0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A scoping review of psychological distress instruments in women with early‐stage breast cancer during chemotherapy

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Psychological distress is associated with worsening symptoms during the active treatment period and lower quality of life in women with early‐stage breast cancer. Many studies have indicated risk for heightened psychological distress across the breast cancer trajectory.

          Purpose

          The aim of this review is to examine the literature for instruments used to measure psychological distress among women with breast cancer during chemotherapy.

          Methods

          This study used the Arksey and O’Malley framework of scoping reviews. Two databases, PubMed & CINAHL, were searched for peer‐reviewed original articles that were published within the last ten years, included participants with a diagnosis of breast cancer stages I to III, and receiving chemotherapy, English text articles, and studies that report psychological distress measures.

          Findings

          The initial screening yielded 529 relevant studies. After applying the exclusion criteria, a total of 17 studies concerning the assessment of psychological distress during chemotherapy were retained for the analysis of variables and measures of psychological distress. The instruments used to measure psychological distress varied, with a total of 21 measures. The most frequently utilized measure was the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale ( n = 5), followed by the Impact of Event Scale ( n = 2), the Distress Thermometer ( n = 2), and the Perceived Stress Scale ( n = 2).

          Conclusion

          This review identified the gaps related to inconsistencies in the operationalization and instruments used to measure psychological distress among breast cancer survivors during chemotherapy. Standardization of measures assessing psychological distress, along with conceptual clarity, is essential for measuring distress in research and clinical practice.

          Related collections

          Most cited references44

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation

          Scoping reviews, a type of knowledge synthesis, follow a systematic approach to map evidence on a topic and identify main concepts, theories, sources, and knowledge gaps. Although more scoping reviews are being done, their methodological and reporting quality need improvement. This document presents the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) checklist and explanation. The checklist was developed by a 24-member expert panel and 2 research leads following published guidance from the EQUATOR (Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research) Network. The final checklist contains 20 essential reporting items and 2 optional items. The authors provide a rationale and an example of good reporting for each item. The intent of the PRISMA-ScR is to help readers (including researchers, publishers, commissioners, policymakers, health care providers, guideline developers, and patients or consumers) develop a greater understanding of relevant terminology, core concepts, and key items to report for scoping reviews.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found
              Is Open Access

              Cancer statistics, 2022

              Each year, the American Cancer Society estimates the numbers of new cancer cases and deaths in the United States and compiles the most recent data on population-based cancer occurrence and outcomes. Incidence data (through 2018) were collected by the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program; the National Program of Cancer Registries; and the North American Association of Central Cancer Registries. Mortality data (through 2019) were collected by the National Center for Health Statistics. In 2022, 1,918,030 new cancer cases and 609,360 cancer deaths are projected to occur in the United States, including approximately 350 deaths per day from lung cancer, the leading cause of cancer death. Incidence during 2014 through 2018 continued a slow increase for female breast cancer (by 0.5% annually) and remained stable for prostate cancer, despite a 4% to 6% annual increase for advanced disease since 2011. Consequently, the proportion of prostate cancer diagnosed at a distant stage increased from 3.9% to 8.2% over the past decade. In contrast, lung cancer incidence continued to decline steeply for advanced disease while rates for localized-stage increased suddenly by 4.5% annually, contributing to gains both in the proportion of localized-stage diagnoses (from 17% in 2004 to 28% in 2018) and 3-year relative survival (from 21% to 31%). Mortality patterns reflect incidence trends, with declines accelerating for lung cancer, slowing for breast cancer, and stabilizing for prostate cancer. In summary, progress has stagnated for breast and prostate cancers but strengthened for lung cancer, coinciding with changes in medical practice related to cancer screening and/or treatment. More targeted cancer control interventions and investment in improved early detection and treatment would facilitate reductions in cancer mortality.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                aniziamal@ksau-hs.edu.sa
                Journal
                Cancer Rep (Hoboken)
                Cancer Rep (Hoboken)
                10.1002/(ISSN)2573-8348
                CNR2
                Cancer Reports
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                2573-8348
                12 May 2023
                June 2023
                : 6
                : 6 ( doiID: 10.1002/cnr2.v6.6 )
                : e1833
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] College of Nursing King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences Riyadh Saudi Arabia
                [ 2 ] Department of Biobehavioral Nursing Science College of Nursing, University of Florida Gainesville Florida USA
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Amal Khulaif Alanazi, College of Nursing, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh 11481, Saudi Arabia.

                Email: aniziamal@ 123456ksau-hs.edu.sa

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4348-2487
                Article
                CNR21833
                10.1002/cnr2.1833
                10242653
                37170774
                783796ce-a455-4d4a-9921-d74f0e102e76
                © 2023 The Authors. Cancer Reports published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 02 April 2023
                : 24 October 2022
                : 29 April 2023
                Page count
                Figures: 2, Tables: 2, Pages: 13, Words: 8529
                Categories
                Review
                Reviews
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                June 2023
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.2.8 mode:remove_FC converted:06.06.2023

                breast cancer,chemotherapy,oncology,psychological distress,scoping review,stress

                Comments

                Comment on this article