1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Outcomes of the Latarjet Procedure for the Treatment of Chronic Anterior Shoulder Instability: Patients With Prior Arthroscopic Bankart Repair Versus Primary Cases

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background:

          It remains unclear whether results differ between a Latarjet procedure performed after a failed arthroscopic Bankart repair and one performed as the primary operation.

          Purpose:

          To compare the postoperative outcomes of the Latarjet procedure when performed as primary surgery and as revision for a failed arthroscopic Bankart repair.

          Study Design:

          Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

          Methods:

          A multicenter retrospective comparative case-cohort analysis was performed for all patients undergoing a Latarjet procedure for recurrent anterior shoulder instability. Patients were separated into 2 groups depending on if the Latarjet procedure was performed after a failed arthroscopic Bankart repair (group 1) or as the first operation (group 2). Outcome measures included recurrent instability, reoperation rates, complications, pain, Walch-Duplay scores, and Simple Shoulder Test.

          Results:

          A total of 308 patients were eligible for participation in the study; 72 (23.4%) did not answer and were considered lost to follow-up, leaving 236 patients available for analysis. Mean follow-up was 3.4 ± 0.8 years. There were 20 patients in group 1 and 216 in group 2. Despite similar rates of recurrent instability (5.0% in group 1 vs 2.3% in group 2; P = .5) and revision surgery (0% in group 1 vs 6.5% in group 2; P = .3), group 1 demonstrated significantly worse pain scores (2.56 ± 2.7 vs 1.2 ± 1.7; P = .01) and patient-reported outcomes (Walch-Duplay: 52 ± 25.1 vs 72.2 ± 25.0; P = .0007; Simple Shoulder Test: 9.3 ± 2.4 vs 10.7 ± 1.9; P = .001) when compared with those patients undergoing primary Latarjet procedures.

          Conclusion:

          Functional outcome scores and postoperative pain are significantly worse in patients undergoing a Latarjet procedure after a failed arthroscopic Bankart repair when compared with patients undergoing primary Latarjet. The assumption that a failed a Bankart repair can be revised by a Latarjet with a similar result to a primary Latarjet appears to be incorrect. Surgeons should consider these findings when deciding on the optimal surgical procedure for recurrent shoulder instability.

          Related collections

          Most cited references38

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The instability severity index score. A simple pre-operative score to select patients for arthroscopic or open shoulder stabilisation.

          There is no simple method available to identify patients who will develop recurrent instability after an arthroscopic Bankart procedure and who would be better served by an open operation. We carried out a prospective case-control study of 131 consecutive unselected patients with recurrent anterior shoulder instability who underwent this procedure using suture anchors. At follow-up after a mean of 31.2 months (24 to 52) 19 (14.5%) had recurrent instability. The following risk factors were identified: patient age under 20 years at the time of surgery; involvement in competitive or contact sports or those involving forced overhead activity; shoulder hyperlaxity; a Hill-Sachs lesion present on an anteroposterior radiograph of the shoulder in external rotation and/or loss of the sclerotic inferior glenoid contour. These factors were integrated in a 10-point pre-operative instability severity index score and tested retrospectively on the same population. Patients with a score over 6 points had an unacceptable recurrence risk of 70% (p < 0.001). On this basis we believe that an arthroscopic Bankart repair is contraindicated in these patients, to whom we now suggest a Bristow-Latarjet procedure instead.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Complications and re-operations after Bristow-Latarjet shoulder stabilization: a systematic review.

            Various methods of bony stabilization, including modifications of Bristow and Latarjet procedures, are considered gold-standard treatment for recurrent anterior shoulder instability but are associated with unique complications and risk of reoperation. The purpose of this study was to identify the prevalence of these complications. We hypothesized that the Bristow-Latarjet procedure would be a successful technique for treatment of shoulder instability but associated with a risk of recurrent postoperative instability, reoperation, and other complications.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              [Treatment of recurrent dislocation of the shoulder].

              M LATARJET (2015)
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Am J Sports Med
                Am J Sports Med
                AJS
                amjsports
                The American Journal of Sports Medicine
                SAGE Publications (Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA )
                0363-5465
                1552-3365
                26 December 2019
                January 2020
                : 48
                : 1
                : 27-32
                Affiliations
                []Hopital Ambroise Paré, Paris, France
                []Groupe Maussins, Paris, France
                [§ ]Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
                []Institut Curie, Paris, France
                []Clinique du Sport, Paris, France
                [ ]Investigation performed at Hopital Ambroise Paré, Paris, France
                Author notes
                [*] [* ]Jean-David Werthel, MD, Hopital Ambroise Paré, 9 avenue Charles de Gaulle, Boulogne-Billancourt, 92100, France (email: jdwerthel@ 123456gmail.com ).
                Article
                10.1177_0363546519888909
                10.1177/0363546519888909
                7052410
                31877090
                7f18a254-12b8-46ca-a31a-98604a5fb177
                © 2019 The Author(s)

                This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License ( http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages ( https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).

                History
                : 30 April 2019
                : 27 September 2019
                Categories
                Articles
                Shoulder
                Custom metadata
                ts1

                shoulder instability,glenoid labrum
                shoulder instability, glenoid labrum

                Comments

                Comment on this article