14
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Microbial Maintenance: A Critical Review on Its Quantification

      research-article
      Microbial Ecology
      Springer-Verlag

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Microbial maintenance is an important concept in microbiology. Its quantification, however, is a subject of continuous debate, which seems to be caused by (1) its definition, which includes nongrowth components other than maintenance; (2) the existence of partly overlapping concepts; (3) the evolution of variables as constants; and (4) the neglect of cell death in microbial dynamics. The two historically most important parameters describing maintenance, the specific maintenance rate and the maintenance coefficient, are based on partly different nongrowth components. There is thus no constant relation between these parameters and previous equations on this subject are wrong. In addition, the partial overlap between these parameters does not allow the use of a simple combination of these parameters. This also applies for combinations of a threshold concentration with one of the other estimates of maintenance. Maintenance estimates should ideally explicitly describe each nongrowth component. A conceptual model is introduced that describes their relative importance and reconciles the various concepts and definitions. The sensitivity of maintenance on underlying components was analyzed and indicated that overall maintenance depends nonlinearly on relative death rates, relative growth rates, growth yield, and endogenous metabolism. This quantitative sensitivity analysis explains the felt need to develop growth-dependent adaptations of existing maintenance parameters, and indicates the importance of distinguishing the various nongrowth components. Future experiments should verify the sensitivity of maintenance components under cellular and environmental conditions.

          Related collections

          Most cited references73

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The maintenance energy of bacteria in growing cultures.

          S Pirt (1965)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Energetics of bacterial growth: balance of anabolic and catabolic reactions.

            Biomass formation represents one of the most basic aspects of bacterial metabolism. While there is an abundance of information concerning individual reactions that result in cell duplication, there has been surprisingly little information on the bioenergetics of growth. For many years, it was assumed that biomass production (anabolism) was proportional to the amount of ATP which could be derived from energy-yielding pathways (catabolism), but later work showed that the ATP yield (YATP) was not necessarily a constant. Continuous-culture experiments indicated that bacteria utilized ATP for metabolic reactions that were not directly related to growth (maintenance functions). Mathematical derivations showed that maintenance energy appeared to be a growth rate-independent function of the cell mass and time. Later work, however, showed that maintenance energy alone could not account for all the variations in yield. Because only some of the discrepancy could be explained by the secretion of metabolites (overflow metabolism) or the diversion of catabolism to metabolic pathways which produced less ATP, it appeared that energy-excess cultures had mechanisms of spilling energy. Bacteria have the potential to spill excess ATP in futile enzyme cycles, but there has been little proof that such cycles are significant. Recent work indicated that bacteria can also use futile cycles of potassium, ammonia, and protons through the cell membrane to dissipate ATP either directly or indirectly. The utility of energy spilling in bacteria has been a curiosity. The deprivation of energy from potential competitors is at best a teleological explanation that cannot be easily supported by standard theories of natural selection. The priming of intracellular intermediates for future growth or protection of cells from potentially toxic end products (e.g., methylglyoxal) seems a more plausible explanation.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              The growth of micro-organisms in relation to their energy supply.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                peter.van.Bodegom@ecology.falw.vu.nl
                Journal
                Microb Ecol
                Microbial Ecology
                Springer-Verlag (New York )
                0095-3628
                1432-184X
                1 March 2007
                May 2007
                : 53
                : 4
                : 513-523
                Affiliations
                Department of Systems Ecology, De Boelelaan 1085, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                Article
                9049
                10.1007/s00248-006-9049-5
                1915598
                17333428
                7b5795e3-12c5-4950-9722-53df9c4636ac
                © Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2007
                History
                : 1 February 2005
                : 1 February 2005
                : 1 February 2005
                Categories
                Article
                Custom metadata
                © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

                Microbiology & Virology
                Microbiology & Virology

                Comments

                Comment on this article