Efficacy and adverse events of EMR and endoscopic submucosal dissection for the treatment of colon neoplasms: a meta-analysis of studies comparing EMR and endoscopic submucosal dissection.

There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

Abstract

EMR and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) are used frequently to remove colon neoplasms. However, the predominance of these procedures has not yet been thoroughly explored.

Related collections

Author and article information

Journal

Journal ID (iso-abbrev): Gastrointest. Endosc.

Title: Gastrointestinal endoscopy

ISSN (Electronic): 1097-6779

ISSN (Print): 0016-5107

Publication date (Electronic): Mar 2015

Volume: 81

Issue: 3

Affiliations

[1 ] Division of Gastroenterology and Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Asahikawa Medical University, Asahikawa, Hokkaido, Japan.

Article

Publisher Item ID: S0016-5107(14)01983-X

DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.07.034

PubMed ID: 25592748

SO-VID: 7435caba-b2e6-44c9-9958-d3a6629b039a

History

Data availability:

Efficacy and adverse events of EMR and endoscopic submucosal dissection for the treatment of colon neoplasms: a meta-analysis of studies comparing EMR and endoscopic submucosal dissection.

Read this article at

Abstract

Related collections

Efficacy of Communicating Science

Author and article information

Journal

Affiliations

Article

History

Comments

Comment on this article

Cited by 73