24
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Development and validation of a multi-locus DNA metabarcoding method to identify endangered species in complex samples

      research-article
      1 , 2 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 3 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 1 , 2 , 20 , 1 ,
      GigaScience
      Oxford University Press
      Endangered species, CITES, Traditional medicines, DNA metabarcoding, Customs agencies, COI, matK, rbcL, cyt b, mini-barcodes

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          DNA metabarcoding provides great potential for species identification in complex samples such as food supplements and traditional medicines. Such a method would aid Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) enforcement officers to combat wildlife crime by preventing illegal trade of endangered plant and animal species. The objective of this research was to develop a multi-locus DNA metabarcoding method for forensic wildlife species identification and to evaluate the applicability and reproducibility of this approach across different laboratories. A DNA metabarcoding method was developed that makes use of 12 DNA barcode markers that have demonstrated universal applicability across a wide range of plant and animal taxa and that facilitate the identification of species in samples containing degraded DNA. The DNA metabarcoding method was developed based on Illumina MiSeq amplicon sequencing of well-defined experimental mixtures, for which a bioinformatics pipeline with user-friendly web-interface was developed. The performance of the DNA metabarcoding method was assessed in an international validation trial by 16 laboratories, in which the method was found to be highly reproducible and sensitive enough to identify species present in a mixture at 1% dry weight content. The advanced multi-locus DNA metabarcoding method assessed in this study provides reliable and detailed data on the composition of complex food products, including information on the presence of CITES-listed species. The method can provide improved resolution for species identification, while verifying species with multiple DNA barcodes contributes to an enhanced quality assurance.

          Related collections

          Most cited references36

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Rapid isolation of high molecular weight plant DNA.

          A method is presented for the rapid isolation of high molecular weight plant DNA (50,000 base pairs or more in length) which is free of contaminants which interfere with complete digestion by restriction endonucleases. The procedure yields total cellular DNA (i.e. nuclear, chloroplast, and mitochondrial DNA). The technique is ideal for the rapid isolation of small amounts of DNA from many different species and is also useful for large scale isolations.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            A DNA barcode for land plants.

            DNA barcoding involves sequencing a standard region of DNA as a tool for species identification. However, there has been no agreement on which region(s) should be used for barcoding land plants. To provide a community recommendation on a standard plant barcode, we have compared the performance of 7 leading candidate plastid DNA regions (atpF-atpH spacer, matK gene, rbcL gene, rpoB gene, rpoC1 gene, psbK-psbI spacer, and trnH-psbA spacer). Based on assessments of recoverability, sequence quality, and levels of species discrimination, we recommend the 2-locus combination of rbcL+matK as the plant barcode. This core 2-locus barcode will provide a universal framework for the routine use of DNA sequence data to identify specimens and contribute toward the discovery of overlooked species of land plants.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Validation of the ITS2 Region as a Novel DNA Barcode for Identifying Medicinal Plant Species

