27
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Exploration versus exploitation in space, mind, and society.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Search is a ubiquitous property of life. Although diverse domains have worked on search problems largely in isolation, recent trends across disciplines indicate that the formal properties of these problems share similar structures and, often, similar solutions. Moreover, internal search (e.g., memory search) shows similar characteristics to external search (e.g., spatial foraging), including shared neural mechanisms consistent with a common evolutionary origin across species. Search problems and their solutions also scale from individuals to societies, underlying and constraining problem solving, memory, information search, and scientific and cultural innovation. In summary, search represents a core feature of cognition, with a vast influence on its evolution and processes across contexts and requiring input from multiple domains to understand its implications and scope.

          Related collections

          Most cited references78

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Cellular basis of working memory

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Inverted-U-shaped dopamine actions on human working memory and cognitive control.

            Brain dopamine (DA) has long been implicated in cognitive control processes, including working memory. However, the precise role of DA in cognition is not well-understood, partly because there is large variability in the response to dopaminergic drugs both across different behaviors and across different individuals. We review evidence from a series of studies with experimental animals, healthy humans, and patients with Parkinson's disease, which highlight two important factors that contribute to this large variability. First, the existence of an optimum DA level for cognitive function implicates the need to take into account baseline levels of DA when isolating the effects of DA. Second, cognitive control is a multifactorial phenomenon, requiring a dynamic balance between cognitive stability and cognitive flexibility. These distinct components might implicate the prefrontal cortex and the striatum, respectively. Manipulating DA will thus have paradoxical consequences for distinct cognitive control processes, depending on distinct basal or optimal levels of DA in different brain regions. Copyright © 2011 Society of Biological Psychiatry. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The cognitive neuroscience of constructive memory: remembering the past and imagining the future.

              Episodic memory is widely conceived as a fundamentally constructive, rather than reproductive, process that is prone to various kinds of errors and illusions. With a view towards examining the functions served by a constructive episodic memory system, we consider recent neuropsychological and neuroimaging studies indicating that some types of memory distortions reflect the operation of adaptive processes. An important function of a constructive episodic memory is to allow individuals to simulate or imagine future episodes, happenings and scenarios. Since the future is not an exact repetition of the past, simulation of future episodes requires a system that can draw on the past in a manner that flexibly extracts and recombines elements of previous experiences. Consistent with this constructive episodic simulation hypothesis, we consider cognitive, neuropsychological and neuroimaging evidence showing that there is considerable overlap in the psychological and neural processes involved in remembering the past and imagining the future.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Trends Cogn. Sci. (Regul. Ed.)
                Trends in cognitive sciences
                1879-307X
                1364-6613
                Jan 2015
                : 19
                : 1
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Department of Psychology, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK. Electronic address: t.t.hills@warwick.ac.uk.
                [2 ] Cognitive Science Program, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA.
                [3 ] Department of Political Science, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA; College of Computer and Information Science, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Kennedy School, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.
                [4 ] Department of Neuroscience, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
                [5 ] Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA; Department of Collective Behaviour, Max Planck Institute of Ornithology, Konstanz, Germany.
                Article
                S1364-6613(14)00233-2 NIHMS680820
                10.1016/j.tics.2014.10.004
                4410143
                25487706
                7536da3b-d4e0-452c-862a-29c3897aedcd
                Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article