44
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      Submit your digital health research with an established publisher
      - celebrating 25 years of open access

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Student Response to Remote-Online Case-Based Learning: A Qualitative Study

      research-article
      , B Physio 1 , , , B AppSc, PG Dip Musculoskeletal, PhD 1 , , B Physio, MPH, PhD 1
      (Reviewer), (Reviewer)
      JMIR Medical Education
      JMIR Publications Inc.
      case-based learning, Web conferencing, remote-online case-based learning, student satisfaction, perceived depth of learning

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Case-based learning (CBL) typically involves face-to-face interaction in small collaborative groups with a focus on self-directed study. To our knowledge, no published studies report an evaluation of Web conferencing in CBL.

          Objective

          The primary aim of this study was to explore student perceptions and attitudes in response to a remote-online case-based learning (RO-CBL) experience.

          Methods

          This study took place over a 2-week period in 2013 at Monash University, Victoria, Australia. A third year cohort (n=73) of physiotherapy students was invited to participate. Students were required to participate in 2 training sessions, followed by RO-CBL across 2 sessions. The primary outcome of interest was the student feedback on the quality of the learning experience during RO-CBL participation. This was explored with a focus group and a survey.

          Results

          Most students (68/73) completed the postintervention survey (nonparticipation rate 8%). RO-CBL was generally well received by participants, with 59% (40/68) of participates stating that they’d like RO-CBL to be used in the future and 78% (53/68) of participants believing they could meet the CBL’s learning objectives via RO-CBL. The 4 key themes relevant to student response to RO-CBL that emerged from the focus groups and open-ended questions on the postintervention survey were how RO-CBL compared to expectations, key benefits of RO-CBL including flexibility and time and cost savings, communication challenges in the online environment compared to face-to-face, and implications of moving to an online platform.

          Conclusions

          Web conferencing may be a suitable medium for students to participate in CBL. Participants were satisfied with the learning activity and felt they could meet the CBL’s learning objectives. Further study should evaluate Web conferencing CBL across an entire semester in regard to student satisfaction, perceived depth of learning, and learning outcomes.

          Related collections

          Most cited references21

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Problem-Based Learning: What and How Do Students Learn?

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Overview of Problem-based Learning: Definitions and Distinctions

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Effective e-learning for health professionals and students--barriers and their solutions. A systematic review of the literature--findings from the HeXL project.

              In 2003/4 the Information Management Research Institute, Northumbria University, conducted a research project to identify the barriers to e-learning for health professionals and students. The project also established possible ways to overcome these barriers. The North of England Workforce Development Confederation funded the project. The project comprised a systematic review of the literature on barriers to and solutions/critical success factors for e-learning in the health field. Fifty-seven references were suitable for analysis. This review was supplemented by a questionnaire survey of learners and an interview study of learning providers to ensure that data identified from the literature were grounded in reality. The main barriers are: requirement for change; costs; poorly designed packages; inadequate technology; lack of skills; need for a component of face-to-face teaching; time intensive nature of e-learning; computer anxiety. A range of solutions can solve these barriers. The main solutions are: standardization; strategies; funding; integration of e-learning into the curriculum; blended teaching; user friendly packages; access to technology; skills training; support; employers paying e-learning costs; dedicated work time for e-learning. The authors argue that librarians can play an important role in e-learning: providing support and support materials; teaching information skills; managing and providing access to online information resources; producing their own e-learning packages; assisting in the development of other packages.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                JMIR Med Educ
                JMIR Med Educ
                JME
                JMIR Medical Education
                JMIR Publications Inc. (Toronto, Canada )
                2369-3762
                Jan-Jun 2016
                22 March 2016
                : 2
                : 1
                : e3
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Monash University Department of Physiotherapy MelbourneAustralia
                Author notes
                Corresponding Author: Peter Nicklen pdnic1@ 123456student.monash.edu
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5331-7808
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3161-4964
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2612-5162
                Article
                v2i1e3
                10.2196/mededu.5025
                5041370
                7e190b77-3961-4d86-a675-0c09050777cf
                ©Peter Nicklen, Jennifer L Keating, Stephen Maloney. Originally published in JMIR Medical Education (http://mededu.jmir.org), 22.03.2016.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Medical Education, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://mededu.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.

                History
                : 12 August 2015
                : 22 September 2015
                : 13 November 2015
                : 4 January 2016
                Categories
                Original Paper
                Original Paper

                case-based learning,web conferencing,remote-online case-based learning,student satisfaction,perceived depth of learning

                Comments

                Comment on this article