14
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Withdrawal of pharmacological treatment for heart failure in patients with recovered dilated cardiomyopathy (TRED-HF): an open-label, pilot, randomised trial

      research-article
      , PhD a , b , , MSc a , , BMBCh a , b , , MBBS a , b , , PhD d , , MSc d , , MSc a , , BSc a , , DCR a , , PhD a , , MD a , , PhD a , b , , MD a , , BSc a , b , , PhD a , b , c , , MD e , , PhD f , , MD a , , Prof, PhD a , b , c , g , , PhD a , b , c , , PhD a , b , , Prof, MD a , b , , MD a , b , h , , Prof, MD a , b , , Prof, MD a , b , i , , MD a , b , *
      Lancet (London, England)
      Elsevier

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Summary

          Background

          Patients with dilated cardiomyopathy whose symptoms and cardiac function have recovered often ask whether their medications can be stopped. The safety of withdrawing treatment in this situation is unknown.

          Methods

          We did an open-label, pilot, randomised trial to examine the effect of phased withdrawal of heart failure medications in patients with previous dilated cardiomyopathy who were now asymptomatic, whose left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) had improved from less than 40% to 50% or greater, whose left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) had normalised, and who had an N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-pro-BNP) concentration less than 250 ng/L. Patients were recruited from a network of hospitals in the UK, assessed at one centre (Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK), and randomly assigned (1:1) to phased withdrawal or continuation of treatment. After 6 months, patients in the continued treatment group had treatment withdrawn by the same method. The primary endpoint was a relapse of dilated cardiomyopathy within 6 months, defined by a reduction in LVEF of more than 10% and to less than 50%, an increase in LVEDV by more than 10% and to higher than the normal range, a two-fold rise in NT-pro-BNP concentration and to more than 400 ng/L, or clinical evidence of heart failure, at which point treatments were re-established. The primary analysis was by intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02859311.

          Findings

          Between April 21, 2016, and Aug 22, 2017, 51 patients were enrolled. 25 were randomly assigned to the treatment withdrawal group and 26 to continue treatment. Over the first 6 months, 11 (44%) patients randomly assigned to treatment withdrawal met the primary endpoint of relapse compared with none of those assigned to continue treatment (Kaplan-Meier estimate of event rate 45·7% [95% CI 28·5–67·2]; p=0·0001). After 6 months, 25 (96%) of 26 patients assigned initially to continue treatment attempted its withdrawal. During the following 6 months, nine patients met the primary endpoint of relapse (Kaplan-Meier estimate of event rate 36·0% [95% CI 20·6–57·8]). No deaths were reported in either group and three serious adverse events were reported in the treatment withdrawal group: hospital admissions for non-cardiac chest pain, sepsis, and an elective procedure.

          Interpretation

          Many patients deemed to have recovered from dilated cardiomyopathy will relapse following treatment withdrawal. Until robust predictors of relapse are defined, treatment should continue indefinitely.

          Funding

          British Heart Foundation, Alexander Jansons Foundation, Royal Brompton Hospital and Imperial College London, Imperial College Biomedical Research Centre, Wellcome Trust, and Rosetrees Trust.

          Related collections

          Most cited references18

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Beta-blockers for heart failure with reduced, mid-range, and preserved ejection fraction: an individual patient-level analysis of double-blind randomized trials

          Recent guidelines recommend that patients with heart failure and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) 40-49% should be managed similar to LVEF ≥ 50%. We investigated the effect of beta-blockers according to LVEF in double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trials.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Normalized left ventricular systolic and diastolic function by steady state free precession cardiovascular magnetic resonance.

            We used state of the art CMR to define ranges for normal left ventricular volumes and systolic/diastolic function normalized to the influence of gender, body surface area and age. New CMR normalized ranges were modeled and displayed in graphical form for clinical use, with normalization for body surface area, gender, and age. The determination of normality, or the severity of abnormality, depends on the use of the appropriate reference ranges normalized to all 3 variables. These novel data have particular importance for clinical practice and clinical trials using CMR.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Prevalence and prognostic significance of left ventricular reverse remodeling in dilated cardiomyopathy receiving tailored medical treatment.

              The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence and prognostic role of left ventricular reverse remodeling (LVRR) in idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (IDCM).
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Lancet
                Lancet
                Lancet (London, England)
                Elsevier
                0140-6736
                1474-547X
                05 January 2019
                05 January 2019
                : 393
                : 10166
                : 61-73
                Affiliations
                [a ]Cardiovascular Research Centre and Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Unit, Royal Brompton Hospital, London, UK
                [b ]National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK
                [c ]MRC London Institute of Medical Sciences, Imperial College London, London, UK
                [d ]London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
                [e ]Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London, London, UK
                [f ]Basildon and Thurrock Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Essex, UK
                [g ]National Heart Centre Singapore, Singapore
                [h ]Department of Cardiology, Ealing Hospital, London, UK
                [i ]Robertson Centre for Biostatistics, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
                Author notes
                [* ]Correspondence to: Dr Sanjay K Prasad, Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Unit, Royal Brompton Hospital, London SW3 6NP, UK s.prasad@ 123456rbht.nhs.uk
                Article
                S0140-6736(18)32484-X
                10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32484-X
                6319251
                30429050
                756c241a-bef3-4a84-bd9c-a2179a2cf775
                © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license

                This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                Categories
                Article

                Medicine
                Medicine

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_

                Similar content93

                Cited by180

                Most referenced authors876