6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Stress reactivity as a putative mechanism linking childhood trauma with clinical outcomes in individuals at ultra-high-risk for psychosis: Findings from the EU-GEI High Risk Study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Aims

          Childhood trauma is associated with an elevated risk for psychosis, but the psychological mechanisms involved remain largely unclear. This study aimed to investigate emotional and psychotic stress reactivity in daily life as a putative mechanism linking childhood trauma and clinical outcomes in individuals at ultra-high-risk (UHR) for psychosis.

          Methods

          Experience sampling methodology was used to measure momentary stress, affect and psychotic experiences in the daily life of N = 79 UHR individuals in the EU-GEI High Risk Study. The Childhood Trauma Questionnaire was used to assess self-reported childhood trauma. Clinical outcomes were assessed at baseline, 1- and 2-year follow-up.

          Results

          The association of stress with positive ( β = −0.14, p = 0.010) and negative affect ( β = 0.11, p = 0.020) was modified by transition status such that stress reactivity was greater in individuals who transitioned to psychosis. Moreover, the association of stress with negative affect ( β = 0.06, p = 0.019) and psychotic experiences ( β = 0.05, p = 0.037) was greater in individuals exposed to high v. low levels of childhood trauma. We also found evidence that decreased positive affect in response to stress was associated with reduced functioning at 1-year follow-up ( B = 6.29, p = 0.034). In addition, there was evidence that the association of childhood trauma with poor functional outcomes was mediated by stress reactivity (e.g. indirect effect: B = −2.13, p = 0.026), but no evidence that stress reactivity mediated the association between childhood trauma and transition (e.g. indirect effect: B = 0.14, p = 0.506).

          Conclusions

          Emotional and psychotic stress reactivity may be potential mechanisms linking childhood trauma with clinical outcomes in UHR individuals.

          Related collections

          Most cited references78

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Ecological Momentary Assessment

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Development and validation of a brief screening version of the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire.

            The goal of this study was to develop and validate a short form of the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (the CTQ-SF) as a screening measure for maltreatment histories in both clinical and nonreferred groups. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses of the 70 original CTQ items were used to create a 28-item version of the scale (25 clinical items and three validity items) and test the measurement invariance of the 25 clinical items across four samples: 378 adult substance abusing patients from New York City, 396 adolescent psychiatric inpatients, 625 substance abusing individuals from southwest Texas, and 579 individuals from a normative community sample (combined N=1978). Results showed that the CTQ-SF's items held essentially the same meaning across all four samples (i.e., measurement invariance). Moreover, the scale demonstrated good criterion-related validity in a subsample of adolescents on whom corroborative data were available. These findings support the viability of the CTQ-SF across diverse clinical and nonreferred populations.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Childhood Adversities Increase the Risk of Psychosis: A Meta-analysis of Patient-Control, Prospective- and Cross-sectional Cohort Studies

              Evidence suggests that adverse experiences in childhood are associated with psychosis. To examine the association between childhood adversity and trauma (sexual abuse, physical abuse, emotional/psychological abuse, neglect, parental death, and bullying) and psychosis outcome, MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsychINFO, and Web of Science were searched from January 1980 through November 2011. We included prospective cohort studies, large-scale cross-sectional studies investigating the association between childhood adversity and psychotic symptoms or illness, case-control studies comparing the prevalence of adverse events between psychotic patients and controls using dichotomous or continuous measures, and case-control studies comparing the prevalence of psychotic symptoms between exposed and nonexposed subjects using dichotomous or continuous measures of adversity and psychosis. The analysis included 18 case-control studies (n = 2048 psychotic patients and 1856 nonpsychiatric controls), 10 prospective and quasi-prospective studies (n = 41 803) and 8 population-based cross-sectional studies (n = 35 546). There were significant associations between adversity and psychosis across all research designs, with an overall effect of OR = 2.78 (95% CI = 2.34–3.31). The integration of the case-control studies indicated that patients with psychosis were 2.72 times more likely to have been exposed to childhood adversity than controls (95% CI = 1.90–3.88). The association between childhood adversity and psychosis was also significant in population-based cross-sectional studies (OR = 2.99 [95% CI = 2.12–4.20]) as well as in prospective and quasi-prospective studies (OR = 2.75 [95% CI = 2.17–3.47]). The estimated population attributable risk was 33% (16%–47%). These findings indicate that childhood adversity is strongly associated with increased risk for psychosis.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci
                Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci
                EPS
                Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences
                Cambridge University Press (Cambridge, UK )
                2045-7960
                2045-7979
                2021
                28 May 2021
                : 30
                : e40
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Public Mental Health, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University , Mannheim, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
                [2 ]Department of Neurosciences, Center for Contextual Psychiatry, KU Leuven , Leuven, Flanders, Belgium
                [3 ]Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne , Parkville, Victoria, Australia
                [4 ]Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health , Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
                [5 ]Department of Psychiatry, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai , New York, NY, USA
                [6 ]Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC, University of Amsterdam , Amsterdam, North Holland, Netherlands
                [7 ]Arkin, Institute for Mental Health , Amsterdam, North Holland, Netherlands
                [8 ]Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, Maastricht University School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences , Maastricht, Limburg, Netherlands
                [9 ]Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, King's Health Partners, King's College London , London, UK
                [10 ]Department of Psychiatry, Brain Center Rudolf Magnus, Utrecht University Medical Centre, Utrecht , Utrecht, Netherlands
                [11 ]ESRC Centre for Society and Mental Health and Social Epidemiology Research Group, King's College London , London, UK
                [12 ]Health Service and Population Research Department, Centre for Epidemiology and Public Health, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London , London, UK
                [13 ]Department of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, Vrije Universiteit , Amsterdam, North Holland, Netherlands
                [14 ]Department of Psychosis Research, Parnassia Psychiatric Institute , The Hague, South Holland, Netherlands
                [15 ]Department of Early Psychosis, Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC, University of Amsterdam , Amsterdam, North Holland, Netherlands
                [16 ]Psychology Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London , London, UK
                [17 ]NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust , London, UK
                Author notes
                Author for correspondence: Ulrich Reininghaus, E-mail: ulrich.reininghaus@ 123456zi-mannheim.de
                [*]

                A full list of authors and affiliations appears in the Appendix.

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4054-4331
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7245-1586
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1386-2369
                Article
                S2045796021000251
                10.1017/S2045796021000251
                8193966
                34044905
                750e7fc0-0bcd-475f-9790-15642ce3e5f8
                © The Author(s) 2021

                This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.

                History
                : 17 August 2020
                : 19 March 2021
                : 04 April 2021
                Page count
                Tables: 4, References: 81, Pages: 13
                Categories
                Original Article

                at-risk mental state,childhood abuse,transition,stress sensitization,ecological momentary assessment (ema),experience sampling method (esm)

                Comments

                Comment on this article