2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Effective factors of improved helmet use in motorcyclists: a systematic review

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Road traffic injuries (RTI) are one of the most prominent causes of morbidity and mortality, especially among children and young adults. Motorcycle crashes constitute a significant part of RTIs. Policymakers believe that safety helmets are the single most important protection against motorcycle-related injuries. However, motorcyclists are not wearing helmets at desirable rates. This study systematically investigated factors that are positively associated with helmet usage among two-wheeled motorcycle riders.

          Methods

          We performed a systematic search on PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane library with relevant keywords. No language, date of publication, or methodological restrictions were applied. All the articles that had evaluated the factors associated with helmet-wearing behavior and were published before December 31, 2021, were included in our study and underwent data extraction. We assessed the quality of the included articles using the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) checklist for observational studies.

          Results

          A total of 50 articles were included. Most evidence suggests that helmet usage is more common among drivers (compared to passengers), women, middle-aged adults, those with higher educations, married individuals, license holders, and helmet owners. Moreover, the helmet usage rate is higher on highways and central city roads and during mornings and weekdays. Travelers of longer distances, more frequent users, and riders of motorcycles with larger engines use safety helmets more commonly. Non-helmet-using drivers seem to have acceptable awareness of mandatory helmet laws and knowledge about their protective role against head injuries. Importantly, complaint about helmet discomfort is somehow common among helmet-using drivers.

          Conclusions

          To enhance helmet usage, policymakers should emphasize the vulnerability of passengers and children to RTIs, and that fatal crashes occur on low-capacity roads and during cruising at low speeds. Monitoring by police should expand to late hours of the day, weekends, and lower capacity and less-trafficked roads. Aiming to enhance the acceptance of other law-abiding behaviors (e.g., wearing seat belts, riding within the speed limits, etc.), especially among youth and young adults, will enhance the prevalence of helmet-wearing behavior among motorcycle riders. Interventions should put their focus on improving the attitudes of riders regarding safety helmets, as there is acceptable knowledge of their benefits.

          Supplementary Information

          The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-022-14893-0.

          Related collections

          Most cited references63

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews

          The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement, published in 2009, was designed to help systematic reviewers transparently report why the review was done, what the authors did, and what they found. Over the past decade, advances in systematic review methodology and terminology have necessitated an update to the guideline. The PRISMA 2020 statement replaces the 2009 statement and includes new reporting guidance that reflects advances in methods to identify, select, appraise, and synthesise studies. The structure and presentation of the items have been modified to facilitate implementation. In this article, we present the PRISMA 2020 27-item checklist, an expanded checklist that details reporting recommendations for each item, the PRISMA 2020 abstract checklist, and the revised flow diagrams for original and updated reviews.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies.

            Much of biomedical research is observational. The reporting of such research is often inadequate, which hampers the assessment of its strengths and weaknesses and of a study's generalizability. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Initiative developed recommendations on what should be included in an accurate and complete report of an observational study. We defined the scope of the recommendations to cover three main study designs: cohort, case-control, and cross-sectional studies. We convened a 2-day workshop in September 2004, with methodologists, researchers, and journal editors to draft a checklist of items. This list was subsequently revised during several meetings of the coordinating group and in e-mail discussions with the larger group of STROBE contributors, taking into account empirical evidence and methodological considerations. The workshop and the subsequent iterative process of consultation and revision resulted in a checklist of 22 items (the STROBE Statement) that relate to the title, abstract, introduction, methods, results, and discussion sections of articles. Eighteen items are common to all three study designs and four are specific for cohort, case-control, or cross-sectional studies. A detailed Explanation and Elaboration document is published separately and is freely available on the web sites of PLoS Medicine, Annals of Internal Medicine, and Epidemiology. We hope that the STROBE Statement will contribute to improving the quality of reporting of observational studies.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Clinical and laboratory features that distinguish dengue from other febrile illnesses in endemic populations.

