12
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Factors affecting Iranian nurses’ intention to leave or stay in the profession during the COVID‐19 pandemic

      research-article
      , PhD Candidate 1 , , PhD 2 , , , PhD 3 , 4
      International Nursing Review
      John Wiley and Sons Inc.
      coronavirus, COVID‐19, intention to leave, Iran, nursing, pandemic, turnover

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Aim

          This study was conducted to explore the factors affecting nurses’ intentions to leave or stay in their profession during the coronavirus pandemic in Iran.

          Introduction

          Because the effectiveness of a healthcare response to a disaster depends on an available, skilled, and motivated healthcare workforce, it is essential to understand and address potential barriers to and reasons for the intentions of medical staff to leave or stay in their profession.

          Methods

          A qualitative study with a conventional content analysis approach was conducted. The participants included nurses working in hospitals during the COVID‐19 pandemic, and nurses who had previously left their job or had been absent from work for a period of time. The participants were selected using a purposeful sampling strategy. Data were collected through 19 in‐depth, individual semi‐structured interviews with 16 nurses. The COnsolidated criteria for REporting Qualitative research checklist was used to report the study.

          Findings

          Three categories; commitment and work conscience (with a subcategory of risk‐taking), fear (with two subcategories of fear of family infection and fear of protective equipment shortages), and organizational factors (with two subcategories of organizational atmosphere of the hospital and motivational factors), emerged from the analysis.

          Conclusion

          The reasons for quitting a nursing job or to keep working as a nurse during the pandemic include both personal and organizational factors. Commitment and work conscience in pandemic conditions is one of the main factors for keeping nurses in their profession.

          Implication for nursing practice and policy

          Gaining insight into nurses’ understanding of the situation and perspectives is the key to being able to provide appropriate support and keep them in the workforce. Peer support can play an important role in supporting novice nurses in facing challenges posed by a pandemic and should be improved. Also, programs and strategies need to be planned to improve resilience among nurses and to help them to manage their stress and fear.

          Related collections

          Most cited references45

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Naturalistic inquiry

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Risk of COVID-19 among front-line health-care workers and the general community: a prospective cohort study

            Summary Background Data for front-line health-care workers and risk of COVID-19 are limited. We sought to assess risk of COVID-19 among front-line health-care workers compared with the general community and the effect of personal protective equipment (PPE) on risk. Methods We did a prospective, observational cohort study in the UK and the USA of the general community, including front-line health-care workers, using self-reported data from the COVID Symptom Study smartphone application (app) from March 24 (UK) and March 29 (USA) to April 23, 2020. Participants were voluntary users of the app and at first use provided information on demographic factors (including age, sex, race or ethnic background, height and weight, and occupation) and medical history, and subsequently reported any COVID-19 symptoms. We used Cox proportional hazards modelling to estimate multivariate-adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) of our primary outcome, which was a positive COVID-19 test. The COVID Symptom Study app is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04331509. Findings Among 2 035 395 community individuals and 99 795 front-line health-care workers, we recorded 5545 incident reports of a positive COVID-19 test over 34 435 272 person-days. Compared with the general community, front-line health-care workers were at increased risk for reporting a positive COVID-19 test (adjusted HR 11·61, 95% CI 10·93–12·33). To account for differences in testing frequency between front-line health-care workers and the general community and possible selection bias, an inverse probability-weighted model was used to adjust for the likelihood of receiving a COVID-19 test (adjusted HR 3·40, 95% CI 3·37–3·43). Secondary and post-hoc analyses suggested adequacy of PPE, clinical setting, and ethnic background were also important factors. Interpretation In the UK and the USA, risk of reporting a positive test for COVID-19 was increased among front-line health-care workers. Health-care systems should ensure adequate availability of PPE and develop additional strategies to protect health-care workers from COVID-19, particularly those from Black, Asian, and minority ethnic backgrounds. Additional follow-up of these observational findings is needed. Funding Zoe Global, Wellcome Trust, Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council, National Institutes of Health Research, UK Research and Innovation, Alzheimer's Society, National Institutes of Health, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, and Massachusetts Consortium on Pathogen Readiness.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The mental health of medical workers in Wuhan, China dealing with the 2019 novel coronavirus

