For Publishers
DiscoveryMetadataPeer reviewHostingPublishing
For Researchers
JoinPublishReviewCollect
Register
Blog
About
Search
Advanced search
My ScienceOpen
Search
For Publishers
For Researchers
Blog
About
17
views
47
references
 Top references
cited by
24
    
0 reviews
 Review
0
comments
 Comment
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      1,227
      similar
       All similar
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Reconsideration of the scheme of the international classification of functioning, disability and health: incentives from the Netherlands for a global debate

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The ICF (International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health) framework (used worldwide to describe 'functioning' and 'disability'), including the ICF scheme (visualization of functioning as result of interaction with health condition and contextual factors), needs reconsideration. The purpose of this article is to discuss alternative ICF schemes.

          Related collections

          Most cited references47

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The disablement process

          Lois Verbrugge, Alan Jette (1994)
          Article 0 comments Cited 431 times – based on 0 reviews     Review now
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            City planning and population health: a global challenge

            Billie Giles-Corti, Anne Vernez-Moudon, Rodrigo Reis … (2016)
            Article 0 comments Cited 324 times – based on 0 reviews     Review now
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              ICF linking rules: an update based on lessons learned.

              Alarcos Cieza, Szilvia Geyh, Somnath Chatterji … (2005)
              Outcome research seeks to understand the end results of health services. Researchers use a wide variety of outcome measures including technical, clinical and patient-oriented measures. The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) as a common reference framework for functioning may contribute to improved outcome research. The objective of this paper is to provide an updated version of the linking rules published in 2002 and illustrate how these rules are applied to link technical and clinical measures, health-status measures and interventions to the ICF. Three specific linking rules have been established to link health-status measures to the ICF and one specific linking rule has been created to link technical and clinical measures and interventions. A total of 8 linking rules have been established for use with all different outcome measures and with interventions. The newly updated linking rules will allow researchers systematically to link and compare meaningful concepts contained in them. This should prove extremely useful in selecting the most appropriate outcome measures among a number of candidate measures for the applied interventions. Further possible applications are the operationalization of concrete ICF categories using specific measures or the creation of ICF category-based item bankings.
              Article 0 comments Cited 241 times – based on 0 reviews     Review now
                Bookmark
                All references

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Title: Disability and Rehabilitation
                Abbreviated Title: Disability and Rehabilitation
                Publisher: Informa UK Limited
                ISSN (Print): 0963-8288
                ISSN (Electronic): 1464-5165
                Publication date Created: March 03 2017
                Publication date Created: February 27 2018
                Publication date (Electronic): January 27 2017
                Publication date (Print): February 27 2018
                Volume: 40
                Issue: 5
                Pages: 603-611
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Dutch Institute of Allied Health Care, Amersfoort, The Netherlands;
                [2 ] Research Group Occupation & Health, HAN University of Applied Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands;
                [3 ] Earth, Life and Social Sciences, TNO, Leiden, The Netherlands;
                [4 ] Institute for Positive Health, Amersfoort, The Netherlands;
                [5 ] Department of Epidemiology, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands;
                [6 ] Innovation Health Care Professions & Education, Dutch Health Care Institute, Diemen, The Netherlands;
                [7 ] WHO Collaborating Centre for the Family of International Classifications in The Netherlands, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands;
                [8 ] The Trimbos Institute, Netherlands Institute of Mental Health and Addiction, Utrecht, The Netherlands;
                [9 ] School of Nursing & Health, University Medical Center, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands;
                [10 ] Topsector Life Sciences and Health (Health ∼ Holland), The Hague, The Netherlands;
                [11 ] CAPHRI, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
                Article
                DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2016.1277404
                PubMed ID: 28129712
                SO-VID: 778dea03-bb5c-4b3a-ac93-d8b13c1ee54f
                Copyright © © 2018
                History

                Data availability:

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_

                Similar content1,227

                See all similar

                Cited by23

                See all cited by

                Most referenced authors665

                See all reference authors