0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The accuracy of a recombinant antigen immunochromatographic test for the detection of Strongyloides stercoralis infection in migrants from sub-Saharan Africa

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Strongyloidiasis, a nematode infection which is mainly caused by Strongyloides stercoralis in humans, can lead to a fatal syndrome in immunocompromised individuals. Its diagnosis is challenging due to the absence of a diagnostic gold standard. The infection is highly prevalent in migrants from endemic countries in tropical and subtropical areas, and a rapid diagnostic test would be helpful for screening purposes. The aim of this study was to estimate the accuracy of a novel immunochromatographic test (ICT) for the diagnosis of S. stercoralis infection.

          Methods

          A single-centre diagnostic accuracy study was undertaken using well-characterized frozen sera available from the biobank of a referral hospital for parasitic diseases in Italy. The included sera were from migrants from sub-Saharan Africa, and matching results were available for agar plate culture and/or polymerase chain reaction for S. stercoralis; moreover, the results of both a commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay test and an in-house immunofluorescence test for strongyloidiasis were made available. Laboratory staff who read the ICT results were blinded as regards the results of the other tests. Two readers independently read the ICT, and a third one was involved when results were discrepant. The accuracy of the ICT was assessed both against the results of the panel of faecal tests and by latent class analysis (LCA).

          Results

          Agreement between the readers was excellent [Cohen’s κ = 92.7%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 88.3–97.1%]. When assessed against the results of the faecal tests, the sensitivity and specificity of the ICT were 82.4% (95% CI 75.7–89.0%) and 73.8% (95% CI 66.8–80.9%), respectively. According to the LCA, the sensitivity and specificity were 86.3% (95% CI 80.1–92.5%) and 73.9% (95% CI 67.0–80.8%), respectively.

          Conclusions

          The results of the ICT demonstrated ease of interpretation. The accuracy proved good, though the sensitivity might be further improved for screening purposes.

          Graphical Abstract

          Supplementary Information

          The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13071-022-05249-z.

          Related collections

          Most cited references24

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              STARD 2015 guidelines for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: explanation and elaboration

              Diagnostic accuracy studies are, like other clinical studies, at risk of bias due to shortcomings in design and conduct, and the results of a diagnostic accuracy study may not apply to other patient groups and settings. Readers of study reports need to be informed about study design and conduct, in sufficient detail to judge the trustworthiness and applicability of the study findings. The STARD statement (Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies) was developed to improve the completeness and transparency of reports of diagnostic accuracy studies. STARD contains a list of essential items that can be used as a checklist, by authors, reviewers and other readers, to ensure that a report of a diagnostic accuracy study contains the necessary information. STARD was recently updated. All updated STARD materials, including the checklist, are available at http://www.equator-network.org/reporting-guidelines/stard. Here, we present the STARD 2015 explanation and elaboration document. Through commented examples of appropriate reporting, we clarify the rationale for each of the 30 items on the STARD 2015 checklist, and describe what is expected from authors in developing sufficiently informative study reports.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                francesca.tamarozzi@sacrocuore.it
                silvia.longoni@sacrocuore.it
                cristina.mazzi@sacrocuore.it
                eleonora.rizzi@sacrocuore.it
                rahmah8485@gmail.com
                dora.buonfrate@sacrocuore.it
                Journal
                Parasit Vectors
                Parasit Vectors
                Parasites & Vectors
                BioMed Central (London )
                1756-3305
                23 April 2022
                23 April 2022
                2022
                : 15
                : 142
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.416422.7, ISNI 0000 0004 1760 2489, Department of Infectious Tropical Diseases and Microbiology, , IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, ; 37024 Negrar, Verona Italy
                [2 ]GRID grid.416422.7, ISNI 0000 0004 1760 2489, Clinical Research Unit, , IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, ; 37024 Negrar, Verona Italy
                [3 ]GRID grid.11875.3a, ISNI 0000 0001 2294 3534, Institute for Research in Molecular Medicine, , Universiti Sains Malaysia, ; 11800 Penang, Malaysia
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0108-6822
                Article
                5249
                10.1186/s13071-022-05249-z
                9034504
                35461265
                803c856a-2def-4ea5-8906-d467e435f19a
                © The Author(s) 2022

                Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

                History
                : 17 December 2021
                : 21 March 2022
                Categories
                Research
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2022

                Parasitology
                strongyloides,strongyloidiasis,rapid diagnostic test,immunochromatographic test,recombinant antigen,diagnostic study

                Comments

                Comment on this article