13
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A retrospective study on perineal lacerations in vaginal delivery and the individual performance of experienced mifwives

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Medical staff’s influence on patient outcomes has become a subject of interest. We evaluated experienced midwives and compared their performance concerning perineal lacerations (PL).

          Methods

          In a retrospective cohort study, 1937 women with singleton pregnancies who had delivered spontaneously with a cephalic presentation by experienced midwives in the Medical University of Vienna from January 2009 to April 2014 were included. As predictive parameters, we included basic patient-, pregnancy- and delivery-related characteristics including the individual midwife who delivered the child. The incidence of PL was the main outcome measure.

          Results

          Overall PL and severe PL were found in 508/1937 (26.2 %) and 19/1937 women (1.0 %), respectively. In a multivariate analysis for PL of any degree, maternal age (ß = 0.170 ± 0.080), gestational age at delivery (ß = 0.190 ± 0.320), and birth weight (ß = 0.002 ± 0.000) significantly increased the risk, whereas multiparity (ß = −0.379 ± 0.141) and mediolateral episiotomy (ß = −1.514 ± 0.284) decreased it ( p < 0.05). In addition, the individual midwife who delivered the child was a significant influencing factor, with ß-values ranging from −0.028 to 0.899 compared to the reference midwife. For severe PL, the midwife was not of significant influence.

          Conclusions

          The individual midwife is an independent factor that influences the risk for overall PL, not for severe PL. Other risk factors include maternal age, gestational age at delivery, birth weight, parity and episiotomy.

          Related collections

          Most cited references21

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Occult anal sphincter injuries--myth or reality?

          To establish the true prevalence of clinically recognisable and occult obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS). Prospective interventional study. Busy district general hospital. Two hundred and fifty-four women having their first vaginal delivery over a 12-month period were invited. Two hundred and forty-one (95%) participated and 208 (86%) attended follow up. Women had a clinical examination at delivery by the accoucheur and repeated by an experienced research fellow immediately after delivery. All identified OASIS were verified and repaired by the duty specialist registrar or consultant. Endoanal ultrasound was performed immediately postpartum prior to suturing and repeated seven weeks later. Prevalence of recognised and occult anal sphincter injuries. Fifty-nine (24.5%) women sustained OASIS. The prevalence of OASIS increased significantly from 11% to 24.5% when women were re-examined. Of these, 30 occurred in deliveries by midwives who missed 26 (87%) and 29 following deliveries by doctors who missed 8 (28%) injuries. All clinically apparent OASIS were also identified on endoanal ultrasound. In addition, three (1.2%) women had an occult anal sphincter injury. Two of these occult sphincter injuries were isolated to the internal anal sphincter (IAS) and would not usually be clinically detectable. OASIS occur more frequently than previously reported. Many remain undiagnosed and are subsequently classified as occult when identified on anal endosonography. Genuine occult injuries are rare. Training in perineal anatomy and recognition of OASIS needs to be enhanced in order to increase detection of OASIS and minimise the risk of consequent anal incontinence.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Incidence of and risk factors for perineal trauma: a prospective observational study

