64
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Global Conservation Significance of Ecuador's Yasuní National Park

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          The threats facing Ecuador's Yasuní National Park are emblematic of those confronting the greater western Amazon, one of the world's last high-biodiversity wilderness areas. Notably, the country's second largest untapped oil reserves—called “ITT”—lie beneath an intact, remote section of the park. The conservation significance of Yasuní may weigh heavily in upcoming state-level and international decisions, including whether to develop the oil or invest in alternatives.

          Methodology/Principal Findings

          We conducted the first comprehensive synthesis of biodiversity data for Yasuní. Mapping amphibian, bird, mammal, and plant distributions, we found eastern Ecuador and northern Peru to be the only regions in South America where species richness centers for all four taxonomic groups overlap. This quadruple richness center has only one viable strict protected area (IUCN levels I–IV): Yasuní. The park covers just 14% of the quadruple richness center's area, whereas active or proposed oil concessions cover 79%. Using field inventory data, we compared Yasuní's local (alpha) and landscape (gamma) diversity to other sites, in the western Amazon and globally. These analyses further suggest that Yasuní is among the most biodiverse places on Earth, with apparent world richness records for amphibians, reptiles, bats, and trees. Yasuní also protects a considerable number of threatened species and regional endemics.

          Conclusions/Significance

          Yasuní has outstanding global conservation significance due to its extraordinary biodiversity and potential to sustain this biodiversity in the long term because of its 1) large size and wilderness character, 2) intact large-vertebrate assemblage, 3) IUCN level-II protection status in a region lacking other strict protected areas, and 4) likelihood of maintaining wet, rainforest conditions while anticipated climate change-induced drought intensifies in the eastern Amazon. However, further oil development in Yasuní jeopardizes its conservation values. These findings form the scientific basis for policy recommendations, including stopping any new oil activities and road construction in Yasuní and creating areas off-limits to large-scale development in adjacent northern Peru.

          Related collections

          Most cited references17

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Speciation in amazonian forest birds.

          J Haffer (1969)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Climate change, deforestation, and the fate of the Amazon.

            The forest biome of Amazonia is one of Earth's greatest biological treasures and a major component of the Earth system. This century, it faces the dual threats of deforestation and stress from climate change. Here, we summarize some of the latest findings and thinking on these threats, explore the consequences for the forest ecosystem and its human residents, and outline options for the future of Amazonia. We also discuss the implications of new proposals to finance preservation of Amazonian forests.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The status of the world's land and marine mammals: diversity, threat, and knowledge.

              Knowledge of mammalian diversity is still surprisingly disparate, both regionally and taxonomically. Here, we present a comprehensive assessment of the conservation status and distribution of the world's mammals. Data, compiled by 1700+ experts, cover all 5487 species, including marine mammals. Global macroecological patterns are very different for land and marine species but suggest common mechanisms driving diversity and endemism across systems. Compared with land species, threat levels are higher among marine mammals, driven by different processes (accidental mortality and pollution, rather than habitat loss), and are spatially distinct (peaking in northern oceans, rather than in Southeast Asia). Marine mammals are also disproportionately poorly known. These data are made freely available to support further scientific developments and conservation action.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, USA )
                1932-6203
                2010
                19 January 2010
                : 5
                : 1
                : e8767
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Finding Species, Takoma Park, Maryland, United States of America
                [2 ]Save America's Forests, Washington D. C., United States of America
                [3 ]Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America
                [4 ]Department of Biology, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, United States of America
                [5 ]Division of Biological Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States of America
                [6 ]Department of Geography, King's College London, Strand, London, United Kingdom
                [7 ]College of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Universidad San Francisco de Quito, Quito, Ecuador
                [8 ]Department of Biology, Texas State University, San Marcos, Texas, United States of America
                [9 ]TADPOLE Organization, San Marcos, Texas, United States of America
                [10 ]School of Biological Sciences, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, United States of America
                [11 ]Department of Anthropology, New York University, New York, New York, United States of America
                [12 ]Leibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research, Berlin, Germany
                [13 ]Center for Ecology and Conservation Biology, Department of Biology, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
                University of Zurich, Switzerland
                Author notes

                Conceived and designed the experiments: MB MSF. Performed the experiments: MB MSF CNJ HK DFCH SFM NCP PE KS GV ADF CV TK. Analyzed the data: MB MSF CNJ HK DFCH SFM NCP PE KS GV ADF CV TK. Wrote the paper: MB MSF CNJ HK DFCH SFM NCP PE KS GV ADF CV TK. Designed and created figures: CNJ HK.

                Article
                09-PONE-RA-09637R1
                10.1371/journal.pone.0008767
                2808245
                20098736
                7a0bafe8-d7ba-4ee4-aaa7-9b97b687b298
                Bass et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
                History
                : 1 April 2009
                : 17 November 2009
                Page count
                Pages: 22
                Categories
                Research Article
                Ecology
                Ecology/Community Ecology and Biodiversity
                Ecology/Conservation and Restoration Ecology

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article