27
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Barriers and bridges to infection prevention and control: results of a qualitative case study of a Netherlands' surgical unit

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objectives

          The objectives of the study are to observe the overall work environment including infection prevention and control (IP&C) practices on the target surgical unit; to analyse the policies and procedures in the hospital and unit environments; to analyse the barriers and bridges to IP&C that practitioners identify in visual narratives of their unit environment and to collect monthly specific IP&C-related anonymised data.

          Design

          In this qualitative case study analysis, a socio-ecological approach on health systems informed the research design and provided a framework to better understand the complexity of implementing effective IP&C.

          Setting

          The study was conducted on a surgical unit at a Netherlands' hospital that reported successful reductions in the prevalence of targeted multidrug-resistant organisms.

          Methods

          Research methods included unit observations (n=3), review of relevant policies and procedures, five practitioner-led photo walkabouts of the unit (n=7), three photo elicitation focus groups with practitioners (n=13) and the review of related IP&C data.

          Results

          The findings indicate some conditions and processes present that may influence the low prevalence of multidrug-resistant organisms, including the ‘search and destroy’ active surveillance strategy, low occupancy rates, a centralised bed cleaning system and the presence of an active grass roots Hygiene in Practice group, which engages practitioners in several ongoing activities to promote IP&C on the units.

          Conclusions

          Further research on the benefits of practitioner-led community of practices on IP&C practices such as the Hygiene in Practice group is also recommended. Additional case studies to compare theses practices with other acute care hospital around the world would be a valuable way to better understand what IP&C programmes are most effective in which contexts and for what reasons. Further data are available by contacting the primary author directly.

          Article summary

          Article focus
          • To observe the overall work environment including infection prevention and control (IP&C) practices on the target surgical unit;

          • To critically review the policies and procedures aimed at the prevention and minimisation of multidrug-resistant organisms in the hospital and unit environments;

          • To analyse the barriers and bridges to IP&C that practitioners identify in visual narratives of their unit environment and

          • To collect monthly specific IP&C-related anonymised data.

          Key messages

          The findings indicate some conditions and processes present that may influence the low prevalence of multidrug-resistant organisms, including:

          • The ‘search and destroy’ active surveillance strategy, low occupancy rates

          • A centralised bed cleaning system and

          • The presence of an active grass roots Hygiene in Practice group, which engages practitioners in several ongoing activities to promote IP&C on the units.

          Strengths and limitations of this study
          • Multiple methods of data collection and a broad socio-ecological system approach to study IP&C on the unit strengthen this research.

          • It is possible that staff may have altered their behaviour from normal practices during unit observations.

          • The prevalence counts of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, vancomycin-resistant enterococc, Clostridium difficile infections and extended spectrum beta-lactamase; the rates of hand hygiene product usage and antibiotic data were collected by hospital personnel not supervised by the researcher, limiting the ability to assess the rigour of data collection.

          • The focus of this study was on a specific clinical unit of the hospital.

          Related collections

          Most cited references50

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The relationship between antimicrobial resistance and patient outcomes: mortality, length of hospital stay, and health care costs.

          There is an association between the development of antimicrobial resistance in Staphylococcus aureus, enterococci, and gram-negative bacilli and increases in mortality, morbidity, length of hospitalization, and cost of health care. For many patients, inadequate or delayed therapy and severe underlying disease are primarily responsible for the adverse outcomes of infections caused by antimicrobial-resistant organisms. Patients with infections due to antimicrobial-resistant organisms have higher costs (approximately 6,000-30,000 dollars) than do patients with infections due to antimicrobial-susceptible organisms; the difference in cost is even greater when patients infected with antimicrobial-resistant organisms are compared with patients without infection. Strategies to prevent nosocomial emergence and spread of antimicrobial-resistant organisms are essential.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Translating social ecological theory into guidelines for community health promotion.

            D Stokols (2015)
            Health promotion programs often lack a clearly specified theoretical foundation or are based on narrowly conceived conceptual models. For example, lifestyle modification programs typically emphasize individually focused behavior change strategies, while neglecting the environmental underpinnings of health and illness. This article compares three distinct, yet complementary, theoretical perspectives on health promotion: behavioral change, environmental enhancement, and social ecological models. Key strengths and limitations of each perspective are examined, and core principles of social ecological theory are used to derive practical guidelines for designing and evaluating community health promotion programs. Directions for future health promotion research are discussed, including studies examining the role of intermediaries (e.g., corporate decision-makers, legislators) in promoting the well-being of others, and those evaluating the duration and scope of intervention outcomes.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Effectiveness of a hospital-wide programme to improve compliance with hand hygiene. Infection Control Programme.

              Hand hygiene prevents cross infection in hospitals, but compliance with recommended instructions is commonly poor. We attempted to promote hand hygiene by implementing a hospital-wide programme, with special emphasis on bedside, alcohol-based hand disinfection. We measured nosocomial infections in parallel. We monitored the overall compliance with hand hygiene during routine patient care in a teaching hospital in Geneva, Switzerland, before and during implementation of a hand-hygiene campaign. Seven hospital-wide observational surveys were done twice yearly from December, 1994, to December, 1997. Secondary outcome measures were nosocomial infection rates, attack rates of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), and consumption of handrub disinfectant. We observed more than 20,000 opportunities for hand hygiene. Compliance improved progressively from 48% in 1994, to 66% in 1997 (p<0.001). Although recourse to handwashing with soap and water remained stable, frequency of hand disinfection substantially increased during the study period (p<0.001). This result was unchanged after adjustment for known risk factors of poor adherence. Hand hygiene improved significantly among nurses and nursing assistants, but remained poor among doctors. During the same period, overall nosocomial infection decreased (prevalence of 16.9% in 1994 to 9.9% in 1998; p=0.04), MRSA transmission rates decreased (2.16 to 0.93 episodes per 10,000 patient-days; p<0.001), and the consumption of alcohol-based handrub solution increased from 3.5 to 15.4 L per 1000 patient-days between 1993 and 1998 (p<0.001). The campaign produced a sustained improvement in compliance with hand hygiene, coinciding with a reduction of nosocomial infections and MRSA transmission. The promotion of bedside, antiseptic handrubs largely contributed to the increase in compliance.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                BMJ Open
                bmjopen
                bmjopen
                BMJ Open
                BMJ Group (BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR )
                2044-6055
                2012
                7 March 2012
                7 March 2012
                : 2
                : 2
                : e000511
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Faculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Alberta, Canada
                [2 ]Faculty of Health and Social Development, University of British Columbia, Okanagan
                [3 ]Department of Rural Economy, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
                [4 ]Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
                [5 ]Veterans Affairs Inpatient Evaluation Center, Ann Arbor Hospital, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
                [6 ]Department of Medical Microbiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
                Author notes
                Correspondence to Dr Chantal Backman; chantal.backman@ 123456ualberta.ca
                Article
                bmjopen-2011-000511
                10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000511
                3298832
                22397818
                814a814f-4ada-45e1-8465-083a2f788584
                © 2012, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode.

                History
                : 20 December 2011
                : 9 February 2012
                Categories
                Infectious Diseases
                Research
                1506
                1656
                1706

                Medicine
                Medicine

                Comments

                Comment on this article