36
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      IL-33 contributes to sepsis-induced long-term immunosuppression by expanding the regulatory T cell population

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Patients who survive sepsis can develop long-term immune dysfunction, with expansion of the regulatory T (Treg) cell population. However, how Treg cells proliferate in these patients is not clear. Here we show that IL-33 has a major function in the induction of this immunosuppression. Mice deficient in ST2 (IL-33R) develop attenuated immunosuppression in cases that survive sepsis, whereas treatment of naive wild-type mice with IL-33 induces immunosuppression. IL-33, released during tissue injury in sepsis, activates type 2 innate lymphoid cells, which promote polarization of M2 macrophages, thereby enhancing expansion of the Treg cell population via IL-10. Moreover, sepsis-surviving patients have more Treg cells, IL-33 and IL-10 in their peripheral blood. Our study suggests that targeting IL-33 may be an effective treatment for sepsis-induced immunosuppression.

          Abstract

          Patients who survive sepsis are at increased risk of infection owing to long-term immunosuppression that is associated with an increase in Treg cell numbers. Here the authors show expansion of the Treg cell population in sepsis mice is driven by IL-33-induced ILC2 activation of IL-10 production by macrophages.

          Related collections

          Most cited references38

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Local macrophage proliferation, rather than recruitment from the blood, is a signature of TH2 inflammation.

          A defining feature of inflammation is the accumulation of innate immune cells in the tissue that are thought to be recruited from the blood. We reveal that a distinct process exists in which tissue macrophages undergo rapid in situ proliferation in order to increase population density. This inflammatory mechanism occurred during T helper 2 (T(H)2)-related pathologies under the control of the archetypal T(H)2 cytokine interleukin-4 (IL-4) and was a fundamental component of T(H)2 inflammation because exogenous IL-4 was sufficient to drive accumulation of tissue macrophages through self-renewal. Thus, expansion of innate cells necessary for pathogen control or wound repair can occur without recruitment of potentially tissue-destructive inflammatory cells.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Macrophage polarization in bacterial infections.

            Converging studies have shown that M1 and M2 macrophages are functionally polarized in response to microorganisms and host mediators. Gene expression profiling of macrophages reveals that various Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria induce the transcriptional activity of a "common host response," which includes genes belonging to the M1 program. However, excessive or prolonged M1 polarization can lead to tissue injury and contribute to pathogenesis. The so-called M2 macrophages play a critical role in the resolution of inflammation by producing anti-inflammatory mediators. These M2 cells cover a continuum of cells with different phenotypic and functional properties. In addition, some bacterial pathogens induce specific M2 programs in macrophages. In this review, we discuss the relevance of macrophage polarization in three domains of infectious diseases: resistance to infection, infectious pathogenesis, and chronic evolution of infectious diseases.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Two physically, functionally, and developmentally distinct peritoneal macrophage subsets.

              The peritoneal cavity (PerC) is a unique compartment within which a variety of immune cells reside, and from which macrophages (MØ) are commonly drawn for functional studies. Here we define two MØ subsets that coexist in PerC in adult mice. One, provisionally called the large peritoneal MØ (LPM), contains approximately 90% of the PerC MØ in unstimulated animals but disappears rapidly from PerC following lipopolysaccharide (LPS) or thioglycolate stimulation. These cells express high levels of the canonical MØ surface markers, CD11b and F4/80. The second subset, referred to as small peritoneal MØ (SPM), expresses substantially lower levels of CD11b and F4/80 but expresses high levels of MHC-II, which is not expressed on LPM. SPM, which predominates in PerC after LPS or thioglycolate stimulation, does not derive from LPM. Instead, it derives from blood monocytes that rapidly enter the PerC after stimulation and differentiate to mature SPM within 2 to 4 d. Both subsets show clear phagocytic activity and both produce nitric oxide (NO) in response to LPS stimulation in vivo. However, their responses to LPS show key differences: in vitro, LPS stimulates LPM, but not SPM, to produce NO; in vivo, LPS stimulates both subsets to produce NO, albeit with different response patterns. These findings extend current models of MØ heterogeneity and shed new light on PerC MØ diversity, development, and function. Thus, they introduce a new context for interpreting (and reinterpreting) data from ex vivo studies with PerC MØ.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Nat Commun
                Nat Commun
                Nature Communications
                Nature Publishing Group
                2041-1723
                04 April 2017
                2017
                : 8
                : 14919
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Departments of Pharmacology, Ribeirao Preto Medical School, University of Sao Paulo , Ribeirao Preto 14049-900, Brazil
                [2 ]Department of Internal Medicine, Ribeirao Preto Medical School, University of Sao Paulo , Ribeirao Preto 14049-900, Brazil
                [3 ]Department of Immunology, Institute of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, University of Glasgow , Glasgow G12 8TA, UK
                [4 ]Departments of Cell Biology and Microbial Pathogenesis, Ribeirao Preto Medical School, University of Sao Paulo , Ribeirao Preto 14049-900, Brazil
                [5 ]School of Biology and Basic Medical Sciences, Soochow University , Suzhou 215006, China
                Author notes
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7856-7512
                Article
                ncomms14919
                10.1038/ncomms14919
                5382289
                28374774
                7650a5f4-04c0-4ff6-9f61-23e0b2967950
                Copyright © 2017, The Author(s)

                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

                History
                : 03 April 2016
                : 09 February 2017
                Categories
                Article

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article