13
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Prospective randomized study of direct anterior vs postero-lateral approach for total hip arthroplasty.

      The Journal of Arthroplasty
      Aged, Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip, methods, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Benefits of a direct anterior approach (DAA) versus a posterior-lateral (PA) approach to THA were assessed in a single-surgeon, IRB-approved, prospective, randomized clinical study. Subjects (43 DAA and 44 PA) were evaluated at 6 weeks, and 3, 6 and 12 months. The primary end point was ability to climb stairs normally and walk unlimited at each time point. Secondary end points included assessment by several outcome instruments. DAA subjects performed better during the immediate post-operative period; they had lower VAS pain scores on the first post-operative day, more subjects climbing stairs normally and walking unlimited at 6 weeks, and higher HOOS Symptoms scores at 3 months. There were no significant differences between groups at later time points. Findings confirm previous reports of benefits of DAA versus PA in early post-operative phases. Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          23523485
          10.1016/j.arth.2013.01.034

          Chemistry
          Aged,Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip,methods,Female,Humans,Male,Middle Aged,Prospective Studies
          Chemistry
          Aged, Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip, methods, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies

          Comments

          Comment on this article