ScienceOpen: research and publishing network

For Researchers

Search
Advanced search

1

views

    

0

recommends

0

shares

Record: found
Abstract: found
Article: not found

Checklists of methodological issues for review authors to consider when including non-randomized studies in systematic reviews.

Author(s): George A Wells, Beverley Shea, Julian PT Higgins, Jonathan Sterne, Peter Tugwell, Barnaby Reeves

Publication date: 2013-03-01

Journal: Research Synthesis Methods

Keywords: non-randomized studies, methodological issues, checklists, systematic review

Read this article at

ScienceOpenPublisher PubMed

There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

Abstract

There is increasing interest from review authors about including non-randomized studies (NRS) in their systematic reviews of health care interventions. This series from the Ottawa Non-Randomized Studies Workshop consists of six papers identifying methodological issues when doing this.

Related collections

Author and article information

Journal

PubMed ID:: 26053540

DOI:: 10.1002/jrsm.1077

Keywords: non-randomized studies,methodological issues,checklists,systematic review

Data availability:

Keywords: non-randomized studies, methodological issues, checklists, systematic review

Comments

Comment on this article

scite_