            Background Our aim was to describe the range of perineal trauma in women with a singleton vaginal birth and estimate the effect of maternal and obstetric characteristics on the incidence of perineal tears. Methods We conducted a prospective observational study on all women with a planned singleton vaginal delivery between May and September 2006 in one obstetric unit, three freestanding midwifery-led units and home settings in South East England. Data on maternal and obstetric characteristics were collected prospectively and analysed using univariable and multivariable logistic regression. The outcome measures were incidence of perineal trauma, type of perineal trauma and whether it was sutured or not. Results The proportion of women with an intact perineum at delivery was 9.6% (125/1,302) in nulliparae, and 31.2% (453/1,452) in multiparae, with a higher incidence in the community (freestanding midwifery-led units and home settings). Multivariable analysis showed multiparity (OR 0.52; 95% CI: 0.30–0.90) was associated with reduced odds of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS), whilst forceps (OR 4.43; 95% CI: 2.02–9.71), longer duration of second stage of labour (OR 1.49; 95% CI: 1.13–1.98), and heavier birthweight (OR 1.001; 95% CI: 1.001–1.001), were associated with increased odds. Adjusted ORs for spontaneous perineal truama were: multiparity (OR 0.42; 95% CI: 0.32–0.56); hospital delivery (OR 1.48; 95% CI: 1.01–2.17); forceps delivery (OR 2.61; 95% CI: 1.22–5.56); longer duration of second stage labour (OR 1.45; 95% CI: 1.28–1.63); and heavier birthweight (OR 1.001; 95% CI: 1.000–1.001). Conclusions This large prospective study found no evidence for an association between many factors related to midwifery practice such as use of a birthing pool, digital perineal stretching in the second stage, hands off delivery technique, or maternal birth position with incidence of OASIS or spontaneous perineal trauma. We also found a low overall incidence of OASIS, and fewer second degree tears were sutured in the community than in the hospital settings. This study confirms previous findings of overall high incidence of perineal trauma following vaginal delivery, and a strong association between forceps delivery and perineal trauma.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              A multicenter interventional program to reduce the incidence of anal sphincter tears.

              In Norway, we have experienced a gradual increase in the incidence of obstetric anal sphincter injuries from under 1% in the late 1960s to 4.3% in 2004. This study was aimed to assess whether an interventional program causes a decrease in the frequency of anal sphincter tears. In all, 40,152 vaginal deliveries between 2003 and 2009 were enrolled in the interventional cohort study from four Norwegian obstetric departments. The focus of the intervention was on manual assistance during the final part of the second stage of labor. Data were analyzed in relation to occurrence of obstetric anal sphincter tears. The proportion of parturients with anal sphincter tears decreased from 4-5% to 1-2% during the study period in all four hospitals (P<.001). The tears associated with both noninstrumental and instrumental deliveries decreased dramatically. The number of patients with grades 3 and 4 anal sphincter ruptures decreased significantly, and the reduction was most pronounced in grade 4 tears (-63.5%) and least in 3c tears (-47.5%) (both P<.001). The number of episiotomies increased in two hospitals but remained unchanged in the other two. The lowest proportion of tears at the end of the intervention (1.2% and 1.3%, respectively) was found in the two hospitals with an unchanged episiotomy rate. The multicenter intervention caused a highly significant decrease in obstetric anal sphincter injuries. II.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                johannes.ott@meduniwien.ac.at
                evelyn.gritsch@fh-campuswien.ac.at
                sophie.pils@meduniwien.ac.at
                sophie.kratschmar@gmail.com
                +431/40400/28160 , regina.promberger@meduniwien.ac.at
                rudolf.seemann@meduniwien.ac.at
                sab.fuerst@gmail.com
                dagmar.bancher-todesca@meduniwien.ac.at
                christa.hauser-auzinger@akhwien.at
                Journal
                BMC Pregnancy Childbirth
                BMC Pregnancy Childbirth
                BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
                BioMed Central (London )
                1471-2393
                22 October 2015
                22 October 2015
                2015
                : 15
                : 270
                Affiliations
                [ ]Department of Obstetrics and Fetomaternal Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria
                [ ]Midwifery Services, General Hospital of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria
                [ ]Department of Gynecology, St. John of God Hospital Vienna, Johannes von Gott Platz 1, 1020 Vienna, Austria
                [ ]Department of for Cranio- and Maxillofacial Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria
                Article
                703
                10.1186/s12884-015-0703-0
                4619016
                26493021
                77c1a931-f976-4739-b175-06dc5b7c6e9e
                © Ott et al. 2015

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 27 August 2015
                : 8 October 2015
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2015

                Obstetrics & Gynecology
                vaginal delivery,perineal trauma,complication,quality management,midwife
                Obstetrics & Gynecology
                vaginal delivery, perineal trauma, complication, quality management, midwife

                Comments

                Comment on this article