10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Multidetector CT angiography in the follow-up of patients treated with renal artery stents: value of different reformation techniques compared with axial source images.

      Journal of endovascular therapy : an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists
      Aged, Angiography, instrumentation, Angioplasty, Balloon, Artifacts, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Observer Variation, Predictive Value of Tests, Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Renal Artery, radiography, Renal Artery Obstruction, therapy, Reproducibility of Results, Research Design, Retrospective Studies, Severity of Illness Index, Stents, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Treatment Outcome, User-Computer Interface

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          To evaluate the role of 4 different reformation techniques in comparison with axial images from multidetector computed tomographic angiography (MDCTA) in the follow-up of renal artery stents. Data on 40 patients (20 men; mean age 65 years) who underwent MDCTA as part of their routine follow-up after successful primary stenting of a main renal artery were retrospectively analyzed. Multiplanar reformation (MPR), curved planar reformation (CPR), volume rendering threshold (VRT), and virtual angioscopy (VA) were reviewed by 2 independent observers who were blinded to the results of the axial source images, which served as the gold standard. The stenosis degree was scored as I = 0%, II <50%, III = 51%-75%, IV = 76%-99%, or V = occlusion; a stenosis >50% was considered hemodynamically significant. Five hemodynamically significant stenoses were identified on axial images. The correlation with axial images was perfect for both observers using MPR and CPR (kappa = 1 for each observer); corresponding results were kappa = 0.69 and kappa = 0.64 for VRT and kappa = 0.88 and kappa = 0.83 for VA, respectively. The interobserver correlations were excellent for all reformation techniques (kappa = 0.95 to 1). Compared to axial images, MPR and CPR correlated perfectly with axial images; VA performed surprisingly well, while VRT was affected by artifacts and consequently showed inferior results.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Comments

          Comment on this article