              Background The plant working group of the Consortium for the Barcode of Life recommended the two-locus combination of rbcL + matK as the plant barcode, yet the combination was shown to successfully discriminate among 907 samples from 550 species at the species level with a probability of 72%. The group admits that the two-locus barcode is far from perfect due to the low identification rate, and the search is not over. Methodology/Principal Findings Here, we compared seven candidate DNA barcodes (psbA-trnH, matK, rbcL, rpoC1, ycf5, ITS2, and ITS) from medicinal plant species. Our ranking criteria included PCR amplification efficiency, differential intra- and inter-specific divergences, and the DNA barcoding gap. Our data suggest that the second internal transcribed spacer (ITS2) of nuclear ribosomal DNA represents the most suitable region for DNA barcoding applications. Furthermore, we tested the discrimination ability of ITS2 in more than 6600 plant samples belonging to 4800 species from 753 distinct genera and found that the rate of successful identification with the ITS2 was 92.7% at the species level. Conclusions The ITS2 region can be potentially used as a standard DNA barcode to identify medicinal plants and their closely related species. We also propose that ITS2 can serve as a novel universal barcode for the identification of a broader range of plant taxa.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Gigascience
                Gigascience
                gigascience
                GigaScience
                Oxford University Press
                2047-217X
                October 2017
                19 August 2017
                19 August 2017
                : 6
                : 10
                : 1-18
                Affiliations
                [1 ]RIKILT Wageningen University & Research, P.O. Box 230, 6700 AE Wageningen, The Netherlands
                [2 ]Food Quality and Design Group, Wageningen University and Research, P.O. Box 8129, 6700 EV Wageningen, The Netherlands
                [3 ]Baseclear B. V, Einsteinweg 5, 2333 CC Leiden, The Netherlands
                [4 ]GenoStar Bioinformatics Solutions, 60 rue Lavoisier, 38330 Montbonnot Saint Martin, France
                [5 ]iBET, Instituto de Biologia Experimental e Tecnológica, Apartado 12, 2780-901 Oeiras, Portugal
                [6 ]Norwegian Veterinary Institute, Ullevaalsveien 68, P.O. Box 750 Sentrum, 0106 Oslo, Norway
                [7 ]U.S. Customs and Border Protection Laboratory, 1100 Raymond Blvd Newark, NJ 07102 USA
                [8 ]LGC, Queens Road, Teddington, Middlesex, TW11 0LY, UK
                [9 ]Fera, Sand Hutton, York, YO41 1LZ, UK
                [10 ]Austrian Agency for Health and Food Safety, Spargelfeldstrasse 191, 1220 Vienna, Austria
                [11 ]Generalzolldirektion, Direktion IX, Bildungs- und Wissenschaftszentrum der Bundesfinanzverwaltung, Dienstort Hamburg, Baumacker 3, D-22523 Hamburg, Germany
                [12 ]Livsmedelsverket, Att. Lisa Lundberg, Strandbodgatan 4, SE 75323 Uppsala, Sweden
                [13 ]AGENZIA DELLE DOGANE E DEI MONOPOLI, Laboratori e servizi chimici – Laboratorio Chimico di Genova, 16126 Genova, Via Rubattino n. 6, Italy
                [14 ]Eurofins GeneScan GmbH, Engesserstrasse 4 79108 Freiburg, Germany
                [15 ]CREA-SCS sede di Tavazzano - Laboratorio via Emilia, Km 307, 26838 Tavazzano, Italy
                [16 ]Service Commun des Laboratoires, Laboratoire de Montpellier, Parc Euromédecine, 205 rue de la Croix Verte, 34196 Montpellier Cedex 5, France
                [17 ]Biolytix AG, Benkenstrasse 254, 4108 Witterswil, Switzerland
                [18 ]Crop Research Institute, Department of Molecular Genetics, Drnovská 507, 161 06 Prague, Czech Republic
                [19 ]Laboratory of Customs & Excises, Blijde Inkomststraat 20, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium
                [20 ]Dutch Customs Laboratory, Kingsfordweg 1, 1043 GN, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                Author notes
                [* ] Correspondence address: Esther Kok, RIKILT Wageningen University & Research, P.O. Box 230, 6700 AE Wageningen, The Netherlands; Tel: +31317481978/+31317480283; Fax: +31317417717; E-mail: esther.kok@ 123456wur.nl
                []Equal contribution
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1472-6710
                Article
                gix080
                10.1093/gigascience/gix080
                5632295
                29020743
                7fb9a799-e40f-4060-87ce-9167d6f1d777
                © The Authors 2017. Published by Oxford University Press.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 15 August 2017
                : 08 May 2017
                : 21 June 2017
                Page count
                Pages: 18
                Categories
                Research

                endangered species,cites,traditional medicines,dna metabarcoding,customs agencies,coi,matk,rbcl,cyt b,mini-barcodes

                Comments

                Comment on this article