5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Impacts of Diagnosis-Related Groups Payment on the Healthcare Providers’ Behavior in China: A Cross-Sectional Study Among Physicians

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Purpose

          Currently, China is piloting diagnosis-related groups (DRG) payment system in 30 cities. The main aim of this study was to explore the respondents’ impressions regarding the hospitals’ policies and physicians’ behavior change brought by the DRG payment system, and investigate whether and how the hospitals’ policies affect the physicians’ behavior.

          Methods

          We distributed questionnaires designed for this study to 200 physicians. Data analysis consisted of descriptive statistics, T-test, and network analysis.

          Results

          Respondents stated that the hospitals had adopted several policies in response to DRG payment and DRG payment could reduce overtreatment and improve efficiency. However, it also led to several negative effects including an increased explanation to the patients, hindering new technologies, case splitting, and cherry picking. In addition, there was no evidence that harmful effects such as refusing patients and premature discharge existed. Overall, the benefits outweighed the drawbacks of DRG. Moreover, the hospitals’ policies could effectively change physician behaviors. Our results indicated that promoting the implementation of clinical pathways had the most positive impact, while limiting costs and length of stay is not recommended.

          Conclusion

          In general, Chinese physicians who participated in the questionnaire possessed relatively positive attitudes towards the DRG payment system. Nevertheless, some of the negative impacts cannot be ignored. Meanwhile, the hospitals’ policies should be implemented with adequate consideration of the impact on physicians’ behavior.

          Related collections

          Most cited references28

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences

          G*Power (Erdfelder, Faul, & Buchner, 1996) was designed as a general stand-alone power analysis program for statistical tests commonly used in social and behavioral research. G*Power 3 is a major extension of, and improvement over, the previous versions. It runs on widely used computer platforms (i.e., Windows XP, Windows Vista, and Mac OS X 10.4) and covers many different statistical tests of the t, F, and chi2 test families. In addition, it includes power analyses for z tests and some exact tests. G*Power 3 provides improved effect size calculators and graphic options, supports both distribution-based and design-based input modes, and offers all types of power analyses in which users might be interested. Like its predecessors, G*Power 3 is free.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Analyzing and interpreting data from likert-type scales.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Early appraisal of China's huge and complex health-care reforms.

              China's 3 year, CN¥850 billion (US$125 billion) reform plan, launched in 2009, marked the first phase towards achieving comprehensive universal health coverage by 2020. The government's undertaking of systemic reform and its affirmation of its role in financing health care together with priorities for prevention, primary care, and redistribution of finance and human resources to poor regions are positive developments. Accomplishing nearly universal insurance coverage in such a short time is commendable. However, transformation of money and insurance coverage into cost-effective services is difficult when delivery of health care is hindered by waste, inefficiencies, poor quality of services, and scarcity and maldistribution of the qualified workforce. China must reform its incentive structures for providers, improve governance of public hospitals, and institute a stronger regulatory system, but these changes have been slowed by opposition from stakeholders and lack of implementation capacity. The pace of reform should be moderated to allow service providers to develop absorptive capacity. Independent, outcome-based monitoring and evaluation by a third-party are essential for mid-course correction of the plans and to make officials and providers accountable. Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Risk Manag Healthc Policy
                Risk Manag Healthc Policy
                rmhp
                rmhp
                Risk Management and Healthcare Policy
                Dove
                1179-1594
                01 June 2021
                2021
                : 14
                : 2263-2276
                Affiliations
                [1 ]College of Business Administration, Shenyang Pharmaceutical University , Shenyang, People’s Republic of China
                [2 ]Department of Pharmacy, Jinling Hospital , Nanjing, People’s Republic of China
                Author notes
                Correspondence: Lihua Sun College of Business Administration, Shenyang Pharmaceutical University , No. 103 Wenhua Road, Shenyang, 110016, People’s Republic of ChinaTel +86 24 2398 6553 Email slh-3632@163.com
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4076-5847
                Article
                308183
                10.2147/RMHP.S308183
                8180304
                34104017
                7e576872-fc8d-478a-9e77-a25734a8ca6b
                © 2021 Zhang and Sun.

                This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms ( https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).

                History
                : 01 March 2021
                : 09 May 2021
                Page count
                Figures: 3, Tables: 6, References: 33, Pages: 14
                Categories
                Original Research

                Social policy & Welfare
                diagnosis-related groups,providers’ behavior,payment system reform,china

                Comments

                Comment on this article