31
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Comparison between Branded and Generic Furosemide 40 mg Tablets Using Thermal Gravimetric Analysis and Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          A BSTRACT

          Background and Purpose:

          There has been a long-standing belief that generic drugs are of lower value in comparison to their branded name counterparts. They are in particular under scrutiny due to their low market price. Even though the reduction in costs is largely based on skipping expensive preclinical studies and clinical trials for generic drugs, the purity and quality of the raw materials in the production of generic drugs is debatable. Thus, the objective of the study was to analyze and assess the quality comparability of generic furosemide 40 mg (FSD) tablets to branded product available in the market.

          Materials and Methods:

          Quality control tests, in vitro drug release assessments, and thermal analysis investigations for both analog products of FSD were performed. Various physical parameters related to the tablet quality, such as hardness, weight variation, and friability tests, were examined. In vitro drug release behavior evaluations were conducted according to United States Pharmacopeia (USP) specifications and guidelines, whereas thermal analysis was carried out using thermal gravimetric analysis (TGA), and tablets were further evaluated by Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy.

          Results:

          The results indicated a significant variation between the two products in terms of hardness, weight variation, and friability. This could be correlated to variation appeared in thermal and spectroscopic spectra between the two products using TGA and FTIR. Drug release of FSD was slightly different between both products following incubation in different pH media (1.2, 3.0, and 6.5; 120 min), however, this was in accordance with USP dissolution requirements as < 80% of drug release was obtained within the first 30 min from each product.

          Conclusion:

          This study is a useful example for the independent investigations using thermal and spectroscopic analysis to confirm potential hidden variations between generic and branded products that could not be obtained by the bioequivalence studies.

          Related collections

          Most cited references52

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          A review of the differences and similarities between generic drugs and their originator counterparts, including economic benefits associated with usage of generic medicines, using Ireland as a case study

          Generic medicines are those where patent protection has expired, and which may be produced by manufacturers other than the innovator company. Use of generic medicines has been increasing in recent years, primarily as a cost saving measure in healthcare provision. Generic medicines are typically 20 to 90% cheaper than originator equivalents. Our objective is to provide a high-level description of what generic medicines are and how they differ, at a regulatory and legislative level, from originator medicines. We describe the current and historical regulation of medicines in the world’s two main pharmaceutical markets, in addition to the similarities, as well as the differences, between generics and their originator equivalents including the reasons for the cost differences seen between originator and generic medicines. Ireland is currently poised to introduce generic substitution and reference pricing. This article refers to this situation as an exemplar of a national system on the cusp of significant health policy change, and specifically details Ireland’s history with usage of generic medicines and how the proposed changes could affect healthcare provision.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Comparing generic and innovator drugs: a review of 12 years of bioequivalence data from the United States Food and Drug Administration.

            In the US, manufacturers seeking approval to market a generic drug product must submit data demonstrating that the generic formulation provides the same rate and extent of absorption as (ie, is bioequivalent to) the innovator drug product. Thus, most orally administered generic drug products in the US are approved based on results of one or more clinical bioequivalence studies. To evaluate how well the bioequivalence measures of generic drugs approved in the US over a 12-year period compare with those of their corresponding innovator counterparts. This retrospective analysis compared the generic and innovator bioequivalence measures from 2070 single-dose clinical bioequivalence studies of orally administered generic drug products approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) from 1996 to 2007 (12 y). Bioequivalence measures evaluated were drug peak plasma concentration (C(max)) and area under the plasma drug concentration versus time curve (AUC), representing drug rate and extent of absorption, respectively. The generic/innovator C(max) and AUC geometric mean ratios (GMRs) were determined from each of the bioequivalence studies, which used from 12 to 170 subjects. The GMRs from the 2070 studies were averaged. In addition, the distribution of differences between generic means and innovator means was determined for both C(max) and AUC. The mean +/- SD of the GMRs from the 2070 studies was 1.00 +/- 0.06 for C(max) and 1.00 +/- 0.04 for AUC. The average difference in C(max) and AUC between generic and innovator products was 4.35% and 3.56%, respectively. In addition, in nearly 98% of the bioequivalence studies conducted during this period, the generic product AUC differed from that of the innovator product by less than 10%. The criteria used to evaluate generic drug bioequivalence studies support the FDA's objective of approving generic drug formulations that are therapeutically equivalent to their innovator counterparts.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Pyrolysis of waste materials using TGA-MS and TGA-FTIR as complementary characterisation techniques

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Pharm Bioallied Sci
                J Pharm Bioallied Sci
                JPBS
                Journal of Pharmacy & Bioallied Sciences
                Wolters Kluwer - Medknow (India )
                0976-4879
                0975-7406
                Oct-Dec 2020
                08 October 2020
                : 12
                : 4
                : 489-498
                Affiliations
                [1 ]College of Pharmacy, Al Ain University, Al Ain, Abu Dhabi, UAE
                [2 ]Faculty of Pharmacy, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
                [3 ]College of Medicine and Health Sciences, The United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, UAE
                [4 ]Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
                Author notes
                Address for correspondence: Associate Professor Dr Mosab Arafat, College of Pharmacy, Al Ain University, Al Ain, Abu Dhabi, UAE. E-mail: Mosab.arafat@ 123456aau.ac.ae
                Article
                JPBS-12-489
                10.4103/jpbs.JPBS_365_19
                7909057
                33679098
                75b03792-46a4-41aa-9815-b47eb3b58c6f
                Copyright: © 2020 Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences

                This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

                History
                : 20 December 2019
                : 15 May 2020
                : 08 June 2020
                Categories
                Original Article

                Pharmacology & Pharmaceutical medicine
                dissolution test,fourier transform infrared spectroscopy,furosemide,quality control test,thermal gravimetric analysis,thermal analysis

                Comments

                Comment on this article