At present, the target of most of the SARS-CoV-2 (Covid-19) vaccine development worldwide
is the spike protein (S) or, more specifically, the receptor-binding domain (RBD)
of the virus (1). According to The World Health Organization, almost all of these
vaccines will be delivered parentally by intramuscular injection (2). The goal is
to achieve broadly neutralizing IgG antibody production in response to a systemic
viremia and contribute to the mucosal immune defense. However, questions remain about
the relative impact that IgG makes to the mucosal response, whether or not it can
provide durable immunity, especially in the aging population, and to what degree it
contributes to the immunopathology of antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE).
Despite the reliance on the intramuscular approach, mucosal administration of vaccines
has been highly successful from ancient through modern times (3). The late Norwegian
immunologist, Per Brandtzaeg, was a strong advocate for the intranasal administration
of vaccines because of the regional effect that it has on the upper airways with the
production of both systemic and mucosal IgA and systemic IgG immunoglobulins (4).
He was also highly critical of the surgical removal of the adenoids and tonsils in
children, in part, due to impaired responses to vaccines (5). Perhaps the pediatric
population is being spared the ravages of the current pandemic due to the protective
nature of the adenoids and tonsils.
The tonsils and adenoids are part of the mucosal immune system known as Waldeyer’s
ring or the nasal associated lymphoid tissue (NALT). This organized mucosal associated
lymphatic tissue lies below the lamina propria of the nasal mucosa and is the primary
inductive site for the secretory immune system (6). It is in this region where all
the molecular and cellular conditions are available for the production of secretory
IgA (S-IgA) by plasma cells and memory-type IgA+ B cells independently of the bone
marrow (7).
Plasma B cells produce both monomeric (sIgA) and polymeric (pIgA) multimers, dimers,
tetramers and pentamers (8). This multivalency results in greater avidity for viral
peptides than IgG (9) and prevents the infiltration of pathogens known as immune exclusion
(10). The pIgA is actively transported across the cell membrane from the basolateral
to the apical surface of the secretory epithelium by the secretory component (SC)
of polymeric-immunoglobulin receptor (pIgR) as a secretory (SIgA) complex. As the
SIgA reaches the surface of the uninfected cell, SC separates from the SIgA where
both elements diffuse into the mucus layer and provide specific protective mechanisms
(11). In vitro, free SC binds to IL-8 and inhibits IL-8-mediated recruitment of neutrophils
to prevent neutrophil extracellular traps in the airways (see below) (12, 13). If
a cell has become infected by a virus, pIgA complex is absorbed through the basal
membrane by the pIgR where it is then internalized into the endoplasmic reticulum
leading to the intracellular neutralization of newly formed viral proteins which are
then eliminated through the apical surface into the intestinal or airway lumen (14).
The expression of the peripheral node addressin (PNAd) by the high-walled endothelial
venules of the NALT accounts for the trafficking of B and T lymphocytes to the salivary,
parotid and submaxillary gland lymph nodes (15, 16) where plasma B cells then migrate
to the salivary and parotid glands to express IgA that offers protection against bacterial
pathogens produced in the oral cavity as well as inhaled airborne virions (17). The
PNAd derived from NALT also promotes a mucosal and systemic humoral response that
includes that includes the lungs (18) and the genital mucosa (19).
Given that PNAd is expressed by the HEV in the NALT and bronchial associated lymphatic
tissues, its role in cellular immunity in response to vaccination is paramount since
up to 80% of lymphocytes in human tonsils are CD8+ memory cells (20). On the other
hand, naïve T cells were excluded from the mucosal-associated tissue in mice that
were challenged with influenza virus that suggested a mechanism of immune tolerance
in the upper airway. The activation of CD8+ cells by intranasal boosting with a recombinant
vaccinia virus encoding the spike protein of the SARS-CoV in mice resulted in pathogen
clearance from a lethal challenge of the virus (21). However, in Covid-19 patients,
lymphopenia is the hallmark of disease progression (22) and in particular, CD8+ and
natural killer cells (NK) decreased with progression of the disease (23). Not only
does the innate immune response fail to protect against Covid-19, but it may be the
underlying cause of the increased morbidity and mortality (24).
A large body of literature has demonstrated that protection of the lungs is afforded
by nasal administration of a variety of viral and bacterial vaccines (25–27). While
there are concerns about the durability of IgG antibodies to Covid-19 (28), IgA antibodies
to influenza generated by the diffuse NALT lining the nasal passages lasted for the
life of the animal (29).
