5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Association of Prescription Drug Price Rebates in Medicare Part D With Patient Out-of-Pocket and Federal Spending

      , , ,
      JAMA Internal Medicine
      American Medical Association (AMA)

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          <p class="first" id="P1">The increasing cost of prescription drugs is a burden for patients and threatens the financial stability of the US health care system. Rebates are a form of price concession paid by a pharmaceutical manufacturer to the health plan sponsor or the pharmacy benefit manager working on the plan’s behalf. Proponents argue that rebates result from vigorous negotiations that help lower overall drug costs. Critics argue that rebates have perversely increased the costs patients pay out of pocket, as well as the costs for Medicare as a whole. This special communication discusses how the availability of rebates for drugs covered by the Medicare Part D program may raise costs for patients and Medicare while increasing the profits of Part D plan sponsors and pharmaceutical manufacturers. Two policy alternatives are herein proposed that would reconfigure cost sharing to lower patient out-of-pocket costs and reduce cost shifting to Medicare. </p>

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          JAMA Internal Medicine
          JAMA Intern Med
          American Medical Association (AMA)
          2168-6106
          August 01 2017
          August 01 2017
          : 177
          : 8
          : 1185
          Article
          10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.1885
          5722464
          28558108
          7fc8f15e-a6d3-45e4-b602-2caea1694a80
          © 2017
          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article