10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Clinical impact of body mass index on the outcome of the SPARC-sling system for the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence.

      World Journal of Urology
      Aged, Body Mass Index, Cohort Studies, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Gynecologic Surgical Procedures, Humans, Middle Aged, Multivariate Analysis, Obesity, complications, Proportional Hazards Models, Retrospective Studies, Suburethral Slings, Treatment Outcome, Urinary Incontinence, Stress, surgery, Urodynamics, physiology, Urologic Surgical Procedures, methods

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Of this observational study was to evaluate the clinical outcome of the suprapubic arc (SPARC)-sling system in women with stress urinary incontinence according to body mass index (BMI). A total of 151 women underwent SPARC between June 2001 and March 2009 at a single tertiary academic center. A complete urodynamic investigation was performed preoperatively. A minimum follow-up of 12 months was required, which left data of 93 individuals for analyses. Participants were divided into the following: A, non-obese (BMI 18.5 to <25 kg/m(2)), B, overweight (BMI 25 to <30 kg/m(2)), and C, obese (BMI 30-35 kg/m(2)). Objective and subjective cure rates, as well as overall success rate and self-perceived severity of bother, were measured. Moreover, participants were asked about their satisfaction after surgery. Median follow-up was 7.6 years. Mean number of pads/day, pad test, and self-perceived severity of bother were significantly reduced overall, as well as in each BMI category (P < 0.001). In multivariable analyses, BMI was not an independent predictor of objective cure rate, coded either as continuous (P = 0.108) or as categorical variable (P for trend 0.301). Similarly, BMI was not an independent predictor of subjective cure rate, both coded as continuous (P = 0.475) and as categorical variable (P for trend 0.690). Overall, 92% (A), 85% (B), and 80% (C) of participants were satisfied with the surgical outcome at follow-up, respectively. BMI failed to achieve independent predictor status regarding objective and subjective cure rate at follow-up. A high BMI is not a contraindication to SPARC, more studies are recommended to confirm these findings.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Comments

          Comment on this article