The Covid-19 infection epitomizes a mucosal disease process. Close contact, aerosol
droplets, and fomites facilitate the transmission of the virus where it comes into
contact with the oronasal and conjunctival mucosa. Here, the spike protein of the
virus binds to the angiotensin-converting enzyme-2 (ACE2) receptor of the target cells
capable of replicating the virus (30). The nasal epithelium has the highest concentration
of ACE2, and the alveoli have the lowest (31). These findings reflect that the most
robust replication of the virus likely takes place in the nose and little or none
in the alveoli (32). Furthermore, the epithelial cells lining the salivary gland ducts
that are rich in the expression of ACE2 actively produce virions (33) that are spread
through aerosol droplets (34) that may be inhaled or aspirated into the lung. (31,
35) However, since IgA seroconversion occurs two days after the onset of infection,
and is detected earlier than IgM or IgG in Covid-19 patients (36), its presence in
the saliva not only provides the basis for point-of-care diagnostic testing (37) but
further supports the use of the intranasal administration of a vaccine in order to
neutralize the virus at its source—the upper airway.
However, despite the presence of antigen presenting cells in the nasal and oral mucosa,
SARS-CoV-1 was able to evade this innate immune response in Rhesus macaques (RM),
and within two days post infection (dpi) had breached the upper respiratory epithelium
where it infected the underlying mucosal dendritic cells and macrophages that subsequently
migrated from Waldeyer’s ring to draining lymph nodes and into the lungs where they
formed dense clusters around the alveoli (38). The sequestration of virus in intracellular
vesicles of the macrophages demonstrates the critical role that these antigen presenting
cells (APC) play in the dissemination of the virus to the lung and systemic compartment
especially since viral shedding of Covid-19 in the pharynx precedes viral replication
in the lungs (39).
While pre-existing immunity is considered beneficial, there is great concern that
the accelerated pace to develop a vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 will result in a detrimental
immune response, i.e., an antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE) of the infection (40).
Particularly disturbing is the fact that as a result of prior exposure to the “common
cold coronavirus” (CCC), T cell reactivity to SARS-CoV-2 antigen peptide pools is
in the 20–50% range in unexposed blood donors from across the globe (41). In fact,
one study showed that 90% of the human race tested positive for three of the four
CCCs (42). A recent study showed that 35% of seronegative Covid-19 healthy donors
had cross-reactive CD4+ T cells to the S protein probably acquired from previous infections
with human coronaviruses (43). The presence of durable cross-reactive T cell memory
responses would play a role in amplifying an anamnestic B cell response against those
common antigens (44, 45). Thus, prior sensitization to conserved epitopes could lead
to the production of non- neutralizing or sub-neutralizing binding antibodies, principally
of the IgG isotype, and form antigen-antibody complexes. These immune complexes (IC)
act as molecular bridges between a virus and immune cells (46) expressing either a
complement receptor, IgG Fc receptor (FcγR) on the surface and neonatal Fc receptor
(FcRn) (47) intracellularly. The FcγR can function as a mimic for the ACE2 receptor
that is not expressed on all immune cells and allows for neutralizing antibodies to
gain access to the reproductive machinery of those cells (48). Ultimately, the ratio
of activating versus inhibitory FcγRs will determine the severity of the disease based
on the subtype of IgG that it binds and the subsequent signaling cascades it produces
(49). When the IC binds to an activating FcγR on APCs it also results in the production
of proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines that lead to lung and other organ injury
(50, 51). This hypercytokinemia causes an increased transudate and production of hyaluronan
in the alveoli that absorbs up to 1,000 times its molecular weight with water resulting
in the severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) and death (52). Even though ADE is
primarily associated with IgG antibodies, the phenomenon has also been observed with
IgA antibodies in HIV infection (53, 54). However, other than HIV, IgA has not been
identified with ADE in any other viral infection.
Two recent studies confirmed that fully neutralizing IgG antibodies led to disease
enhancement. One study showed that monoclonal antibodies targeting the MERS-CoV RBD
caused a conformational change in the spike protein that blocked viral entry into
cells expressing its cognate receptor, dipeptidyl peptidase 4 and directed its entry
into FcγR expressing cells (55). In the second study, an IM vaccination that produced
an anti-spike IgG (S-IgG) and an intravenous administration of S-IgG monoclonal antibodies
correlated with acute lung injury during a SARS-CoV infection of RM (56). Although
the anti-S-IgG reduced the expression of viral RNA in the lungs, it led to a massive
accumulation of monocyte/macrophages within 2 dpi that caused significant diffuse
alveolar damage. An antibody directed against the FcγR reduced the production of IL-8
and MCP1 by wound-healing macrophages suggesting that the mechanism of acute lung
injury was mediated by the anti-S-IgG antibody.
