8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Physicians' perspectives on communication and decision making in clinical encounters for treatment of latent tuberculosis infection

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The aim of the study was to explore the views of tuberculosis (TB) physicians on treatment of latent TB infection (LTBI), focusing on decision making and communication in clinical practice.

          20 Australian TB physicians participated in a semistructured interview in person or over the telephone. Interviews were recorded, transcribed and analysed thematically.

          The study identified challenges that physicians face when discussing treatment for LTBI with patients. These included difficulties explaining the concept of latency (in particular to patients from culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds) and providing guidance to patients while still framing treatment decisions as a choice. Tailored estimates of the risk of developing TB and the risk of developing an adverse effect from LTBI treatment were considered the most important information for decision making and discussion with patients. Physicians acknowledged that there is a significant amount of unwarranted treatment variation, which they attributed to the lack of evidence about the risk–benefit balance of LTBI treatment in certain scenarios and guidelines that refer to the need for case-by-case decision making in many instances.

          In order to successfully implement LTBI treatment at a clinical level, consideration should be given to research on how to best address communication challenges arising in clinical encounters.

          Abstract

          Overcoming challenges in clinical encounters is essential for implementation of treatment of latent TB infection http://ow.ly/HEFu30izBUu

          Related collections

          Most cited references23

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Targeted tuberculin testing and treatment of latent tuberculosis infection. This official statement of the American Thoracic Society was adopted by the ATS Board of Directors, July 1999. This is a Joint Statement of the American Thoracic Society (ATS) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). This statement was endorsed by the Council of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. (IDSA), September 1999, and the sections of this statement.

          (2000)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The cascade of care in diagnosis and treatment of latent tuberculosis infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

            WHO estimates that a third of the world's population has latent tuberculosis infection and that less than 5% of those infected are diagnosed and treated to prevent tuberculosis. We aimed to systematically review studies that report the steps from initial tuberculosis screening through to treatment for latent tuberculosis infection, which we call the latent tuberculosis cascade of care. We specifically aimed to assess the number of people lost at each stage of the cascade.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Presenting quantitative information about decision outcomes: a risk communication primer for patient decision aid developers

              Background Making evidence-based decisions often requires comparison of two or more options. Research-based evidence may exist which quantifies how likely the outcomes are for each option. Understanding these numeric estimates improves patients’ risk perception and leads to better informed decision making. This paper summarises current “best practices” in communication of evidence-based numeric outcomes for developers of patient decision aids (PtDAs) and other health communication tools. Method An expert consensus group of fourteen researchers from North America, Europe, and Australasia identified eleven main issues in risk communication. Two experts for each issue wrote a “state of the art” summary of best evidence, drawing on the PtDA, health, psychological, and broader scientific literature. In addition, commonly used terms were defined and a set of guiding principles and key messages derived from the results. Results The eleven key components of risk communication were: 1) Presenting the chance an event will occur; 2) Presenting changes in numeric outcomes; 3) Outcome estimates for test and screening decisions; 4) Numeric estimates in context and with evaluative labels; 5) Conveying uncertainty; 6) Visual formats; 7) Tailoring estimates; 8) Formats for understanding outcomes over time; 9) Narrative methods for conveying the chance of an event; 10) Important skills for understanding numerical estimates; and 11) Interactive web-based formats. Guiding principles from the evidence summaries advise that risk communication formats should reflect the task required of the user, should always define a relevant reference class (i.e., denominator) over time, should aim to use a consistent format throughout documents, should avoid “1 in x” formats and variable denominators, consider the magnitude of numbers used and the possibility of format bias, and should take into account the numeracy and graph literacy of the audience. Conclusion A substantial and rapidly expanding evidence base exists for risk communication. Developers of tools to facilitate evidence-based decision making should apply these principles to improve the quality of risk communication in practice.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                ERJ Open Res
                ERJ Open Res
                ERJOR
                erjor
                ERJ Open Research
                European Respiratory Society
                2312-0541
                January 2018
                23 March 2018
                : 4
                : 1
                : 00146-2017
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Liverpool Hospital, South Western Sydney Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
                [2 ]Ingham Institute of Applied Medical Research, Sydney, Australia
                [3 ]Woolcock Institute of Medical Research, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
                [4 ]Centre of Research Excellence in Tuberculosis, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
                [5 ]Mayo Clinic Center for Tuberculosis and Evidence-Based Practice Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
                [6 ]Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, Australia
                Author notes
                Claudia C. Dobler, Dept of Respiratory Medicine, Liverpool Hospital, Elizabeth Street, Liverpool, NSW 2034, Australia. E-mail: c.dobler@ 123456unsw.edu.au
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5460-0189
                Article
                00146-2017
                10.1183/23120541.00146-2017
                5864969
                841e8990-5d0d-4701-9127-a99c95df65b4
                The content of this work is ©the authors or their employers. Design and branding are ©ERS 2018

                This article is open access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Licence 4.0.

                History
                : 14 November 2017
                : 08 February 2018
                Funding
                Funded by: Ingham Institute of Applied Medical Research, Sydney, Australia http://doi.org/
                Award ID: project support
                Funded by: Centre of Research Excellence in Tuberculosis Control, University of Sydney http://doi.org/
                Award ID: project support
                Funded by: National Health and Medical Research Council http://doi.org/10.13039/501100000925
                Award ID: APP1090198 (fellowship for Claudia C. Dobler)
                Categories
                Original Articles
                4

                Comments

                Comment on this article