Investigating linguistic coherence relations in child sexual abuse: A comparison of PTSD and non-PTSD children

Abstract

Background

Language is the most common way to communicate internal states and emotions into a narrative form. Studies on the use of language provide a useful understanding of how people process an event and interpret it.

Objective

The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of PTSD on the narrative coherence of children's reports of sexual abuse.

Participants and setting

Narrative coherence was analyzed within a group of 89 allegations of children ( M = 10; range: 4–16), who were victims of sexual abuse. Thirty-seven children presented the symptoms for a diagnosis of PTSD.

Method

Linguistic Inquiry Word Count (LIWC) was employed and narrative coherence was analyzed through some linguistic markers (first-person singular pronouns, conjunctions, and cognitive words).

Results

Results illustrated the effects of PTSD on the narrative coherence, in terms of first-person singular pronouns, conjunctions, and cognitive processes. Indeed, compared with traumatic narratives of children without PTSD, traumatic narratives of children with PTSD contained a greater number of first-person singular pronouns ( M _PTSD = 1.45 versus M _no-PTSD = 1.12) and a smaller number of conjunctions ( M _PTSD = .37 versus M _non-PTSD = .67), cognitive ( M _PTSD = 2.93 versus M _non-PTSD = 3.76) and insight words ( M _PTSD = 2.29 versus M _non-PTSD = 3.09). Regression analyses were used to examine if age and PTSD were predictors of the narrative coherence, suggesting the effects of PTSD in predicting the use of the first-person singular pronouns and the conjunctions.

Conclusion

This study could underline the importance of considering the PTSD in legal testimony of children who have been sexually abused.