It is not known if the expression of neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn) in the endothelial,
airway and gastrointestinal tissues (57) plays a role in IgG mediated enhancement
of SARS-CoV-2. Coronaviruses as well as other viruses that form immune complexes with
IgG antibodies are transcytosed through the plasma membrane and transported intracellularly
by the FcRn into the endosomal system (58). Both the IgG antibody (59) and the mouse
hepatitis virus, a prototypic member of the CoV family (60), depend on the same Rab
GTPases in the endosomal system for the recycling of IgG and for the proteolytic processing
of their fusion proteins respectively. This escorted means of endocytosis of the virus
could be the underlying mechanism of the endovascular events observed late in the
infection (61). Of particular note, 82% of the cases of Kawasaki-like disease in children
in France had IgG antibodies for SARS-CoV-2 (62).
Although the induction of a mucosal response by systemic immunization remains poorly
understood (63), the use of an appropriate adjuvant could change the outcome and lead
to the expression of IgA (64). Nevertheless, the intranasal administration of a vaccine
is inherently associated with an IgA response. An additional benefit of IgA is based
on its non-inflammatory effects since neither the secreted, monomeric form (sIgA)
found in serum nor the secretory, polymeric form (S-IgA) found in mucosal secretions
activate any of the three complement pathways (65, 66). And, when bound to the antigen,
IgA blocks the binding of IgG and IgM and thus prevents the complement-mediated inflammatory
effects associated with these isotypes (67). Furthermore, all forms of the IgA antibody,
serum and secretory, monoclonal and polyclonal, interfered with complement-dependent
phagocytosis by neutrophils mediated by IgG antibodies (66). This would be beneficial
in limiting the recruitment of neutrophils to the lungs and the inflammasomes associated
with viral infections (68).
In the context of a coronavirus vaccine, two separate studies compared the efficacy
of an intramuscular versus a mucosal route. The first study used a recombinant adeno-associated
virus (rAAV)-based RBD (RBD-rAAV) vaccine to the SARS-CoV spike protein (69) and the
second studied three adenovirus-based vaccine candidates against MERS-CoV (70). In
both studies, the intranasal route was superior to the IM route in terms of a systemic
and local humoral response, and both had a stronger systemic and pulmonary CTL response.
However, neither the IM nor intranasal administration of the SARS-CoV RBD-rAAV vaccine
produced any ADE which the authors attributed to the properties of the adenovirus
vector and its specificity for the particular epitope within the RBD. But perhaps
most importantly, only the intranasal and subligual administration of the MERS-CoV
full-length spike protein induced IgA antibodies that were found in the broncholaveolar
lavage fluid. Thus far, only one paper has clearly substantiated the validity of previous
articles that support the nasal administration of a Covid-19 vaccine (71) although
a number of academic and biopharma entities have announced their successes with press
releases.
While IgA is the most highly expressed antibody in the body, its production by the
mucosal-associated lymphatic tissue declines with age. This decline is one aspect
of a condition known as immunosenescence that is particularly relevant in the current
pandemic caused by Covid-19 in which the elderly are the most vulnerable population.
However, a study in mice showed that the aging process affects the NALT to a lesser
degree than the gastrointestinal associated lymphatic tissue (72). This suggests that
all of the necessary immunocompetent cells are maintained in the nasal mucosa to mount
an effective immune response. However, the need still remains to determine an appropriate
adjuvant for mucosal administration (73) of a Covid-19 vaccine especially one that
would avoid a Th17 response that contributes to the eosinophilic infiltration in the
lungs (74).
If seen only from an immunological perspective, the IM administration of a vaccine
is not without its drawbacks (75). There is a significant concern about the lack of
availability of vials, needles, and syringes to meet the global demand. Then, there
is the need for trained personnel to administer the vaccine intramuscularly that can
result in as many as five needle-stick injuries per 100 injections worldwide (76).
Also, there may be poor compliance due to the anticipated pain at the injection site
and concerns about the arms race mentality that may have flattened the traditional
trajectory required for a safe and effective vaccine. And, lastly, there is a significant
concern for the reuse of needles and syringes in developing countries that can lead
to blood-borne viral infections and for the proper disposal of this medical waste
in these countries.
Regulatory agencies worldwide should require a comparison of the parenteral administration
with mucosal delivery and accelerate the approval of the appropriate adjuvants, particularly
for the aging population. If successful, mucosal delivery will play a protective role
in preventing the invasion of the virus early in the infectious process and prevent
the viremia to which an IgG response is also generated. Mucosal delivery also represents
a more cost-effective and efficient means of delivering a vaccine in the time of a
pandemic. And ultimately, there is less likelihood of an immunopathological immune
response known as ADE that is invariably associated with IgG.
Author Contributions
The author confirms being the sole contributor of this work and has approved it for
publication.
Conflict of Interest
CT is the Founder and President of Immugen Pharma LLC.