12
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The characteristics and prognostic value of signet ring cell histology in gastric cancer: A retrospective cohort study of 2199 consecutive patients

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text

          Abstract

          Although signet ring cell cancer (SRCC) has long been regarded as an adverse prognostic factor of gastric cancer, the findings of existing studies on this issue are inconsistent. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 2199 consecutive patients with gastric cancer treated in a tertiary cancer hospital in Beijing, China, 1994 to 2013. The characteristics of SRCC and non-SRCC were compared. The prognostic effects of SRCC and other important clinicopathological factors on overall survival were evaluated by both univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses and expressed as hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). SRCC accounted for 16.1% of gastric cancer, increasing from 6% to 20% over the last 2 decades, and was associated with younger age, female sex, poor differentiation, diffuse type, and distal location. SRCC (HR: 1.387, 95% CI: 1.177–1.634), stage (HR: 1.752, 95% CI: 1.458–2.106), surgery (palliative resection: HR: 0.712, 95% CI: 0.590–0.859; curative resection: HR: 0.490, 95% CI: 0.380–0.633), performance status (HR: 1.849, 95% CI: 1.553–2.201), and age (HR: 1.070, 95% CI: 1.001–1.143) were independent prognostic factors for gastric cancer, whereas time period of diagnosis, sex, and tumor location were not statistically significantly associated with overall survival. Subgroup analyses showed that the prognostic value of SRCC did not vary much with age, sex, performance status, stage, and surgery and chemotherapy status. As compared with non-SRCC, SRCC accounted for increasingly more of gastric cancer and was associated with younger age, female sex, poor differentiation, diffuse type, and distal location. It was an independent prognostic factor associated with worse survival in gastric cancer.

          Related collections

          Most cited references30

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis based on aggregate data.

          This systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to assess the efficacy and tolerability of chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer. Randomized phase II and III clinical trials on first-line chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer were identified by electronic searches of Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, and Cancerlit; hand searches of relevant abstract books and reference lists; and contact to experts. Meta-analysis was performed using the fixed-effect model. Overall survival, reported as hazard ratio (HR) with 95% CI, was the primary outcome measure. Analysis of chemotherapy versus best supportive care (HR = 0.39; 95% CI, 0.28 to 0.52) and combination versus single agent, mainly fluorouracil (FU) -based chemotherapy (HR = 0.83; 95% CI = 0.74 to 0.93) showed significant overall survival benefits in favor of chemotherapy and combination chemotherapy, respectively. In addition, comparisons of FU/cisplatin-containing regimens with versus without anthracyclines (HR = 0.77; 95% CI, 0.62 to 0.95) and FU/anthracycline-containing combinations with versus without cisplatin (HR = 0.83; 95% CI, 0.76 to 0.91) both demonstrated a significant survival benefit for the three-drug combination. Comparing irinotecan-containing versus nonirinotecan-containing combinations (mainly FU/cisplatin) resulted in a nonsignificant survival benefit in favor of the irinotecan-containing regimens (HR = 0.88; 95% CI, 0.73 to 1.06), but they have never been compared against a three-drug combination. Best survival results are achieved with three-drug regimens containing FU, an anthracycline, and cisplatin. Among these, regimens including FU as bolus exhibit a higher rate of toxic deaths than regimens using a continuous infusion of FU, such as epirubicin, cisplatin, and continuous-infusion FU.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            [WHO Classification of digestive tumors: the fourth edition].

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Comparison of ECOG/WHO performance status and ASA score as a measure of functional status.

              The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group/World Health Organization Performance Status (ECOG/WHO PS) is a prognostic factor. It should be used in analyzing health outcomes such as risk-adjusted hospital performance models in cancer populations. Performance status is rarely recorded in surgery, often the place where cancer is first diagnosed. Could a universally collected preoperative measure be substituted for ECOG/WHO PS?
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Medicine (Baltimore)
                Medicine (Baltimore)
                MEDI
                Medicine
                Wolters Kluwer Health
                0025-7974
                1536-5964
                July 2016
                08 July 2016
                : 95
                : 27
                : e4052
                Affiliations
                [a ]Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of GI Medical Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China
                [b ]Division of Epidemiology, JC School of Public Health and Primary Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong.
                Author notes
                []Correspondence: Lin Shen, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of GI Medical Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China (e-mail: linshenpku@ 123456163.com ).
                Article
                04052
                10.1097/MD.0000000000004052
                5058817
                27399088
                82ec9d80-40cb-416e-bc02-3be4e957988d
                Copyright © 2016 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

                This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0, where it is permissible to download, share and reproduce the work in any medium, provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0

                History
                : 1 December 2015
                : 13 May 2016
                : 2 June 2016
                Categories
                4500
                Research Article
                Observational Study
                Custom metadata
                TRUE
                T

                cohort study,gastric cancer,prognosis,review,signet ring cell,survival

                Comments

                Comment on this article