              In December, 2019, a novel coronavirus outbreak of pneumonia emerged in Wuhan, Hubei province, China, 1 and has subsequently garnered attention around the world. 2 In the fight against the 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV), medical workers in Wuhan have been facing enormous pressure, including a high risk of infection and inadequate protection from contamination, overwork, frustration, discrimination, isolation, patients with negative emotions, a lack of contact with their families, and exhaustion. The severe situation is causing mental health problems such as stress, anxiety, depressive symptoms, insomnia, denial, anger, and fear. These mental health problems not only affect the medical workers' attention, understanding, and decision making ability, which might hinder the fight against 2019-nCoV, but could also have a lasting effect on their overall wellbeing. Protecting the mental health of these medical workers is thus important for control of the epidemic and their own long-term health. The local government of Wuhan has implemented policies to address these mental health problems. Medical staff infected with 2019-nCoV while at work will be identified as having work-related injuries. 3 As of Jan 25, 2020, 1230 medical workers have been sent from other provinces to Wuhan to care for patients who are infected and those with suspected infection, strengthen logistics support, and help reduce the pressure on health-care personnel. 4 Most general hospitals in Wuhan have established a shift system to allow front-line medical workers to rest and to take turns in high-pressured roles. Online platforms with medical advice have been provided to share information on how to decrease the risk of transmission between the patients in medical settings, which aims to eventually reduce the pressure on medical workers. Psychological intervention teams have been set up by the RenMin Hospital of Wuhan University and Mental Health Center of Wuhan, which comprise four groups of health-care staff. Firstly, the psychosocial response team (composed of managers and press officers in the hospitals) coordinates the management team's work and publicity tasks. Secondly, the psychological intervention technical support team (composed of senior psychological intervention experts) is responsible for formulating psychological intervention materials and rules, and providing technical guidance and supervision. Thirdly, the psychological intervention medical team, who are mainly psychiatrists, participates in clinical psychological intervention for health-care workers and patients. Lastly, the psychological assistance hotline teams (composed of volunteers who have received psychological assistance training in dealing with the 2019-nCoV epidemic) provide telephone guidance to help deal with mental health problems. Hundreds of medical workers are receiving these interventions, with good response, and their provision is expanding to more people and hospitals. Understanding the mental health response after a public health emergency might help medical workers and communities prepare for a population's response to a disaster. 5 On Jan 27, 2020, the National Health Commission of China published a national guideline of psychological crisis intervention for 2019-nCoV. 4 This publication marks the first time that guidance to provide multifaceted psychological protection of the mental health of medical workers has been initiated in China. The experiences from this public health emergency should inform the efficiency and quality of future crisis intervention of the Chinese Government and authorities around the world.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                esmaeiliem@yahoo.com , esmaeili_m@tums.ac.ir
                Journal
                Int Nurs Rev
                Int Nurs Rev
                10.1111/(ISSN)1466-7657
                INR
                International Nursing Review
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                0020-8132
                1466-7657
                25 September 2021
                25 September 2021
                : 10.1111/inr.12718
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] School of Nursing and Midwifery Tehran University of Medical Sciences Tehran Iran
                [ 2 ] Nursing and Midwifery Care Research Center School of Nursing and Midwifery Tehran University of Medical Sciences Tehran Iran
                [ 3 ] Department of Health Sciences The Swedish Red Cross University College Stockholm Sweden
                [ 4 ] Department of Neurobiology Care Sciences and Society Karolinska Institutet Solna Sweden
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Maryam Esmaeili, Nursing and Midwifery Care Research Center, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, East Nosrat Street, Tohid Square, Tehran 1419732171, Iran.

                Email: esmaeiliem@ 123456yahoo.com ; esmaeili_m@ 123456tums.ac.ir

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2088-0178
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4798-2270
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3589-318X
                Article
                INR12718
                10.1111/inr.12718
                8653279
                34561862
                82abf355-26d1-4f9f-82bc-cb4725c64bd8
                © 2021 International Council of Nurses

                This article is being made freely available through PubMed Central as part of the COVID-19 public health emergency response. It can be used for unrestricted research re-use and analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source, for the duration of the public health emergency.

                History
                : 15 August 2021
                : 26 December 2020
                : 23 August 2021
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 3, Pages: 11, Words: 7939
                Funding
                Funded by: Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
                Categories
                Original Article
                Original Articles
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                corrected-proof
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.0.9 mode:remove_FC converted:08.12.2021

                Nursing
                coronavirus,covid‐19,intention to leave,iran,nursing,pandemic,turnover
                Nursing
                coronavirus, covid‐19, intention to leave, iran, nursing, pandemic, turnover

                Comments

                Comment on this article