29
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      The role of femoral offset and abductor lever arm in total hip arthroplasty

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          In order to create a well-functioning total hip arthroplasty (THA), it is important to restore femoral off-set and thus the abductor lever arm. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical effect of increasing the abductor lever arm to and beyond the anatomical native lever arm in minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty performed through a direct anterior approach.

          Materials and methods

          We compared the lever arm of the operated hip to the lever arm of the contralateral native hip on radiographs in 148 patients following THA. The patients were divided in two groups based on whether they kept their anatomical lever arm or had an increased lever arm. The clinical outcome was assessed using hip osteoarthritis outcome score (HOOS), Harris hip score and UCLA activity score.

          Results

          Patients who kept their anatomical lever arm did not experience a significantly better clinical outcome than the patients with an increased abductor lever arm. We found no significant difference in clinical scores at any of the follow-ups during the first year after THA.

          Conclusion

          The results of this study suggest that an increase in the abductor lever arm does not have major effects on the clinical outcome after THA. To avoid the potential negative effects of decreasing the lever arm, the surgeon should aim for an equal or slightly increased lever arm.

          Level of evidence Level 3, prospective cohort study.

          Related collections

          Most cited references16

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Effect of femoral offset on range of motion and abductor muscle strength after total hip arthroplasty.

          At a minimum of one year after operation, we studied 64 patients with 86 total hip arthroplasties (THA) by standard anteroposterior hip and pelvic radiographs and measurement of range of motion and of isometric abduction strength. The femoral offset correlated positively with the range of abduction (p = 0.046). Abduction strength correlated positively with both femoral offset (p = 0.0001) and the length of the abductor lever arm (p = 0.005). Using multiple regression, abduction strength correlated with height (p = 0.017), gender (p = 0.0005), range of flexion (p = 0.047) and the abductor lever arm (p = 0.060). Our findings suggest that greater femoral offset after THA allows both an increased range of abduction and greater abductor strength.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Reconstructed hip joint position and abductor muscle strength after total hip arthroplasty.

            We evaluated 60 limbs in 30 patients with unilateral primary total hip arthroplasty and nondiseased contralateral hip. The ratio of femoral offset (FO) to the body weight lever arm (FO ratio) and the ratio of the height of hip center (HC) to pelvic height (HC ratio) were calculated on radiographs. Isometric hip abductor strength was measured by dynamometer. The ratio of normalized strength of the reconstructed side to that of the nonoperated side was calculated (strength ratio). The FO ratio correlated positively to the strength ratio (r = 0.491; P = .0059), whereas the HC ratio correlated negatively (r = -0.568; P = .0011). Slight increase of FO ratio along with restoration of normal hip joint center erring on the side of slight inferomedial cup positioning appeared to optimize hip abductor function.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Acetabular polyethylene wear and acetabular inclination and femoral offset.

              Restoration of femoral offset and acetabular inclination may have an effect on polyethylene (PE) wear in THA. We therefore assessed the effect of femoral offset and acetabular inclination (angle) on acetabular conventional (not highly cross-linked) PE wear in uncemented THA. We prospectively followed 43 uncemented THAs for a minimum of 49 months (mean, 64 months; range, 49-88 months). Radiographs were assessed for femoral offset, acetabular inclination, and conventional PE wear. The mean (+/- standard deviation) linear wear rate in all THAs was 0.14 mm/year (+/- 0.01 mm/year) and the mean volumetric wear rate was 53.1 mm(3)/year (+/- 5.5 mm(3)/year). In THAs with an acetabular angle less than 45 degrees , the mean wear was 0.12 mm/year (+/- 0.01 mm/year) compared with 0.18 mm/year (+/- 0.02 mm/year) in those with a reconstructed acetabular angle greater than 45 degrees . Reproduction of a reconstructed femoral offset to within 5 mm of the native femoral offset was associated with a reduction in conventional PE wear (0.12 mm/year versus 0.16 mm/year). Careful placement of the acetabular component to ensure an acetabular angle less than 45 degrees in the reconstructed hip allows for reduced conventional PE wear. Level II, prospective study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                +47-40077287 , filipbjordal@hotmail.com
                krisbjorgul@gmail.com
                Journal
                J Orthop Traumatol
                J Orthop Traumatol
                Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology : Official Journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology
                Springer International Publishing (Cham )
                1590-9921
                1590-9999
                12 June 2015
                12 June 2015
                December 2015
                : 16
                : 4
                : 325-330
                Affiliations
                [ ]University of Oslo, Hollandveien 26, 1555 Son, Norway
                [ ]Østfold Hospital Trust, Aleris Health Oslo, Chr. Svendsens gate 6, 1771 Halden, Norway
                Article
                358
                10.1007/s10195-015-0358-7
                4633429
                26068583
                83cfc439-0206-4fca-9429-8b14026c3c22
                © The Author(s) 2015

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

                History
                : 13 November 2014
                : 22 May 2015
                Categories
                Original Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2015

                Orthopedics
                hip arthroplasty,minimally invasive hip arthroplasty,femoral off-set,uncemented,hoos,harris hip score

                Comments

                Comment on this article