3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Differing effects of beta-blockers on long-term clinical outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention between patients with mid-range and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          The aim of this study was to determine the difference in effects of beta-blockers on long-term clinical outcomes between ischemic heart disease (IHD) patients with mid-range ejection fraction (mrEF) and those with reduced ejection fraction (rEF).

          Methods

          Data were assessed of 3508 consecutive IHD patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) between 1997 and 2011. Among them, 316 patients with mrEF (EF = 40–49%) and 201 patients with rEF (EF < 40%) were identified. They were assigned to groups according to users and non-users of beta-blockers and effects of beta-blockers were assessed between mrEF and rEF patients, separately. The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause death and non-fatal acute coronary syndrome.

          Results

          The median follow-up period was 5.5 years in mrEF patients and 4.3 years in rEF patients. Cumulative event-free survival was significantly lower in the group with beta-blockers than in the group without beta-blockers in rEF ( p = 0.003), whereas no difference was observed in mrEF ( p = 0.137) between those with and without beta-blockers. In the multivariate analysis, use of beta-blockers was associated with reduction in clinical outcomes in patients with rEF (hazard ratio (HR), 0.59; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.36–0.97; p = 0.036), whereas no association was observed among those with mrEF (HR 0.74; 95% CI 0.49–1.10; p = 0.137).

          Conclusions

          Our observational study showed that use of beta-blockers was not associated with long-term clinical outcomes in IHD patients with mrEF, whereas a significant association was observed in those with rEF.

          Related collections

          Most cited references23

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          2017 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Revised equations for estimated GFR from serum creatinine in Japan.

            Estimation of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is limited by differences in creatinine generation among ethnicities. Our previously reported GFR-estimating equations for Japanese had limitations because all participants had a GFR less than 90 mL/min/1.73 m2 and serum creatinine was assayed in different laboratories. Diagnostic test study using a prospective cross-sectional design. New equations were developed in 413 participants and validated in 350 participants. All samples were assayed in a central laboratory. Hospitalized Japanese patients in 80 medical centers. Patients had not participated in the previous study. Measured GFR (mGFR) computed from inulin clearance. Estimated GFR (eGFR) by using the modified isotope dilution mass spectrometry (IDMS)-traceable 4-variable Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) Study equation using the previous Japanese Society of Nephrology Chronic Kidney Disease Initiative (JSN-CKDI) coefficient of 0.741 (equation 1), the previous JSN-CKDI equation (equation 2), and new equations derived in the development data set: modified MDRD Study using a new Japanese coefficient (equation 3), and a 3-variable Japanese equation (equation 4). Performance of equations was assessed by means of bias (eGFR - mGFR), accuracy (percentage of estimates within 15% or 30% of mGFR), root mean squared error, and correlation coefficient. In the development data set, the new Japanese coefficient was 0.808 (95% confidence interval, 0.728 to 0.829) for the IDMS-MDRD Study equation (equation 3), and the 3-variable Japanese equation (equation 4) was eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2) = 194 x Serum creatinine(-1.094) x Age(-0.287) x 0.739 (if female). In the validation data set, bias was -1.3 +/- 19.4 versus -5.9 +/- 19.0 mL/min/1.73 m2 (P = 0.002), and accuracy within 30% of mGFR was 73% versus 72% (P = 0.6) for equation 3 versus equation 1 and -2.1 +/- 19.0 versus -7.9 +/- 18.7 mL/min/1.73 m(2) (P < 0.001) and 75% versus 73% (P = 0.06) for equation 4 versus equation 2 (P = 0.06), respectively. Most study participants had chronic kidney disease, and some may have had changing GFRs. The new Japanese coefficient for the modified IDMS-MDRD Study equation and the new Japanese equation are more accurate for the Japanese population than the previously reported equations.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Universal definition of myocardial infarction.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                kasai-t@mx6.nisiq.net
                Journal
                BMC Cardiovasc Disord
                BMC Cardiovasc Disord
                BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
                BioMed Central (London )
                1471-2261
                15 January 2021
                15 January 2021
                2021
                : 21
                : 36
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.258269.2, ISNI 0000 0004 1762 2738, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, , Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, ; 2-1-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8421 Japan
                [2 ]GRID grid.258269.2, ISNI 0000 0004 1762 2738, Cardiovascular Respiratory Sleep Medicine, , Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, ; 2-1-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8421 Japan
                [3 ]GRID grid.411966.d, Sleep and Sleep Disordered Breathing Center, , Juntendo University Hospital, ; 2-1-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8421 Japan
                [4 ]GRID grid.482667.9, Department of Cardiology, , Juntendo University Shizuoka Hospital, ; 1129 Nagaoka, Izunokuni, Shizuoka 410-2295 Japan
                Article
                1850
                10.1186/s12872-021-01850-9
                7809870
                33446110
                7232c8c4-274d-40d3-a65b-e41b6d111374
                © The Author(s) 2021

                Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

                History
                : 12 November 2020
                : 1 January 2021
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2021

                Cardiovascular Medicine
                beta-blocker,ischemic heart disease,mid-range ejection fraction,reduced ejection fraction

                Comments

                Comment on this article