              Clinicians in resource-poor countries need to identify patients with dengue using readily-available data. The objective of this systematic review was to identify clinical and laboratory features that differentiate dengue fever (DF) and/or dengue haemorrhagic fever (DHF) from other febrile illnesses (OFI) in dengue-endemic populations. Systematic review of the literature from 1990 to 30 October 2007 including English publications comparing dengue and OFI. Among 49 studies reviewed, 34 did not meet our criteria for inclusion. Of the 15 studies included, 10 were prospective cohort studies and five were case-control studies. Seven studies assessed all ages, four assessed children only, and four assessed adults only. Patients with dengue had significantly lower platelet, white blood cell (WBC) and neutrophil counts, and a higher frequency of petechiae than OFI patients. Higher frequencies of myalgia, rash, haemorrhagic signs, lethargy/prostration, and arthralgia/joint pain and higher haematocrits were reported in adult patients with dengue but not in children. Most multivariable models included platelet count, WBC, rash, and signs of liver damage; however, none had high statistical validity and none considered changes in clinical features over the course of illness. Several individual clinical and laboratory variables distinguish dengue from OFI; however, some variables may be dependent on age. No published multivariable model has been validated. Study design, populations, diagnostic criteria, and data collection methods differed widely across studies, and the majority of studies did not identify specific aetiologies of OFIs. More prospective studies are needed to construct a valid and generalizable algorithm to guide the differential diagnosis of dengue in endemic countries.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                pouyamahdavish@gmail.com
                v_rahimi@sina.tums.ac.ir
                Journal
                BMC Public Health
                BMC Public Health
                BMC Public Health
                BioMed Central (London )
                1471-2458
                5 January 2023
                5 January 2023
                2023
                : 23
                : 26
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.411705.6, ISNI 0000 0001 0166 0922, Sina Trauma and Surgery Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, ; Tehran, Iran
                [2 ]GRID grid.411705.6, ISNI 0000 0001 0166 0922, School of Medicine, , Tehran University of Medical Sciences, ; Tehran, Iran
                [3 ]GRID grid.411705.6, ISNI 0000 0001 0166 0922, Brain and Spinal Cord Injury Research Center, , Neuroscience Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, ; Tehran, Iran
                [4 ]GRID grid.486769.2, ISNI 0000 0004 0384 8779, Faculty of Medicine, , Semnan University of Medical Sciences, ; Semnan, Iran
                [5 ]GRID grid.411135.3, ISNI 0000 0004 0415 3047, Noncommunicable Diseases Research Center, Fasa University of Medical Sciences, ; Fasa, Iran
                [6 ]GRID grid.411368.9, ISNI 0000 0004 0611 6995, The Department of Biomedical Engineering, , Amirkabir University of Technology (Tehran Polytechnic), ; Tehran, Iran
                [7 ]GRID grid.412571.4, ISNI 0000 0000 8819 4698, Health Policy Research Center, , Institute of Health, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, ; Shiraz, Iran
                [8 ]GRID grid.411705.6, ISNI 0000 0001 0166 0922, Endocrinology and Metabolism Research Center, Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinical Sciences Institute, , Tehran University of Medical Sciences, ; Tehran, Iran
                [9 ]GRID grid.488433.0, ISNI 0000 0004 0612 8339, Health Promotion Research Center, , Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, ; Zahedan, Iran
                [10 ]GRID grid.1002.3, ISNI 0000 0004 1936 7857, Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, , Monash University, ; Melbourne, Australia
                [11 ]GRID grid.510410.1, ISNI 0000 0004 8010 4431, Universal Scientific Education and Research Network (USERN), ; Tehran, Iran
                [12 ]GRID grid.46072.37, ISNI 0000 0004 0612 7950, Institute of Biochemistry and Biophysics, , University of Tehran, ; Tehran, Iran
                [13 ]GRID grid.17063.33, ISNI 0000 0001 2157 2938, Visiting Professor, Spine Program, , University of Toronto, ; Toronto, Canada
                Article
                14893
                10.1186/s12889-022-14893-0
                9814199
                36604638
                76954ee5-9b75-4a6e-beb4-8ca80e3cacde
                © The Author(s) 2023

                Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

                History
                : 6 July 2022
                : 19 December 2022
                Categories
                Research
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2023

                Public health
                helmet,head protective devices,motorcycles,wounds and injuries,accidents,traffic,systematic review

                Comments

                Comment on this article