59.18 per 1000 live births; 95% CI 53.06-66.01), although there was no significant difference on pairwise meta-regression with children weighing less than 1000g. The prevalence of CP expressed by gestational age was highest in children born before 28 weeks' gestation (111.80 per 1000 live births; 95% CI 69.53-179.78; p<0.0327). The overall prevalence of CP has remained constant in recent years despite increased survival of at-risk preterm infants. © The Authors. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology © 2013 Mac Keith Press.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Early, Accurate Diagnosis and Early Intervention in Cerebral Palsy: Advances in Diagnosis and Treatment.

              Cerebral palsy describes the most common physical disability in childhood and occurs in 1 in 500 live births. Historically, the diagnosis has been made between age 12 and 24 months but now can be made before 6 months' corrected age.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Clin Med
                J Clin Med
                jcm
                Journal of Clinical Medicine
                MDPI
                2077-0383
                18 December 2019
                January 2020
                : 9
                : 1
                : 5
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7491 Trondheim, Norway; espen.ihlen@ 123456ntnu.no
                [2 ]Department of Neonatology, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, 7006 Trondheim, Norway; ragnhild.stoen@ 123456ntnu.no
                [3 ]Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7491 Trondheim, Norway; Toril.Fjortoft@ 123456stolav.no
                [4 ]Ann and Robert H Lurie Children’s Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60611, USA; LBoswell@ 123456luriechildrens.org (L.B.); r-deregnier@ 123456northwestern.edu (R.-A.d.R.)
                [5 ]Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611, USA; dgaebler@ 123456sralab.org (D.G.-S.); colleen.peyton1@ 123456northwestern.edu (C.P.)
                [6 ]Clinic of Clinical Services, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, 7006 Trondheim, Norway; randi.tynes.vagen@ 123456stolav.no
                [7 ]Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
                [8 ]Department of Clinical Therapeutic Services, University Hospital of North Norway, 9038 Tromsø, Norway; Cathrine.Labori@ 123456unn.no (C.L.); gunn.kristin.oeberg@ 123456uit.no (G.K.Ø.)
                [9 ]Department of Pediatrics, Division of Paediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, 0372 Oslo, Norway; Marianne.loennecken@ 123456gmail.com (M.C.L.); umoinich@ 123456ous-hf.no (U.I.M.); isilberg@ 123456ous-hf.no (I.E.S.)
                [10 ]University of Chicago Medicine, Comer Children’s Hospital, Section of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, Chicago, IL 60637, USA; mmsall@ 123456peds.bsd.uchicago.edu (M.E.M.); mschreiber@ 123456peds.bsd.uchicago.edu (M.D.S.)
                [11 ]University of Chicago, Kennedy Research Center on Intellectual and Neurodevelopmental Disabilities, Chicago, IL 60637, USA
                [12 ]Department of Pediatrics, Comer Children’s Hospital, Department of Physical Therapy and Human Movement Science, Chicago, IL 60637, USA
                [13 ]Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, University Hospital of North Norway, 9038 Tromsø, Norway; Nils.Thomas.Songstad@ 123456unn.no
                [14 ]Department of Health and Care Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT- The Arctic University of Norway, 9019 Tromsø, Norway
                Author notes
                [* ]Correspondence: lars.adde@ 123456ntnu.no ; Tel.: +47-91897615
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9022-3050
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2037-5769
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4753-7246
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1934-3105
                Article
                jcm-09-00005
                10.3390/jcm9010005
                7019773
                31861380
                71c69c62-876d-41d1-a891-fb9c928adeb0
                © 2019 by the authors.

                Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 22 October 2019
                : 16 December 2019
                Categories
                Article

                cerebral palsy,premature infants,general movement assessment,machine learning

                Comments

                Comment on this article