7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A Novel Hybrid Deep Learning Model for Metastatic Cancer Detection

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Cancer has been found as a heterogeneous disease with various subtypes and aims to destroy the body's normal cells abruptly. As a result, it is essential to detect and prognosis the distinct type of cancer since they may help cancer survivors with treatment in the early stage. It must also divide cancer patients into high- and low-risk groups. While realizing efficient detection of cancer is frequently a time-taking and exhausting task with the high possibility of pathologist errors and previous studies employed data mining and machine learning (ML) techniques to identify cancer, these strategies rely on handcrafted feature extraction techniques that result in incorrect classification. On the contrary, deep learning (DL) is robust in feature extraction and has recently been widely used for classification and detection purposes. This research implemented a novel hybrid AlexNet-gated recurrent unit (AlexNet-GRU) model for the lymph node (LN) breast cancer detection and classification. We have used a well-known Kaggle (PCam) data set to classify LN cancer samples. This study is tested and compared among three models: convolutional neural network GRU (CNN-GRU), CNN long short-term memory (CNN-LSTM), and the proposed AlexNet-GRU. The experimental results indicated that the performance metrics accuracy, precision, sensitivity, and specificity (99.50%, 98.10%, 98.90%, and 97.50) of the proposed model can reduce the pathologist errors that occur during the diagnosis process of incorrect classification and significantly better performance than CNN-GRU and CNN-LSTM models. The proposed model is compared with other recent ML/DL algorithms to analyze the model's efficiency, which reveals that the proposed AlexNet-GRU model is computationally efficient. Also, the proposed model presents its superiority over state-of-the-art methods for LN breast cancer detection and classification.

          Related collections

          Most cited references56

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Machine learning applications in cancer prognosis and prediction

          Cancer has been characterized as a heterogeneous disease consisting of many different subtypes. The early diagnosis and prognosis of a cancer type have become a necessity in cancer research, as it can facilitate the subsequent clinical management of patients. The importance of classifying cancer patients into high or low risk groups has led many research teams, from the biomedical and the bioinformatics field, to study the application of machine learning (ML) methods. Therefore, these techniques have been utilized as an aim to model the progression and treatment of cancerous conditions. In addition, the ability of ML tools to detect key features from complex datasets reveals their importance. A variety of these techniques, including Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs), Bayesian Networks (BNs), Support Vector Machines (SVMs) and Decision Trees (DTs) have been widely applied in cancer research for the development of predictive models, resulting in effective and accurate decision making. Even though it is evident that the use of ML methods can improve our understanding of cancer progression, an appropriate level of validation is needed in order for these methods to be considered in the everyday clinical practice. In this work, we present a review of recent ML approaches employed in the modeling of cancer progression. The predictive models discussed here are based on various supervised ML techniques as well as on different input features and data samples. Given the growing trend on the application of ML methods in cancer research, we present here the most recent publications that employ these techniques as an aim to model cancer risk or patient outcomes.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Prediction of cancer outcome with microarrays: a multiple random validation strategy

            General studies of microarray gene-expression profiling have been undertaken to predict cancer outcome. Knowledge of this gene-expression profile or molecular signature should improve treatment of patients by allowing treatment to be tailored to the severity of the disease. We reanalysed data from the seven largest published studies that have attempted to predict prognosis of cancer patients on the basis of DNA microarray analysis. The standard strategy is to identify a molecular signature (ie, the subset of genes most differentially expressed in patients with different outcomes) in a training set of patients and to estimate the proportion of misclassifications with this signature on an independent validation set of patients. We expanded this strategy (based on unique training and validation sets) by using multiple random sets, to study the stability of the molecular signature and the proportion of misclassifications. The list of genes identified as predictors of prognosis was highly unstable; molecular signatures strongly depended on the selection of patients in the training sets. For all but one study, the proportion misclassified decreased as the number of patients in the training set increased. Because of inadequate validation, our chosen studies published overoptimistic results compared with those from our own analyses. Five of the seven studies did not classify patients better than chance. The prognostic value of published microarray results in cancer studies should be considered with caution. We advocate the use of validation by repeated random sampling.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              A Dataset for Breast Cancer Histopathological Image Classification

              Today, medical image analysis papers require solid experiments to prove the usefulness of proposed methods. However, experiments are often performed on data selected by the researchers, which may come from different institutions, scanners, and populations. Different evaluation measures may be used, making it difficult to compare the methods. In this paper, we introduce a dataset of 7909 breast cancer histopathology images acquired on 82 patients, which is now publicly available from http://web.inf.ufpr.br/vri/breast-cancer-database. The dataset includes both benign and malignant images. The task associated with this dataset is the automated classification of these images in two classes, which would be a valuable computer-aided diagnosis tool for the clinician. In order to assess the difficulty of this task, we show some preliminary results obtained with state-of-the-art image classification systems. The accuracy ranges from 80% to 85%, showing room for improvement is left. By providing this dataset and a standardized evaluation protocol to the scientific community, we hope to gather researchers in both the medical and the machine learning field to advance toward this clinical application.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Comput Intell Neurosci
                Comput Intell Neurosci
                cin
                Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience
                Hindawi
                1687-5265
                1687-5273
                2022
                24 June 2022
                : 2022
                : 8141530
                Affiliations
                1School of Management Science and Engineering, Chongqing University of Post and Telecommunication, Chongqing 400065, China
                2Department of Electronics and Information Engineering, Xian Jiaotong University, Xian, China
                3Shenzhen College of Advanced Technology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen 518055, China
                4Dalian Medical College and University, Dalian 116044, China
                5Department of Zoology, Kohat University of Science and Technology, Kohat 26000, Pakistan
                6Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Science and Technology, Bannu 28100, Pakistan
                7Department of Information Technology, Faculty of Computing and Information Technology, King Abdulaziz University Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
                8College of Internet of Things (IoT) Engineering, Hohai University (HHU), Changzhou Campus, Nanjing 213022, China
                9Communication Research Laboratory, Department of Information and Communication Technology, Islamic University, Kushtia 7003, Bangladesh
                Author notes

                Academic Editor: Shibli Nisar

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3974-2207
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8917-9278
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5879-569X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6253-5519
                Article
                10.1155/2022/8141530
                9249449
                761a40ca-28a6-480e-a94e-5bfe58e64cdf
                Copyright © 2022 Shahab Ahmad et al.

                This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 20 February 2022
                : 28 April 2022
                : 1 June 2022
                Categories
                Research Article

                Neurosciences
                Neurosciences

                Comments

                Comment on this article