30
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Evaluation of paranasal sinuses on available computed tomography in head and neck cancer patients: An assessment tool for nasotracheal intubation

      letter
      ,
      Indian Journal of Anaesthesia
      Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Sir, Nasotracheal intubation is a commonly employed airway plan during head and neck cancer surgeries.[1] Common anatomical abnormalities in the nose are septal deviations and septal spurs, usually presenting on one side of the septum.[2] There are many ways by which we can detect the patency of the nostrils, for example, fibre-optic nasoendoscopy,[1] rate of airflow through each nostril[3]; the patient may be able to confirm a clearer nostril after vasoconstrictors have been applied to the nasal mucosa.[4] Most common complication encountered during nasotracheal intubation is trauma to nasal mucosa or turbinates, leading to bleeding.[5] One of the commonly encountered anaesthetic complications is false passage and tearing off of the endotracheal tube (ETT) cuff.[6] This report presents two cases where cuff tear of two successive ETTs occurred following nasotracheal intubation. Two male patients, diagnosed with head and neck cancer, were posted for surgery under general anaesthesia with nasotracheal intubation. After counselling the patients for nasotracheal intubation, attaching the standard monitors and placement of IV line, general anaesthesia was instituted as per hospital protocol. A 7.5 mm internal diameter (ID) ETT was lubricated with lidocaine jelly 2% and was inserted smoothly through the right nostril in both cases. After confirmation of ETT placement in the trachea with end-tidal carbon dioxide, it was attached to closed circuit with positive pressure ventilation and oxygen at 1L/min along with isoflurane. However, failure to maintain pilot balloon inflation and a low airway pressure along with reduced expiratory tidal volume were noted on monitors. After ruling out leaks in the circuit, cuff damage of the ETT was suspected. The ETT was removed which showed a small tear in cuff. The second attempt at nasotracheal intubation, with a smaller size ETT 7 mm ID was carried out successfully through the same nostril, which also met with the same result. Both the ETTs were examined, and a cuff tear was noted at the same location [Figure 1a]. We noticed cuff tear of two ETTs at similar spots, in our second patient [Figure 1b]. During the interim period of computed tomography (CT) scan evaluation, the patient was ventilated using bag-mask technique. Figure 1 (a) Arrows showing bubbles from the tore endotracheal tube cuff. (b) Arrows showing the linear tear The morbidity associated with cuff tear includes aspiration of saliva, blood or gastric contents, anaesthetic gas leak from the breathing circuit[6] and ineffective ventilation leading to hypoxia. Magill's forceps were not used in either case. As shown in Figure 1, the tear in the cuff is longitudinal suggesting the damage had been caused by a sharp edge. Retrospective evaluation of the CT images of paranasal sinuses (PNS) revealed angulated bony spur in the posterior septum of the right nasal cavity with a deviated septum in both the patients [Figure 2a and b]. The cuff of the ETT can be damaged due to the presence of a bony spur in the nasal septum, use of Magill's forceps, use of lignocaine spray on ETT or placing the ETT in hot water before use as noted in a series of 725 nasotracheal intubations using polyvinylchloride ETT.[7] An unusual case of cuff malfunction due to the suture material going through the pilot line[6] and accidental damage to ETT by the oscillating saw during head and neck surgery[8] was also reported. In our cases, the cuff damage occurred before the start of the surgery. Figure 2 (a) Arrow showing the nasal bony spur of patient1. (b) Arrow showing the nasal bony spur of patient 2 The CT of PNS is routinely performed preoperatively in head and neck surgery patients by the surgical colleagues. If nasotracheal intubation is planned in such patients, we suggest the anaesthesia team to evaluate the CT of PNS to rule out nasal spur on the side where the nasotracheal intubation is to be performed to prevent the complication of cuff damage. Financial support and sponsorship Nil. Conflicts of interest There are no conflicts of interest.

          Related collections

          Most cited references8

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Asymptomatic intranasal abnormalities influencing the choice of nostril for nasotracheal intubation.

          We have studied the prevalence of intranasal abnormalities that may influence the choice of nostril for intubation, using the fibreoptic laryngoscope, in 60 oral surgery patients presenting for nasotracheal intubation under general anaesthesia, who had no symptoms or signs of nasal obstruction. Videotape recordings were made during each nasendoscopy and later analysed by an anaesthetist and an otolaryngologist. A total of 68% of patients had intranasal abnormalities (10% bilateral and 58% unilateral) which resulted in one nostril being more patent than the other and therefore considered more suitable for intubation. The most common abnormality was deviated nasal septum which occurred in 57% of the study group; 22% were minor deviations, 13% were major deviations and 22% were impactions. Other abnormalities were simple spurs, unilateral polyp and hypertrophy of the inferior turbinate. In view of the relatively high incidence of intranasal pathology revealed on endoscopic examination, anaesthetists should consider using the fibreoptic laryngoscope to select the best nostril when performing nasotracheal intubation.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            [Cuff damage during naso-tracheal intubation for general anesthesia in oral surgery].

