1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Collaborative Workshops for Community Meaning-Making and Data Analyses: How Focus Groups Strengthen Data by Enhancing Understanding and Promoting Use

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Community-based participatory research is a growing approach, but often includes higher levels of community engagement in the research design and data collection stages than in the data interpretation stage. Involving study participants in this stage could further knowledge justice, science that aligns with and supports social justice agendas. This article reports on two community-based participatory environmental health surveys conducted between 2015 and 2019 in an industrial region near Marseille, France, and focuses specifically on our approach of organizing focus groups to directly involve residents and community stakeholders in the analysis and interpretation process. We found that, in these focus groups, residents triangulated across many different sources of information—study findings, local knowledge, and different types of expert knowledge—to reach conclusions about the health of their community and make recommendations for what should be done to improve community health outcomes. We conclude that involving residents in the data analysis and interpretation stage can promote epistemic justice and lead to final reports that are more useful to community stakeholders and decision-makers.

          Related collections

          Most cited references22

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Focus Group Interview: An Underutilized Research Technique for Improving Theory and Practice in Health Education

          C E Basch (1987)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The Three R's: How Community Based Participatory Research Strengthens the Rigor, Relevance and Reach of Science.

            In the last few decades, community based participatory research (CBPR) has emerged as an important approach that links environmental health and justice advocates with research institutions to understand and address environmental health problems. CBPR has generally been evaluated for its impact on policy, regulation, and its support of community science. However, there has been less emphasis on assessing the ways in which CBPR (re)shapes and potentially improves the scientific enterprise itself. This commentary focuses on this under-emphasized aspect of CBPR-how it can strengthen science. Using two case studies of environmental health CBPR research-the Northern California Exposure Study, and the San Joaquin Valley Drinking Water Study-we posit that CBPR helps improve the "3 R's"of science-rigor, relevance and reach-and in so doing benefits the scientific enterprise itself.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Rethinking the Focus Group in Media and Communications Research

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Int J Environ Res Public Health
                Int J Environ Res Public Health
                ijerph
                International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
                MDPI
                1661-7827
                1660-4601
                11 September 2019
                September 2019
                : 16
                : 18
                : 3352
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Science, Technology and Society, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 22043, USA
                [2 ]Centre Norbert Elias (UMR 85 62), Ecole des hautes études en sciences sociales, 13236 Marseille, France; leesjohanna@ 123456gmail.com (J.L.); max.jeanjean@ 123456gmail.com (M.J.)
                [3 ]Department of Public and Nonprofit Administration, University of San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94117, USA; akcohen@ 123456usfca.edu
                Author notes
                [* ]Correspondence: ballen@ 123456vt.edu
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8200-2066
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9848-934X
                Article
                ijerph-16-03352
                10.3390/ijerph16183352
                6765948
                31514327
                7582a9cd-4df1-4280-ab3a-5edfa0ac7875
                © 2019 by the authors.

                Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 16 August 2019
                : 04 September 2019
                Categories
                Article

                Public health
                community-based participatory research,data interpretation,environmental health,knowledge justice,public health,participatory science

                Comments

                Comment on this article