1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Lateral Branch of the Thoracodorsal Nerve (LaT Branch) Transfer for Biceps Reinnervation

      case-report

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

          Summary:

          In cases of significant upper extremity trauma, the thoracodorsal nerve is a reliable secondary option for the restoration of elbow flexion. In all previous descriptions, however, the entire nerve is transferred. We describe a case utilizing the lateral thoracodorsal nerve (LaT) branch for biceps reinnervation with an associated cadaver study. Transfer of the LaT branch to the biceps branch was performed on a patient who had sustained a traumatic brachial plexus injury that left him without elbow flexion. Also, 4 cadavers (8 upper extremities) were dissected to identify the bifurcation of the thoracodorsal nerve and confirm the feasibility of transferring the LaT branch to the biceps motor branch. Axon counts of the thoracodorsal proper, LaT branch, musculocutaneous proper, and the biceps branch were also obtained. A bifurcation of the thoracodorsal nerve was present in all cadaver specimens, with an average distance of 7.5 cm (range, 6.2–9.8 cm) from the insertion of the latissimus dorsi muscle. Axon counts revealed a donor-to-recipient ratio of 0.85:1. Follow-up of our patient at 1 year showed improvement of elbow flexion manual muscle testing grade from 0 to 4/5. Furthermore, electromyography at 1 year confirmed biceps reinnervation and showed normal readings of the latissimus compared with preoperative electromyography. Transfer of the LaT branch is a viable and minimally morbid option for biceps reinnervation after traumatic branchial plexus injury. Further follow-up of our patient and larger prospective studies are needed to understand the true potential of this nerve transfer.

          Related collections

          Most cited references10

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Nerve transfer to biceps muscle using a part of ulnar nerve for C5-C6 avulsion of the brachial plexus: anatomical study and report of four cases.

          Four patients with C5-C6 root avulsion after brachial plexus injury were treated with a transfer of part of a normal functioning nerve in the arm to the motor nerve of the biceps. Ten percent of the bulk of the ulnar nerve was harvested for a suture directly to the motor nerve of the biceps with no significant impairment of hand function.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Nerve transfers: indications, techniques, and outcomes.

            This article provides an update of the current strategies of motor and sensory nerve transfers for peripheral nerve lesions of the upper extremity. Indications, techniques, and outcomes are summarized for both well-established transfers used in the management of proximal and brachial plexus injuries as well as those more recently developed for more distal and isolated nerve injuries in the forearm and hand. Copyright 2010. Published by Elsevier Inc.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Results of nerve transfer techniques for restoration of shoulder and elbow function in the context of a meta-analysis of the English literature.

              We report the results of 15 patients who underwent nerve transfer for restoration of shoulder and elbow function at our institution for traumatic brachial plexus palsy. We present these results in the context of a meta-analysis of the English literature, designed to quantitatively assess the efficacy of individual nerve transfers for restoration of elbow and shoulder function in a large number of patients. One thousand eighty-eight nerve transfers from 27 studies met the inclusion criteria of the analysis. Seventy-two percent of direct intercostal to musculocutaneous transfers (without interposition nerve grafts) achieved biceps strength > or =M3 versus 47% using interposition grafts. Direct intercostal transfers to the musculocutaneous nerve had a better ability to achieve > or =M4 elbow strength than transfers from the spinal accessory nerve (41% vs 29%). The suprascapular nerve fared significantly better than the axillary nerve in obtaining > or =M3 shoulder abduction (92% vs 69%). At our institution 90% of intercostal to musculocutaneous transfers (n = 10) achieved > or =M3 bicep strength and 70% achieved > or =M4 strength. Four of seven patients achieved > or =M3 shoulder abduction with a single nerve transfer and 6 of 7 regained > or =M3 strength with a dual nerve transfer. This study suggests that interposition nerve grafts should be avoided when possible when performing nerve transfers. Better results for restoration of elbow flexion have been attained with intercostal to musculocutaneous transfers than with spinal accessory nerve transfers and spinal accessory to suprascapular transfers appear to have the best outcomes for return of shoulder abduction. We conclude that nerve transfer is an effective means to restore elbow and shoulder function in brachial plexus paralysis.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open
                Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open
                GOX
                Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open
                Wolters Kluwer Health
                2169-7574
                19 March 2018
                March 2018
                : 6
                : 3
                : e1698
                Affiliations
                From the Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pa.
                Author notes
                Alexander M. Spiess, MD, Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 3550 Terrace Street, Scaife Hall, Suite 6B, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, E-mail: spiessam@ 123456upmc.edu
                Article
                00025
                10.1097/GOX.0000000000001698
                5908494
                82d51dff-79ad-4d37-9392-f17034c29bbc
                Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.

                History
                : 22 November 2017
                : 12 January 2018
                Categories
                Case Report
                Custom metadata
                TRUE
                T

                Comments

                Comment on this article