20
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      PSMA Theranostics: Review of the Current Status of PSMA-Targeted Imaging and Radioligand Therapy

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) has been the subject of extensive investigation in the past two decades as a promising molecular target for prostate cancer (PCa). Its appealing molecular features have enabled the development of a novel diagnostic and therapeutic—thus “theranostic”—approach to PCa. There is now substantial evidence of the high sensitivity of PSMA-targeted imaging for PCa lesions and growing evidence of the therapeutic efficacy of PSMA radioligand therapy for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. This article presents a broad overview of the current status of PSMA theranostics, including current evidence, potential clinical impact, and active areas of research.

          Related collections

          Most cited references53

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          German Multicenter Study Investigating 177Lu-PSMA-617 Radioligand Therapy in Advanced Prostate Cancer Patients.

          (177)Lu-labeled PSMA-617 is a promising new therapeutic agent for radioligand therapy (RLT) of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Initiated by the German Society of Nuclear Medicine, a retrospective multicenter data analysis was started in 2015 to evaluate efficacy and safety of (177)Lu-PSMA-617 in a large cohort of patients.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The diagnostic accuracy of CT and MRI in the staging of pelvic lymph nodes in patients with prostate cancer: a meta-analysis.

            To compare the diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the diagnosis of lymph node metastases in prostate cancer. After a comprehensive literature search, studies were included that allowed construction of contingency tables for detection of lymph node metastases using CT or MRI. In addition, a summary receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed. A total of 24 studies were included. For CT, pooled sensitivity was 0.42 (0.26-0.56 95% CI) and pooled specificity was 0.82 (0.8-0.83 95% CI). For MRI, the pooled sensitivity was 0.39 (0.22-0.56 95% CI) and pooled specificity was 0.82 (0.79-0.83 95% CI). The differences in performance of CT and MRI were not statistically significant. CT and MRI demonstrate an equally poor performance in the detection of lymph node metastases from prostate cancer. Reliance on either CT or MRI will misrepresent the patient's true status regarding nodal metastases, and thus misdirect the therapeutic strategies offered to the patient.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Assessment of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET Accuracy in Localizing Recurrent Prostate Cancer

              In retrospective studies, 68Ga-PSMA-11 positron emission tomographic (PET) imaging improves detection of biochemically recurrent prostate cancer compared with conventional imaging.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Cancers (Basel)
                Cancers (Basel)
                cancers
                Cancers
                MDPI
                2072-6694
                26 May 2020
                June 2020
                : 12
                : 6
                : 1367
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Internal Medicine, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA 70112, USA; wjones20@ 123456tulane.edu
                [2 ]Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21231, USA; kgriff43@ 123456jhmi.edu
                [3 ]Department of Hematology-Oncology, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA 70112, USA
                Author notes
                [* ]Correspondence: pbarata@ 123456tulane.edu (P.C.B.); cpaller1@ 123456jhmi.edu (C.J.P.)
                [†]

                Denotes equal contribution.

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8890-2951
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3658-1858
                Article
                cancers-12-01367
                10.3390/cancers12061367
                7352725
                32466595
                74ef319d-8bb1-4b44-a8cf-38f783254c84
                © 2020 by the authors.

                Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 22 April 2020
                : 22 May 2020
                Categories
                Review

                prostate specific membrane antigen,theranostics,prostate cancer

                Comments

                Comment on this article