66
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Transoral Incisionless Fundoplication Effective in Eliminating GERD Symptoms in Partial Responders to Proton Pump Inhibitor Therapy at 6 Months : The TEMPO Randomized Clinical Trial

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background. Incomplete control of troublesome regurgitation and extraesophageal manifestations of chronic gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a known limitation of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy. This multicenter randomized study compared the efficacy of transoral incisionless fundoplication (TIF) against PPIs in controlling these symptoms in patients with small hiatal hernias. Methods. Between June and August 2012, 63 patients were randomized at 7 US community hospitals. Patients in the PPI group were placed on maximum standard dose (MSD). Patients in the TIF group underwent esophagogastric fundoplication using the EsophyX 2 device. Primary outcome was elimination of daily troublesome regurgitation or extraesophageal symptoms. Secondary outcomes were normalization of esophageal acid exposure (EAE), PPI usage and healing of esophagitis. Results. Of 63 randomized patients (40 TIF and 23 PPI), 3 were lost to follow-up leaving 39 TIF and 21 PPI patients for analysis. At 6-month follow-up, troublesome regurgitation was eliminated in 97% of TIF patients versus 50% of PPI patients, relative risk (RR) = 1.9, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.2-3.11 ( P = .006). Globally, 62% of TIF patients experienced elimination of regurgitation and extraesophageal symptoms versus 5% of PPI patients, RR = 12.9, 95% CI = 1.9-88.9 ( P = .009). EAE was normalized in 54% of TIF patients (off PPIs) versus 52% of PPI patients (on MSD), RR = 1.0, 95% CI = 0.6-1.7 ( P = .914). Ninety percent of TIF patients were off PPIs. Conclusion. At 6-month follow-up, TIF was more effective than MSD PPI therapy in eliminating troublesome regurgitation and extraesophageal symptoms of GERD.

          Related collections

          Most cited references30

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Laparoscopic antireflux surgery vs esomeprazole treatment for chronic GERD: the LOTUS randomized clinical trial.

          Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a chronic, relapsing disease with symptoms that have negative effects on daily life. Two treatment options are long-term medication or surgery. To evaluate optimized esomeprazole therapy vs standardized laparoscopic antireflux surgery (LARS) in patients with GERD. The LOTUS trial, a 5-year exploratory randomized, open, parallel-group trial conducted in academic hospitals in 11 European countries between October 2001 and April 2009 among 554 patients with well-established chronic GERD who initially responded to acid suppression. A total of 372 patients (esomeprazole, n = 192; LARS, n = 180) completed 5-year follow-up. Interventions Two hundred sixty-six patients were randomly assigned to receive esomeprazole, 20 to 40 mg/d, allowing for dose adjustments; 288 were randomly assigned to undergo LARS, of whom 248 actually underwent the operation. Time to treatment failure (for LARS, defined as need for acid suppressive therapy; for esomeprazole, inadequate symptom control after dose adjustment), expressed as estimated remission rates and analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Estimated remission rates at 5 years were 92% (95% confidence interval [CI], 89%-96%) in the esomeprazole group and 85% (95% CI, 81%-90%) in the LARS group (log-rank P = .048). The difference between groups was no longer statistically significant following best-case scenario modeling of the effects of study dropout. The prevalence and severity of symptoms at 5 years in the esomeprazole and LARS groups, respectively, were 16% and 8% for heartburn (P = .14), 13% and 2% for acid regurgitation (P < .001), 5% and 11% for dysphagia (P < .001), 28% and 40% for bloating (P < .001), and 40% and 57% for flatulence (P < .001). Mortality during the study was low (4 deaths in the esomeprazole group and 1 death in the LARS group) and not attributed to treatment, and the percentages of patients reporting serious adverse events were similar in the esomeprazole group (24.1%) and in the LARS group (28.6%). This multicenter clinical trial demonstrated that with contemporary antireflux therapy for GERD, either by drug-induced acid suppression with esomeprazole or by LARS, most patients achieve and remain in remission at 5 years. clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00251927.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The use of unequal randomisation ratios in clinical trials: a review.

            To examine reasons given for the use of unequal randomisation in randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Setting of the trial; intervention being tested; randomisation ratio; sample size calculation; reason given for randomisation. Review of trials using unequal randomisation. DATABASES AND SOURCES: Cochrane library, Medline, Pub Med and Science Citation Index. A total of 65 trials were identified; 56 were two-armed trials and nine trials had more than two arms. Of the two-arm trials, 50 trials recruited patients in favour of the experimental group. Various reasons for the use of unequal randomisation were given. Six studies stated that they used unequal randomisation to reduce the cost of the trial, with one screening trial limited by the availability of the intervention. Other reasons for using unequal allocation were: avoiding loss of power from drop-out or cross-over, ethics and the gaining of additional information on the treatment. Thirty seven trials papers (57%) did not state why they had used unequal randomisation and only 14 trials (22%) appeared to have taken the unequal randomisation into account in their sample size calculation. Although unequal randomisation offers a number of advantages to trials the method is rarely used and is especially under-utilised to reduce trial costs. Unequal randomisation should be considered more in trial design especially where there are large differences between treatment costs.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Guidelines for surgical treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Surg Innov
                Surg Innov
                SRI
                spsri
                Surgical Innovation
                SAGE Publications (Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA )
                1553-3506
                1553-3514
                February 2015
                February 2015
                : 22
                : 1
                : 26-40
                Affiliations
                [1 ]The George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC, USA
                [2 ]Reston Surgical Associates, Reston, VA, USA
                [3 ]Livingston Hospital and Healthcare Services, Inc, CAH, Salem, KY, USA
                [4 ]Advanced Gastroenterology, Inc, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA
                [5 ]Saint Mary Medical Center, Hobart, IN, USA
                [6 ]Internal Medicine Associates, Merrillville, IN, USA
                [7 ]Indiana Medical Research, Elkhart, IN, USA
                [8 ]Unity Surgical Hospital, Mishawaka, IN, USA
                [9 ]Hancock Regional Hospital, Greenfield, IN, USA
                [10 ]Crossville Medical Group, Crossville, TN, USA
                [11 ]Cumberland Medical Center, Crossville, TN, USA
                Author notes
                [*]Karim S. Trad, MD, Department of Surgery, The George Washington University Medical Faculty Associates, 1800 Town Center Drive, #218, Reston, VA 20190, USA. Email: ktrad@ 123456mfa.gwu.edu
                Article
                10.1177_1553350614526788
                10.1177/1553350614526788
                4361451
                24756976
                7cd3e8a5-2d4a-4221-95fe-921ecc05ab5f
                © The Author(s) 2014

                This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 License ( http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page( http://www.uk.sagepub.com/aboutus/openaccess.htm).

                History
                Categories
                Original Clinical Science

                transoral incisionless fundoplication (tif),esophyx,extraesophageal gerd symptoms,regurgitation,proton pump inhibitor (ppi),heartburn

                Comments

                Comment on this article