4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Retrospective Evaluation of Ileocolic Artery and Vein Diameters according to Body Mass Index in the Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis on Multislice Computerized Tomography

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objectives:

          We aimed to investigate the diagnostic value of the increasement in the ileocolic artery and vein diameters considering the body mass index (BMIs) of the patients with acute appendicitis.

          Methods:

          Between January 2016 and April 2019, 76 patients who were diagnosed with acute appendicitis by contrast-enhanced abdominal multislice computerized tomography (MSCT) and had histopathologically confirmed appendicitis after an appendectomy were included in this study. To evaluate the value of MSCT, we created a control group, which consisted of 81 patients who had contrast-enhanced MSCT for other reasons and had no clinical and radiological findings suspicious for acute appendicitis and also had no other abdominal pathology that might interfere with ileocolic artery and vein diameter. In both groups, ileocolic artery and vein diameters were measured in axial MSCT scan. The body mass index was calculated for each patient (kg/m 2). Both groups were divided into three subgroups according to the BMI of patients (20-24.9; 25-29.9 and more than 30). Both groups and subgroups were compared individually. Statistical significance level was accepted as p <0.05.

          Results:

          Ileocolic artery and vein diameters were higher in the patient group than control group, which was statistically significant (p<0.001), and a positive correlation was found between BMI and ileocolic artery and vein diameters (p < 0.001).

          Conclusion:

          Ileocolic artery and vein diameters with taking BMI into consideration can be used as alternative criteria in the suspicion of acute appendicitis in adults.

          Related collections

          Most cited references16

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          A new adult appendicitis score improves diagnostic accuracy of acute appendicitis - a prospective study

          Background The aim of the study was to construct a new scoring system for more accurate diagnostics of acute appendicitis. Applying the new score into clinical practice could reduce the need of potentially harmful diagnostic imaging. Methods This prospective study enrolled 829 adults presenting with clinical suspicion of appendicitis, including 392 (47%) patients with appendicitis. The collected data included clinical findings and symptoms together with laboratory tests (white cell count, neutrophil count and C-reactive protein), and the timing of the onset of symptoms. The score was constructed by logistic regression analysis using multiple imputations for missing values. Performance of the constructed score in patients with complete data (n = 725) was compared with Alvarado score and Appendicitis inflammatory response score. Results 343 (47%) of patients with complete data had appendicitis. 199 (58%) patients with appendicitis had score value at least 16 and were classified as high probability group with 93% specificity.Patients with score below 11 were classified as low probability of appendicitis. Only 4% of patients with appendicitis had a score below 11, and none of them had complicated appendicitis. In contrast, 207 (54%) of non-appendicitis patients had score below 11. There were no cases with complicated appendicitis in the low probability group. The area under ROC curve was significantly larger with the new score 0.882 (95% CI 0.858 – 0.906) compared with AUC of Alvarado score 0.790 (0.758 – 0.823) and Appendicitis inflammatory response score 0.810 (0.779 – 0.840). Conclusions The new diagnostic score is fast and accurate in categorizing patients with suspected appendicitis, and roughly halves the need of diagnostic imaging.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Presidential Address: a history of appendicitis. With anecdotes illustrating its importance.

            Two hundred years after its anatomical description, the appendix was observed to be the site of inflammatory disease. This was not widely accepted until the publication by Fitz 120 years later. American surgeons led in demonstrating that early appendectomy was safe and life saving. Perforation of the appendix with peritonitis continues to be a significant problem, but the mortality rate has dramatically declined. Appendiceal disease has clearly affected the course of history.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Acute appendicitis: CT and US correlation in 100 patients.

              To compare the accuracy of computed tomography (CT) and ultrasonography (US) in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. One hundred consecutive patients were examined with US and CT, and the results, independently reported, were correlated with surgical and histopathologic findings (69 patients) and data from other laboratory and clinical follow-up (31 patients). Fifty-four patients had acute appendicitis; 46 patients did not. Analysis of the data for CT and US, respectively, revealed sensitivity, 96% versus 76%; specificity, 89% versus 91%; accuracy, 94% versus 83%; positive predictive value, 96% versus 95%; and negative predictive value, 95% versus 76%. In the 46 patients without appendicitis, an alternative diagnosis was made with CT in 22 patients and with US in 15. CT scans showed abscesses and/or phlegmons in 28% of patients with appendicitis versus 17% at US. Results of CT and US were discordant in 20 patients; CT findings were correct in 17 and US findings in three. CT is more accurate than US in diagnosis of acute appendicitis.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Sisli Etfal Hastan Tip Bul
                Sisli Etfal Hastan Tip Bul
                The Medical Bulletin of Sisli Etfal Hospital
                Kare Publishing (Turkey )
                1302-7123
                1308-5123
                2021
                17 March 2021
                : 55
                : 1
                : 18-22
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Radiology, Igdir State Hospital, Igdir, Turkey
                [2 ]Department of Radiology, University of Health Sciences Turkey, Sisli Hamidiye Etfal Teaching and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
                Author notes
                Address for correspondence: Burcin Agridag, MD. Saglik Bilimleri Universitesi, Sisli Hamidiye Etfal Tibbi Uygulama ve Arastirma Merkezi, Radyoloji Kliniği, İstanbul, Turkey Phone: +90 535 632 40 44 E-mail: drburcinagridag@ 123456gmail.com
                Article
                MBSEH-55-18
                10.14744/SEMB.2020.35033
                8085443
                75de6834-0bbf-4097-af52-46c0754e132f
                Copyright: © 2021 by The Medical Bulletin of Sisli Etfal Hospital

                This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).

                History
                : 11 March 2020
                : 22 May 2020
                Categories
                Original Research

                appendicitis,ileocolic artery,ileocolic vein,body mass index,multislice computerized tomography

                Comments

                Comment on this article