            In our hospital, twenty-one cases of endotracheal tube cuff rupture during naso-tracheal intubation were noted in cases using 725 polyvinyl chloride (PVC) tracheal tubes. We analysed the causes of cuff troubles in these 21 samples of tubes. When the cuffs were inflated, they were not capable of containing the air in most cases. Some cuffs had small holes (described as pinholes), and the others had longer slits on scrape marks and burst. These scrape marks may have been caused by the object with sharp edges such as spina or crista of the nasal septum, or otherwise by the tip of intubation forceps. The cuff material appeared to be slightly hardened in some samples which may be due to the lubrication. We usually lubricated the tube with lidocaine spray or gel formulation and then sometimes placed it in hot water to soften it for avoiding naso-mucosal injury. It is not generally recommended to place tubes in hot water, as this procedure may soften the cuff and make it more suspectible to damage. The clarification is also needed on the use of lidocaine. Although the gel formulation is acceptable, but the spray formulation is known to react with cuff material and make it more susceptible to inducing blistering, pinholes and sudden rupture of PVC cuffs. We conclude that these cuff damages might have occurred from various causes. A main cause must be passing the tube through the narrow nasal turbinate with spina or crista. Other causes could not only be the use of Magill forceps but also lubrication of the tube with lidocaine spray and placing it in hot water.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Intra-operative endotracheal tube damage: Anaesthetic challenges

              Sir, Endotracheal tube (ETT) damage during surgery is increasingly reported in the literature. It can range from a simple cuff leak to a total transection of the tube during the surgical procedure, and the replacement can be challenging. We report a case of accidental damage to the nasotracheal tube by the oscillating saw during head and neck surgery, which was replaced immediately using a gum elastic bougie (GEB). The purpose of this case report is to highlight the use of GEB in tube exchange and to discuss the various options in the management of a damaged ETT intra-operatively. A 70-year-old lady with controlled hypertension was undergoing left inferior partial maxillectomy and excision of maxillary sinus under general anaesthesia. Her baseline heart rate and blood pressure were 82/min and 146/84 mmHg, respectively. Following intravenous induction and adequate muscle relaxation, right nasotracheal intubation was performed for better surgical access and to retain the tube overnight. During the excision of the maxilla and vomer, the surgeon suddenly noticed bubbling of air through the blood. On suction, we could visualize a hole in the nasotracheal tube. The ventilator showed airway leak and alarm. We ventilated her with 100% oxygen and continuous suction was applied and haemostasis attained. The only option available was to replace the damaged tube. Removing an ETT without a bougie or tube exchanger could be risky if unable to reintubate. Hence, a lubricated GEB was passed through the damaged tube, which was then removed and a new one railroaded over the bougie. Another option was to intubate orally but, because we wanted to retain the tube post-operatively, we tried nasotracheally. The rent in the damaged tube was evident as shown in the figure. Surgical procedure continued, neuromuscular block was reversed and nasotracheal tube retained. Vitals remained stable and she was extubated the next day. It is essential to have difficult airway gadgets like GEB, tube exchangers, retrograde intubation set, McCoy laryngoscopes, newer laryngoscopes, fibreoptic bronchoscope, etc. in all operation theatres and intensive care units. GEB and tube exchangers are cheap, easily available and life-saving gadgets used in difficult airway management and tube-exchanging scenarios.[1 2] A cuff leak can be managed by throat packing but, if there is a chance for aspiration of blood, it is better to replace the tube immediately. Fibreoptic intubation is not ideal in a bloody field or in emergency. In a dry field, if time permits, and in an experienced hand, it could be a good option. Be prepared for cricothyrotomy and jet ventilation (using a needle or cannula) or surgical cricothyrotomy if intubation fails. Tracheostomy set and tubes should be available whenever difficult airway cases are dealt with, but considered only as a last resort. Prevent aspiration of blood by head tilt and suction if needed. Peskin and Sachs in 1986 published a case report of intra-operative management of a partially severed ETT during orthognathic surgery.[3] They passed a smaller-sized tube through the damaged one, which may be difficult to pass nasotracheally. Balakrishnan and Kuriakose in 2005 reported an incidence of ETT damage during head and neck surgery as a result of harmonic scalpel and replaced the tube with the help of a tube exchanger.[4] Bidgoli et al. reported a serious anaesthetic complication of a Le Fort 1 osteotomy leading to surgical transection of the nasotracheal tube and its management.[5] Another report of accidental transection of armoured nasal ETT during surgery for Crouzon syndrome is presented by Murthy et al., where they reintubated with an oral flexometallic tube.[6] Chalkeidis et al. reported a case of ETT damage during neurosurgical procedure where the armoured oral ETT was bitten and cut at two points where the anaesthesiologist's finger could occlude the defect and surgery could continue.[7] In a recent and interesting case report from Ladi and Aphale, an accidental transection of a flexometallic tube occurred during partial maxillectomy, where the tube was transected by the Giglisaw.[8] They found it difficult to remove the proximal and distal parts of the tube because of the intact nylon rings connecting them. Hence, they performed a tracheostomy and secured the airway and later removed the damaged tube. An anaesthesiologist should be on the alert when the surgeon is operating around the airway, especially with sharp instruments, as there is a potential to damage the tube. Immediate recognition, confirmation and prompt management can be life-saving.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Indian J Anaesth
                Indian J Anaesth
                IJA
                Indian Journal of Anaesthesia
                Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd (India )
                0019-5049
                0976-2817
                December 2016
                : 60
                : 12
                : 960-961
                Affiliations
                [1]Department of Anaesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain, Tata Memorial Centre, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
                Author notes
                Address for correspondence: Dr. Raghu Sudarshan Thota, Department of Anaesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain, Tata Memorial Centre, E Borges Road, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India. E-mail: ragstho24@ 123456rediffmail.com
                Article
                IJA-60-960
                10.4103/0019-5049.195502
                5168902
                7a385a10-6d1d-4d13-8a82-2382df7bf664
                Copyright: © Indian Journal of Anaesthesia

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

                History
                Categories
                Letters to Editor

                Anesthesiology & Pain management
                Anesthesiology & Pain management

                Comments

                Comment on this article